Talk:Ammonia production: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
m Added unsigned tag and title to first comment. |
m Response to a comment |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
==Suggestion== |
==Suggestion== |
||
This page is basically a repeat of what is stated in the main ammonia article, so I would suggest deleting this article and transfer any relevant information to the main ammonia page. <small>{{unsigned|220.244.243.46|23 May 2005 (UTC)}}</small> |
This page is basically a repeat of what is stated in the main ammonia article, so I would suggest deleting this article and transfer any relevant information to the main ammonia page. <small>{{unsigned|220.244.243.46|23 May 2005 (UTC)}}</small> |
||
:The transfer of information has already been done. After this article was written, it was transferred to the main ammonia article. However, it was felt that there was a need to retain this article because some readers may only seek the industrial synthesis and production of ammonia. Regards, - [[User:Mbeychok|mbeychok]] 15:29, 23 May 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:29, 23 May 2007
PLEASE use the above + tab to enter a new comment. That provides you a form in which to first enter a Subject and then enter the new comment. Please sign the comment with four tildes like this ~~~~. That automatically signs it with your user name, the date and the time. The form automatically provides subject Headings like those below and enters them in the Table of Contents which will appear below after four comments are posted.
The first responder to someone's new comment should enter the response just beneath the new comment (instead of using the above + tab) and indent the response by starting with a colon like this :. Any second responder, indent further by starting with two colons like this :: and any third responder, start with three colons like this ::: and so forth. If we don't follow these practices, the result is jumbled mess.
The first responder to someone's new comment should enter the response just beneath the new comment (instead of using the above + tab) and indent the response by starting with a colon like this :. Any second responder, indent further by starting with two colons like this :: and any third responder, start with three colons like this ::: and so forth. If we don't follow these practices, the result is jumbled mess.
Suggestion
This page is basically a repeat of what is stated in the main ammonia article, so I would suggest deleting this article and transfer any relevant information to the main ammonia page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.244.243.46 (talk • contribs) 23 May 2005 (UTC)
- The transfer of information has already been done. After this article was written, it was transferred to the main ammonia article. However, it was felt that there was a need to retain this article because some readers may only seek the industrial synthesis and production of ammonia. Regards, - mbeychok 15:29, 23 May 2007 (UTC)