User talk:Xcentaur/Archive 7

“ There is no reasonable defense against an idiot with an agenda - Anon ”

Images

hmmm... m planning to work on the images section now.. cleanup and all, its got a BIG backlog, and even if i was superfast, i cant clear the entire thing because of copyright issues and stuff... anyways, how was CET? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cyberoidx (talk • contribs)

Physics ruined me... chem was good, maths got a bit screwy... howd yours go? xC | ☎ 05:26, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

lol, ditto I just wish i'm in IIT now... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cyberoidx (talk • contribs)

LOL, sure you're gettin in? I'm clearing maths for sure, chem probably too... but physics is the bane of my existence... physics has been khafaa with me for way too long .... :P xC | ☎ 05:07, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Remember that user who's page i had ripped ? She's come back again and changed my pages, calling adding credits to herself a minor fix. I had already given her credits on the template using the noinclude tag, but she prefers to tell everyone that i have ripped the page, when i asked her to stop doing it, she added a section to her userpage called People who have copied my theme and added my name to it. Dont know if that is considered as an attack. I managed to save entire convo (which is humourous at times, see Real96 Archives and comment here, i'll check back :) CyberoidX 14:04, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Look, you're wasting time. You are here to improve an encyclopedia. This is not a social networking site. Your reputation as an editor will not be established by having a snazzy userpage and zilch to show for productive edits.

Clearly this isnt an editor who lets little scratches go. If its so much of an issue, just empty out your page, put an under construction sign and redesign. Be original, be creative, be individualistic. Let this nonsense over two bits of Wiki Code go.

Spend your time on editing mainspace, not userspace, bro. Its not worth the trouble. Cheers! xC | ☎ 16:55, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

its all fixed now, it was just the fact that someone comes to my page and credits herself happily, and repeatedly which made me hyper, anyways, we managed to come to a solution, or so i think :) CyberoidX 05:50, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Good for you. Tell me, which pages are you working on now? Or are you working on the image backlog? xC | ☎ 09:57, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Welcoming Newbies, vandal warnings, Checking Newbie edits, Speedy'ing useless New pages, and converting bar graphs to svg. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cyberoidx (talk • contribs)

hi

editor was referring to a faulty tag on his talk page, which I removed and dropped a note explaining that

hi, i got a message from you. thanks for doing the needful. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ab 18 (talk • contribs)

Anytime. Happy editing! xC | ☎ 14:59, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Thank you

I wanted to say thanks for the kind words about the essay on my user page. It's good to know that someone else feels the way I do about this place -- enormous, sprawling, and often dysfunctional, and yet overall, it's working. Keep fighting the good fight! — Catherine\^talk 19:30, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Hey

Isn't pay important? I have a reference for Rani's salary for one movie but shshsh wouldn't let me put it in. I just have it put like in Julia Roberts page. There's no comparison or approximation. There's nothing written about highest-paid or compared to any other actress. It's just a number. There's nothing wrong with that, right? But shshsh just thinks it's wrong for no apparent reason, please talk to him. It just says she was paid this amount of money for one particular movie. There's nothing wrong with that. Thanks. -shez_15

There is a problem, actually. Firstly, these apparent facts aren't confirmed by the actress' manager or the actress herself, and are mainly hearsay or well-educated guesses. Neither is appropriate for an encyclopedia article. Secondly, there is no requirement to list how much she got for doing a particular movie. Thirdly, the Julia Roberts article has rubbish about friendships in the lead para, and is wholly unsourced. The article isn't at all a template for anything we should work towards. Only FA level articles should be considered guidance on what to have and what not to have in a respectable filmbio.

Regards,xC | ☎ 07:10, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Removal of tags

REGARDING INTENTIONAL REMOVAL OF TAG, IT HAS NOT DONE INTENTIONALLY. SORRY FOR THAT. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mb2 pk (talk • contribs)

Ok, happy editing!xC | ☎ 08:33, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

REGARDING THIS TOPIC, I WOULD LIKE TO TELL YOU THAT THESES FAMILIES ARE VERY FAMOUS IN THAT AREA AND ALL THESE FAMILIES ARE GAINTS OF THE AREA. FOR YOUR GUIDANCE, YOU CAN VISIT THE FOLLOWING LINK. http://www.world66.com/asia/southasia/pakistan/sadiqabad — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mb2 pk (talk • contribs)

Please put in those references wherever it is appropriate. Unsourced and unencyclopedic text must be removed. xC | ☎ 08:37, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

You have edited that page. In fact, theres a line at the bottom stating Contributors May 26,2007 change by mb2_pk. Since you have entered this yourself, this is not a reliable source.

Also, a quick look at the members area reveals This. You have merely inserted the content you wanted to. That does not make the website a reliable source.

ThanksxC | ☎ 08:41, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Hilal-e-Istaqlal

HILAL-E-ISTAQLAL WAS THE NOME OF AWARD WHICH WAS GIVEN TO THE CITIZENS OF LAHORE, SIALKOT AND SARGODHA ON THEIR BRAVERY BEHAVIOUR DURING THE 1965 PAKISTAN INDIA WAR. ITS A FLAG WHICH WAS GIVEN TO THEM. MOREOVER, THE IMAGE WHICH WAS LOADED BELONGS TO A POSTAGE STAMP ISSUED BY THE PAKISTAN POST OFFICE IN 1966.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Mb2 pk (talk • contribs)

Perhaps. What would you like me to do about it? xC | ☎ 08:42, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

I WANT THAT THIS TOPIC MUST BE INCLUDED IN YOUR ENCYCLOPEDIA AND IF OTHER PEOPLE DOES NOT ANY OBJECTION, IT MUST BE REMAIN IN YOUR GREAT WEBSITE TOPICS — Preceding unsigned comment added by mb2_pk (talk • contribs)

Is it really that difficult to sign using four tildes?

From whatever I see on your talk page, you made the page and it was subsequently deleted. The AfD was Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hilal-e-Istaqlal. Theres nothing more to be done about, recreation of the article would likely lead to speedy deletion unless you could prove that you have reliable sources, some assertion of notability and rewritten the article as per NPOV. Thanks xC | ☎ 08:54, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

HOW CAN I ADD MY SIGNETURES? LET TELL ME STEP BY STEP PROCESS BECAUSE I CANNOT UNDERSTAND THAT HOW CAN BE IT POSSIBLE.— Preceding unsigned comment added by mb2_pk (talk • contribs)

On wikipedia, we refer to signatures as your identification when you leave a comment on an article or user talk page. To sign use four tildes - ~~~~. If you can't find the tilde character on your keyboard, or it is unavailable, you can copy it from here - ~~~~

If you copy paste those four tildes onto a talk page or user page, your username and a timestamp will be substituted. For example, when I use the four tildes, it produces this - xC | ☎ 09:07, 26 May 2007 (UTC).

There is a relevant policy on this topic, please follow the link to Wikipedia:Signatures

Regards,xC | ☎ 09:07, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:BahawalPurCentralLibrary.JPG

REGARDING THIS, I WOULD LIKE TO INFORM YOU THAT ITS NOT MY CREATION I HAVE JUST UPLOADED THE PICTURE FROM THE WEB AND I HAVE NEVER CLAIMED THAT THIS IS MY CREATION. THIS PICTURE HAVE BEEN TAKEN FROM THE WEB AND AS FOR I REMEMBER, IT HAS NOT ANY COPY RIGHT OR LICESENCE

If there is no stated copyright, it is possible that it is copyrighted by the website you took it from. Further clarification would be neccessary by the person who originally took the picture. xC | ☎ 09:11, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:BahawalPurBaghdadUlJadeedRailwayStation.JPG

THIS IMAGE WAS ALSO TAKEN FROM THE WEBSITE AND HAS NOT NOMINATED FOR ANY COPY RIGHT

Don't get what you mean. If its copyright status is unclear, sooner or later it will be tagged as such, not to worry.xC | ☎ 09:13, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:HILAL-E-ISTAQLAL1a.jpg & Image tagging for Image:HILAL-E-ISTAQLAL2.jpg

THESE IMAGES WERE A POSTAGE STAMP ISSUED BY PAKISTAN POST OFFICE ISSUED IN 1966.