Jump to content

User talk:Steve Stefan: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Pkortge (talk | contribs)
m The Associated Schools Template
Line 71: Line 71:
Hi Steve Stefan:
Hi Steve Stefan:


I've reverted the alignment of the columns in TAS member schools ... Large numbers (especially those with commas) in tables are always right-aligned, and once this was done the "Founded" column just looked wrong also being left-aligned with "centered" being the best look.
I've reverted the alignment of the columns in TAS member schools ... Large numbers (especially those with commas) in tables are always right-aligned, and once this was done the "Founded" column just looked wrong also being left-aligned with "centered" being the best look. [[User:Pkortge|Pkortge]] 13:56, 28 May 2007 (UTC)


[[User:Pkortge|Pkortge]] 13:56, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
:I've again reverted your edits and right aligned the numbers columns. Columns of numbers are always right aligned ! [[User:Pkortge|Pkortge]] 09:09, 9 June 2007 (UTC)


== May 2007 ==
== May 2007 ==
Line 81: Line 81:


{{{icon|[[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px]] }}}Please do not add [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|unsourced or original content]]{{{{{subst|}}}#if:Public Schools Association|, as you did to [[:Public Schools Association]]}}. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox.{{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-unsourced3 --> The content you added was a direct copyvio from a previous article where the community consensus was delete. The readdition of the content of this article is not only flying in the face of community consensus, but also is a breach of the GFDL which all contributions to Wikipedia are made under requiring all editor contributions to be appropriately recognised. [[User:Thewinchester|Thewinchester]] [[User_talk:Thewinchester|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 05:24, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
{{{icon|[[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px]] }}}Please do not add [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|unsourced or original content]]{{{{{subst|}}}#if:Public Schools Association|, as you did to [[:Public Schools Association]]}}. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox.{{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-unsourced3 --> The content you added was a direct copyvio from a previous article where the community consensus was delete. The readdition of the content of this article is not only flying in the face of community consensus, but also is a breach of the GFDL which all contributions to Wikipedia are made under requiring all editor contributions to be appropriately recognised. [[User:Thewinchester|Thewinchester]] [[User_talk:Thewinchester|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 05:24, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

== [[Template:The_Associated_Schools|The Associated Schools Template]] ==

I've again changed the school names back to their full names - as originally created by template originator [[User:Loopla]]. Your continued edits to this template are now bordering on vandalism. [[User:Pkortge|Pkortge]] 09:09, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:09, 9 June 2007

Blanking page

If you are planning to be a regular member of the wikipedia community, blanking talk pages can be seen by some as a sure sign of someone who is not regularly in complete understanding of how we communicate within the project of making an online encyclopedia. SatuSuro 23:40, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mayors of Perth

You have introduced a few wild cards there, I would strongly suggest that you look at each link that you have created there, and perhaps re-consider how you might improve the edit. SatuSuro 23:40, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant repetitions are usually edited out without mercy - City of Perth was all that was needed - as it contains sufficient qualifiers, the next four links are not needed! SatuSuro 23:44, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop

You are introducing something in all those pages which are considered redundant repetitions. SatuSuro 00:03, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK

First, please sign your messages (have you had a proper welcome message yet? )- please try this one-


Welcome!

Hello, Steve Stefan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! 

Please note I havent checked each entry

  • - but you have gone into the pags and reverted the 'see also' - and added unnecessary links.

In the case of The Perth one, City of Perth is all that you need to place there - the following links/qualifiers are not needed... the qualifier which you are adding externally is sufficiently covered in the city of Perth link

Also please do not add my messages from here back to my talk page - it is not needed. Thanks SatuSuro 00:14, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Hi Steve,
I think what SatuSuro is trying to say is that too much context creates redundancy. For example, I understand why you want to link to both Western Australia and Australia, but "Western Australia, Australia" reads terribly. I've reworked the lead sentence in List of Mayors and Lord Mayors of Perth; consider doing the same on the other mayoral lists you've updated.
Also, you may not be aware that there has been strenuous disagreement recently over whether years should be linked. The manual of style says:
"There is consensus among editors that bare month and day names should not be linked unless there is a specific reason that the link will help the reader to understand the article. There is less agreement about links to years. Some editors believe that links to years are generally useful to establish context for the article. Others believe that links to years are rarely useful to the reader and reduce the readability of the text. Another possibility is to link to a more specific article about that year, for example [[2006 in sports|2006]], although some people find this unintuitive because the link leads to an unexpected destination."
but this paragraph fails to capture just how strongly some editors fell about it. The issue seems to have lapsed into an uneasy truce whereby each side promises not to link or delink years en masse. If you don't want someone to bite your head off, it would be advisable not to link years en masse until the dispute is resolved.
Hesperian 00:20, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Beaconhills

Hi, thanks for adding the GIS link to Beaconhills. Hope you can help improve the article. Crested Penguin 08:59, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

MiniProject PSA

Hello, i have noted your edit to the Public Schools Association page and you have been invited to join the Public Schools Association (PSA) MiniProject. More information on the project can be found at its homepage - User:Twenty Years/PSA. We would love to have you on board! Twenty Years 11:25, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to Girls Sport Victoria (GSV) Sports Champions (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 22:46, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

City of Stonnington and Lauriston Girls' School

I see that you have reverted my change to the link for Lauriston Girls' School in the article on the City of Stonnington. I agree that the apostraphe is the grammatically correct usage, but I was avoiding the rediredct because the article's title did not use it. I have moved the page to the correct this. Blarneytherinosaur talk 02:00, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

The Working Man's Barnstar
I hereby award this to Steve Stefan for your fine contributions to Australian school articles Twenty Years 10:10, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep up the great work. Twenty Years 10:10, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Associated Schools

Hi Steve Stefan:

I've reverted the alignment of the columns in TAS member schools ... Large numbers (especially those with commas) in tables are always right-aligned, and once this was done the "Founded" column just looked wrong also being left-aligned with "centered" being the best look. Pkortge 13:56, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've again reverted your edits and right aligned the numbers columns. Columns of numbers are always right aligned ! Pkortge 09:09, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

May 2007

Please assume good faith when dealing with other editors, which you did not on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Public Schools Association Sports Champions. Thank you. Thewinchester (talk) 04:48, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow or move it unilaterally while discussion about it is underway, as you did to Public Schools Association Sports Champions. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Thank you. A copy-paste move is bad, and breaches WP's rules and policies which require every contribution is attributed to it's original author. Thewinchester (talk) 06:31, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Public Schools Association. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. The content you added was a direct copyvio from a previous article where the community consensus was delete. The readdition of the content of this article is not only flying in the face of community consensus, but also is a breach of the GFDL which all contributions to Wikipedia are made under requiring all editor contributions to be appropriately recognised. Thewinchester (talk) 05:24, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've again changed the school names back to their full names - as originally created by template originator User:Loopla. Your continued edits to this template are now bordering on vandalism. Pkortge 09:09, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]