User talk:Mariokempes

Welcome!

Hello, Mariokempes, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!  The Ogre 19:42, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Your edits.

XGusta- I don't appreciate the tone and rigidity of your response on the talk:Argentina pages. But that is a minor point... Enough with your sock puppets, various anonymous IP numbers or otherwise. I can prove they are all you. If you have something to say, say it yourself. Consider yourself warned! Mariokempes 16:14, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Accusing people of sockpupperty is a grave thing and should not be taken lightly. Just because most people do not agree with you doesnt mean they are my puppets. We get many IP users every day. I also do not appericate your tone of voice and constantly disrespect you show, it is going to take a lot especially from pervious edits to change that, but you need to stop, because if you are treating me like this, I will treat you the same way! Offical sources are offical sources if you have anything revelant from 2006 and above saying other wise please say so other wise you are wasting my time.(XGustaX 16:18, 4 May 2007 (UTC))

They are too and I can prove it. You are warned! Mariokempes 16:21, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Please refrain from empty threats and abuse of other people on Wikipedia, it simply against the rules of wikipedia. If you want to have civil conversation then do so.(XGustaX 16:25, 4 May 2007 (UTC))

The source says that ""95% of the population is white and most are descendants of Italians and Spaniards. As a result of the massive European immigration"" There for I am adding it to clarify. This is nothing about comproises this is what the sources say. You keep thinking Arab means white and althought techinally right, it does, In Argentina Arabs and whites are two different things. I am not the only one who disagrees with your edits as Mariano has also removed what we have discussed before [1].(XGustaX 17:39, 11 May 2007 (UTC))

Your comment "You keep thinking Arab means white " is NOT the point (I won't even go there!). There are other valid sources that point to as low as 80% "white"[2]. I'm not saying I support with that claim (I have no basis to one way or the other), but it exists and it IS authoritative. If you want to say 80-97% (depending on the source) than you can say "European" and you will not be misleading. Another approach is to drop this % crap and just say it is overwhelmingly European. Period. Mariokempes 18:23, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Are you completely out of it or are you really that ignorant, that you havnt read your own article you are citing. For starters it says 89 precent! HA! Secondly, if you read above this Survery which is what it is it is NOT a census, It says "If we cannot let people classify themselves, then the alternative is to let others do it. The Los Medios y Mercados de Latinoamérica study is a pan-Latin American survey in which interviewers are sent to interview a representative sample of people in their homes. As part of the interviewing process, the interviewer is required to classify the respondents into one (and only one) of seven racial categories: white, black, indigenous, mulatto, mestizo, asian and "Don't know". Of course, this is not an exact science since there is no way to train people to classify 'correctly' (whatever that means) and/or 'reliably' (in the sense that different interviewers should come up with the same result). For example, the difference between 'Indigenous' and 'Indian' may be less of a genetic issue than one about dress code. That is to say, we freely admit that the results that we will present in the following are 'junk' science." This is a nothing but a survey anyone can do this, Do you even know what athouratative means, dude, because you are obviously completely stubborn to even say this is athouratative Source because it is not. You obviously have no clue what an Authoratative source is. You need stop being so stubborn. Most people do not agree with you get over it. Or get out.(XGustaX 18:29, 11 May 2007 (UTC))

Wow... you spotted a typo. OK say 89%-97%, nothing else changes. Mariokempes 18:43, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Wow... you are an idiot. A typo that you did twice... right. Anyways The source is unathouratative. You can't compare a survey done by a company on only a few hundred people authoratative to the CIA world fact book or even better a National Census. Since surveys will always give you different results since not all 40 million Argentines were interviewed. I think you need to read this link because you obviously do not know what Authoratative means. This falls under the wikipedia rule of [3] under ""Self-published sources (online and paper)"". Again you need to stop being stubborn. Because Me, Mariano, and most people on the talk page do not agree with you.Get over it, and stop being immature about it!(XGustaX 18:47, 11 May 2007 (UTC))

Have you finished re-editing your own personal attacks on my talk page? I will not accept this from you or anyone else. Los Medios y Mercados de Latinoamérica are "...a well-known, professional researcher (scholarly or non-scholarly) in a relevant field". If you want to discuss this further, take it to the talk:argentina page where others can contribute. Stay away from here. Mariokempes

And I will not be talked to in such a rude and threating way. You are the one uses this tone of voice so there fore I will! A survey is not a reiable method of finding the population of countries demographics it is interesting to look at but it is not. So do not tell me whether this authoratative or not. Surveys are highly flawed leaving out many people. So do not come with this crap. I have already said what I wanted to say on the talk page and until you start listening I will not stop using your talk page as this is the right way to settle this once and for all. Besides you fail to listen to everybodies critizism of the survey on the talk page. Why bother. No I think ill stick to this.(XGustaX 19:18, 11 May 2007 (UTC))

Who is "everyone else"???? You (and your puppets) are the only one(s) arguing without reason. In addition, I have not been rude except for my early post on this subject, where you made reverts without an ounce of discussion (for which I then apologised). You really test me, and I have been far too civil with you. I am on Wikipedia because it is supposed to be fun. You, my friend, are resorting to personal attacks and seem unable to carry a civil, meaningful dialogue. I really think you need to re-read all the posts prior because you miss the point entirely. Do not respond... I have had it with you... just like others before me that have given up, I throw my hands in the air. I mean it- DO NOT respond... I will ignore it. Someone else down the road will deal with you. Good bye!!! Mariokempes 20:42, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

You have threated me from day One! So do not start. You have also entirly missed MY point. Please you have no right when other people clearly go against what you think you get all offended. You only look at others but fail to realize your self you have also had a rude and obxious tone with me pretty much the entire time we have talked. Do you really expect to forget that? No I wont. This is your idea of fun aruging online with someone you dont even know on an issue that REALLY doesnt matter? Geez, were can I sign up for the fun to begin? Maybe you should think about what you do everyday.(XGustaX 20:55, 11 May 2007 (UTC))

I know you are online. Answer me.(XGustaX 16:26, 14 May 2007 (UTC))

I know you are. (XGustaX 19:35, 14 May 2007 (UTC))

I know you are online. Answer me.(XGustaX 22:06, 15 May 2007 (UTC))

What ever happened to Ignoring me? LOL...(XGustaX 23:01, 28 May 2007 (UTC))

No hard feelings? Right. If that is case then you have no life, then again your on here every day for hours on end. Stop vandalizing my talk page. (XGustaX 23:52, 28 May 2007 (UTC))

Architecture

Thanks for the encouragement! I noticed that because it is of major importance, it's targetted for publication, and I thought it needed a cleanup. Very slack about proper quotations etc. I'm just reading a series of essays on Alberti and trying to decide what I can slot in that is concise and precise. The essays all interpret his writing in slightly different ways.

I'm not going to write more about practice because I think the article Architect does it. Well, at least, I don't think I'm going to, but then, Ive got this great description about Alberti defining the role of architect. Really, he defined the role better than he defined the subject. I think I'm going to have to put it like that. Right... --Amandajm 04:25, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Re: T587

Hi: I've just been going through his/her contributions, it does seem a bit coincidental that they match up with your recent contributions some what. I already posted a level 3 warning on his talk page. BrianGV ^talk 23:32, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Re:T587

Yeh.. seems that it might be. sockpuppet ? BrianGV ^talk 23:40, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

I reported after he/she vandalized after final warning. BrianGV ^talk 23:48, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Reminder

You are close to being in violation of the 3 revert rule on Demographics of Argentina. Please be careful when it comes to reverting others. Thanks. --Woohookitty^Woohoo! 06:34, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Argentina

I am really starting to get sick and tried how you treat people on Wikipedia just because they do not agree with. Saying that most Argentines are ashamed of the Mestizo label is just plain wrong but not only that you do not have a WP:RS source backing it up. You must follow concensus policy on Wikipedia and if you fail to do so, you will be dealt with accordingly. I warn you and beg you to stop before I am forced to do something I wish not to do. (DoubleNine 16:23, 22 May 2007 (UTC))

There is no double posting allowed on the same or simular talk pages.(DoubleNine 17:39, 22 May 2007 (UTC))

User:XGustaX will be dealt with accordingly as well. However, he has backed down, you must take your warning into account as well or else you will be blocked.(DoubleNine 18:00, 22 May 2007 (UTC))

Please assume good faith in your dealings with other editors. Please stop being uncivil to your fellow editors; instead, assume that they are here to improve Wikipedia.

Rules of Wikipedia state someone from the outside shall deal with conflict such as happened. XGustaX has seemed to back down and you are the only one who seems shows great hostility towards others on there Talk pages. You have broken Wikipedia's rules many times now and this WILL be the last warning you will. I have given you the warnings I am suppose to if you violate them once more you Will be Block from editing on Wikipedia. Consider this your final Warning. (DoubleNine 19:23, 22 May 2007 (UTC))

If you need assistance with your disputes, I may be willing to lend a hand. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 19:30, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for giving me a heads up. I sleep during the day (US time) so I didn't see this until just now. --Woohookitty^Woohoo! 03:01, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

ambrosian

thanks for your corrections in religion paragrah about Milan. Therefore the use of ambrosian in milanese church is not faclutative, but in these church neither was in use the gregorian one, nor is used today. The ambrosian is just the officially chant. I added the (requested?) links to PIEM and (If is useful) an external link to ambrosian

IMO should be interesting also tell the archibishop of Milan is a capo rito, I mean, it can change or the liturgy, unique case in western catholic church

(and may be in eastern - I asked about but I have obtained some dubitative response, in a near future I can tell some other about this specific case of oriental rite).

I should be grateful if you will have the patience to revise again the grammar ;-) Thanks in advance L--Lorenzo Fratti 00:48, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Yay

I hereby award you a Barnstar for being as diligent as myself in reverting the vandalism of articles such as those of Italy! Congratulations. Maybe I could use one myself? :). Sicilianmandolin 01:12, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Thank you very much!

I am delighted! I was recently alarmed to see that there is/was no article on Italian Renaissance painting, so that is my current project. Hope you realy enjoy your wiki editting!

--Amandajm 23:53, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Architecture

I like your rewrite of that paragraph on the industrial revolution. --Amandajm 03:20, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Architecture

I think it's fine. Now, what about the challenge over there at Architectural History. Do you feel up to it?? The page is dominated by the Taj Mahal. (Why do people do that?) Anyway, someone needs to fix it, and it might be you! I have my little painting project underway at Italian Renaissance painting and Italian Renaissance painting, development of themes and after that, if I can muster the reserve, I'm going to get stuck into various aspects of Gothic. And maybe tidy up a few painters' biographies. Good luck! --Amandajm 08:01, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

OK, let's just put it on the "to be done" list for a bit. --Amandajm 02:09, 13 June 2007 (UTC)