Talk:CityLink: Difference between revisions
Assessed as Start class |
Squall1991 (talk | contribs) Alterations of Roads |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
==Tollway== |
==Tollway== |
||
I am removing references to "Tollway" and replacing it with "tolled freeway", as it better describes the type of road. --[[User:Commking|Commking]] 03:59, 27 March 2007 (UTC) |
I am removing references to "Tollway" and replacing it with "tolled freeway", as it better describes the type of road. --[[User:Commking|Commking]] 03:59, 27 March 2007 (UTC) |
||
== Alterations of Roads == |
|||
I think that the bit about "In reality there is always an alternative to using CityLink" is a bit of propaganda (I remeber the controversy and I have heard (from a reliable source, a uni professor) the documents detailing the road contracts did contain that some roads would have to be made smaller to make sure that the motorways would be financially viable. the second bit doesn't really matter to me but the first bit does so I shall wait a few days and if noone responds I shall take it away.[[User:Squall1991|Squall1991]] 10:09, 30 May 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 10:09, 30 May 2007
![]() | Australia: Melbourne Start‑class ![]() ![]() | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Jeff's Condom
If nobody objects or posts citations soon, I'll remove the stuff of 'Jeffs Condom' - I have (a citizen of melbourne) never heard them referred to thus, and I'm not certain that it has much of a grain of truth. Any objections? Lochok 07:07, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- Never heard of Jeff's condom - get rid of it! I thought it was nicknamed the "time tunnel?", after the 70's TV series? I have heard of the cheesestick, but not "Jeff's erection", I have not heard of the "zipper", but i have heard of the "matchsticks". anybody else? --Commking 03:56, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
Tollway
I am removing references to "Tollway" and replacing it with "tolled freeway", as it better describes the type of road. --Commking 03:59, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
Alterations of Roads
I think that the bit about "In reality there is always an alternative to using CityLink" is a bit of propaganda (I remeber the controversy and I have heard (from a reliable source, a uni professor) the documents detailing the road contracts did contain that some roads would have to be made smaller to make sure that the motorways would be financially viable. the second bit doesn't really matter to me but the first bit does so I shall wait a few days and if noone responds I shall take it away.Squall1991 10:09, 30 May 2007 (UTC)