User talk:Six and Four: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Six and Four (talk | contribs) →Fellowship of Friends/31March2007: cm to ReyBrujo |
Six and Four (talk | contribs) ←Blanked the page |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Signpost-subscription}} |
|||
When someone edits the page, and the edit is not constructive, revert the edit and leave a message to the person who made that edit saying that the edit was not constructive. Leave me a message for more information. [[User:Han Amos|<b><font color="#FF9933" face="monotype">Amos Han</font></b>]] <sup>[[User_talk:Han Amos|<font color="#00FF00">Talk</font>]]</sup> 23:03, 31 March 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== Sockpupettry == |
|||
Hi Mario |
|||
On the talk page of [[Talk:Fellowship of Friends|Fellowship of Friends]], I offered Wikipedia's best way for how to resolve these disputes (basically [[WP:RS]]); sadly, this was basically ignored and [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:Fellowship_of_Friends&diff=prev&oldid=119988915 very] [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AFellowship_of_Friends&diff=119922919&oldid=119876613 obvious] [[WP:SOCK|sockpuppetry]] was resorted to instead, by people who held the high ground in the dispute. This led to the page being unprotected at your request and the edit war kicking off again, as it would when underhand methods are being used. |
|||
For that reason, I don't feel able to help with containing the renewed edit war. Dispute resolution when the party who are in the right resort to disrupting Wikipedia is not my forte. You will need to seek help from [[WP:DR|the various formal and informal dispute resolution facilities]] that Wikipedia offers. <small><span style="border: 1px solid #F00; background-color:gold;">'''[[User:Redvers| REDVERS]]''' ↔ [[User talk:Redvers|SЯEVDEЯ ]]</span></small> 21:13, 9 April 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:If you've only recently written to Redvers, it could be helpful to wait a little longer and see if he will answer your questions. In order to confirm suspected sockpuppetry, you can post a request [[WP:RFCU|here]]. Remember to provide diffs that indicate the existence of illegal sockpuppetry, as explained in the instructions at the top of the page. Regards, [[User:Redux|Redux]] 21:42, 10 April 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== Sockpuppet == |
|||
One way of finding out if there are sockpuppets on a page is by taking the request to [[WP:RFCU]]. [[User:Jayjg|Jayjg ]]<sup><small><font color="DarkGreen">[[User_talk:Jayjg|(talk)]]</font></small></sup> 21:55, 12 April 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== Library search engine == |
|||
Dear Mario, |
|||
The Library has a search engine at the top of its home page, at [http://www.loc.gov/index.html Library of Congress]. However, I failed at using it, for instance, by feeding it with a Copyright Registration Number. I also tried it by feeding it with "Merchant of Venice" and it lead me to 500 results with various different places containing files quoting this work. |
|||
I recommend to use the different resources' links on the right margin. For instance, there is a link to the Copyright Office. Clicking there, you will find a "Search Copyright Records" page. Once there, you can choose among "Books, Music, etc", "Serials" and "Documents." |
|||
Regarding the Fellowship of Friends, there are several books you can find there, searching under "Claimant." Good luck. |
|||
Regards, [[User:Baby Dove|Baby Dove]] 21:14, 12 April 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== Regarding purpose of the organization, beliefs, predictions and other subjects == |
|||
Mario Fantoni: |
|||
In a discussion that arose over the weekend, I remember you said that you were going to "ask the Fellowship's authorities" regarding these delicate subjects, originating many personal opinions in the page. Can you tell us whether you have any news regarding all these affairs? |
|||
Regards, [[User:Baby Dove|Baby Dove]] 21:51, 3 May 2007 (UTC) |
|||
==FOF== |
|||
You need to explain [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Fellowship_of_Friends#Proof_of_Advertising here]. PS Although this might turn intense, I won't be back in a day or so, so I might not respond for a little while [[User:Aeuio|Aeuio]] 01:18, 6 May 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:I have contacted Coren to see if he was just busy for a short bit or needs someone else to step in. If he does not respond in a day or two, I will offer my assistance as an informal mediator. [[User:Vassyana|Vassyana]] 02:31, 9 May 2007 (UTC) |
|||
==Sockpuppeting== |
|||
Please see FoF talk page as I have proved certain things and request a checkuser on you and Baby Dove. [[User:Aeuio|Aeuio]] 02:18, 15 May 2007 (UTC) |
|||
==License tagging for Image:PIC004.jpg== |
|||
Thanks for uploading [[:Image:PIC004.jpg]]. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an [[Wikipedia:Image copyright tags|image tag]] applied to the [[Wikipedia:Image description page|image description page]] indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images. |
|||
For more information on using images, see the following pages: |
|||
* [[Wikipedia:Image use policy]] |
|||
* [[Wikipedia:Image copyright tags]] |
|||
This is an automated notice by [[User:OrphanBot|OrphanBot]]. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions]]. 07:11, 22 May 2007 (UTC) |
|||
Nice pictures Mario :) Thanks [[User:Wine-in-ark|Wine-in-ark]] 19:17, 22 May 2007 (UTC) |
|||
==Image copyright problem with Image:Prieure.jpg== |
|||
Thanks for uploading [[:Image:Prieure.jpg]]. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate [[WP:ICT|copyright tag]], it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well. |
|||
For more information on using images, see the following pages: |
|||
* [[Wikipedia:Image use policy]] |
|||
* [[Wikipedia:Image copyright tags]] |
|||
This is an automated notice by [[User:OrphanBot|OrphanBot]]. For assistance on the image use policy, see [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions]]. 08:45, 25 May 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== Mario, [[Wikipedia:Please_do_not_bite_the_newcomers|please do not bite the newcomers]] == |
|||
Please don't answer someone's comments with one line which gives a question, and therefore automatically dismiss their argument. [[User:Aeuio|Aeuio]] 13:29, 3 June 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== Fellowship of Friends/31March2007 == |
|||
I have deleted [[Fellowship of Friends/31March2007]], I don't see why it should exist at all since [[Fellowship of Friends]] already exists. Cheers! -- [[User:ReyBrujo|ReyBrujo]] 04:00, 4 June 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:Oh, I don't have any problem with it being in your user namespace. But putting it in the main namespace (where anyone can reach by clicking [[Special:Random]]) is not good. If you do changes, though, I suggest you editing the article directly. Otherwise, some day you will slap a full new version in the article, and nobody will be able to see the different modifications through time you did in order to reach the current status (which can be considered a violation to the GNU Free Documentation License under which Wikipedia is built. -- [[User:ReyBrujo|ReyBrujo]] 04:38, 4 June 2007 (UTC) |
|||
I got it - thanks for the explanation. [[User:Mario Fantoni|Mario Fantoni]] 05:16, 4 June 2007 (UTC) |
|||