Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Napoleon Dynamite (character): Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
*'''Redirect''' to film article. It's not like that character is popular to the extent that professional analysis on the character has been performed and published.--[[User:Kylohk|Kylohk]] 16:03, 13 June 2007 (UTC) |
*'''Redirect''' to film article. It's not like that character is popular to the extent that professional analysis on the character has been performed and published.--[[User:Kylohk|Kylohk]] 16:03, 13 June 2007 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' per nom. [[User:Jacroe | Jac]]<sub>[[User_talk:Jacroe | roe]]</sub> 20:30, 13 June 2007 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' per nom. [[User:Jacroe | Jac]]<sub>[[User_talk:Jacroe | roe]]</sub> 20:30, 13 June 2007 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' It isn't good enough for a delete. If you could choke an article, that would be good enough. -_-. [[User:Toasty!|Toasty! | Available at your local store]] 23:28, 13 June 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:28, 13 June 2007
- Napoleon Dynamite (character) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Copy-paste job from the main article Napoleon Dynamite. Except for some very minor formatting changes this is essentially taken word-for-word from the "Characters" section of that article. Additionally it's been tagged for cleanup since March with no help. Nothing to merge here as the text is already identical, no need for a redirect as it's an unlikely search term and only one incoming link aside from the parent article. Arkyan • (talk) 21:16, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nom.--Ispy1981 22:41, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Strong Delete redundant Rackabello 22:56, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Philippe 23:14, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nom & per WP:FICT. Carlossuarez46 16:11, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. If it had additional/different information, it may have been interesting, but I agree with the nomination; it's unnecessary. María (habla conmigo) 12:50, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete because this is a fictional character from a single film. Real-world context for this character can be established on the film article itself. Preserve nothing; it's basically personal observations from the film itself. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 14:25, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
- Redirect to film article. It's not like that character is popular to the extent that professional analysis on the character has been performed and published.--Kylohk 16:03, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Jac roe 20:30, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete It isn't good enough for a delete. If you could choke an article, that would be good enough. -_-. Toasty! | Available at your local store 23:28, 13 June 2007 (UTC)