Talk:WWE brand extension: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
just deleting what I said |
||
Line 122: | Line 122: | ||
::Viscera has now been drafted to ECW. [[User:Hermiod|Hermiod]]. Raw just picked The Sandman from ECW |
::Viscera has now been drafted to ECW. [[User:Hermiod|Hermiod]]. Raw just picked The Sandman from ECW |
||
::Hardcore Holly back to Smackdown |
::Hardcore Holly back to Smackdown |
||
well thank you for telling me but why is it that nobody is updating this in the supplementary draft in the article |
Revision as of 18:22, 17 June 2007
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the WWE brand extension article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
Where all the other draft picks? I know Simon Dean and some other lower-carders were traded in 2005.
how many no way out's have there been
8: 1998, 2000-2006
This article I believe is factually inaccurate about the nWo and WCW brand extension idea. The nWo was to take over Nitro and WCW Thunder and Saturday Night/Worldwide were to be the WCW programs. This article has it the other way around, plus the idea came 11 months after the nWo only Souled Out PPV was a commercial and critical flop (although an interesting experiment, and Raw is War ripped off the stage and a number of presentation techniques used).
"Critism" (sic) section
I removed it as it was written like a rant with absolutely no authenticity and with plenty of spelling mistakes to boot. --59.92.56.55 13:28, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
5th anniversary of WWE Brand Extension
2007 marks the 5th anniversary of WWE Brand Extension.134.124.143.149 15:30, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
Next?
When is the next draft lottery? should it be noted as a future event? 217.44.2.148 09:50, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
draft lottery 2007
Is there going to be a draft lottery this year i would think so because there a three brands making more talent available...??Nosaints4life 00:22, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
It is official, there will be a Draft this year, it wil be on june 11th, confirmed by the USA network. USA network confirms Draft Lottery 2007
Merge
I believe the two articles should be separate as they are two different subjects. The draft is only a tool used after the brand split to shuffle Superstars around. It is also becoming an annual event whereas the brand split occurred only twice (the first time between Raw and Smackdown and the second time when ECW was added). 24.89.69.22 17:46, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- Immediately after making the above comments, Nick Butler merged the articles anyway. Is there not supposed to be a process before articles are merged? 24.89.69.22 17:49, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
LOCKED
This article should be locked or sumthing bEcause people keep creating seperate articles OF THE DRAFT LOTTERY AND BRAND EXTENSION. WHEN THEY ARE THE SAME THING.
2007 draft
does anyone know if injured wrestlers are gonna participate in the draft?? (ex: Triple H, HBK, King Booker etc). J.C. 05:23, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
king booker will with queen sharmell hell probsve 2 raw dunno any1 else tho!!¬¬
should be. 86.139.175.13 16:53, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
[1] Read the part about King Booker and Sharmell...J.C. 23:02, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
ESPN Radio
Can someone please put a reference stating that ESPN Radio will actually cover this. I seriously doubt it, but I would like to see proof if it is true.
Interbrand Competition
Shouldn't Michaels vs Angle be under that catagory instead of Lashley. The feud was interpromotional and spanned several ppv's including WrestleMania.
2007 Draft
if The Boogeyman went to ECW, shouldn't the Little Boogeyman go with him as well?? J.C. 03:45, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
- He didn't come out with The Boogeyman, so we can't assume it. Both Runjin Singh and Queen Sharmell came out with their picks. It's possible they used the Mark Henry incident on SmackDown to phase out the Little Boogeyman character. Lrrr IV 03:46, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
I think that this should be the box used for the 2007 draft, as it contains the matchups in question as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sepmix (talk • contribs)
Match and Draft Results | |
---|---|
Edge beat John Cena via countout | The Great Khali and Runjin Singh to Smackdown! |
CM Punk beat Carlito | The Boogeyman to ECW |
Umaga beat Balls Mahoney | King Booker and Queen Sharmell to RAW |
Bobby Lashley beat Chris Benoit | Chris Benoit to ECW |
MVP beat Santino Marella | Torrie Wilson to Smackdown! |
The Miz beat Snitsky via decision reversal | Chris Masters to Smackdown! |
Candice Michelle beat Kristal | Bobby Lashley to RAW |
Batista beat Jeff Hardy and Elijah Burke in a triple threat match | Ric Flair to Smackdown! |
Randy Orton won a Battle Royal to win 2 draft picks | Snitsky and Mr. Kennedy to RAW |
- 1)Qualifying matches (which these basically are) aren't relevent to the draft itself, which the article is about. 2)Notice how the table looks nothing like the standard table used everywhere else in the article. I see no reason to use it. Lrrr IV 22:36, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
Each table doesn't have to look identical, you sir, are starting irritate me. User:Sepmix 11.43pm GMT
- Please sign your posts, it is not difficult to do (if you do not know how, you type ~~~~). The page does look nicer when the tables conform to each other, and I don't think those matches are needed. You have not said why you think those matches should be included. Lrrr IV 01:00, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
Me too. The reason the other tables looked the same is because they were conducted the same way. Each side had a set number of picks, and they each took turns. This year, however, the draft was conducted differently. You can't use the previous table setup because you'll either lose the draft order, or as another possible setup was shown, have too many empty cells. The best possible setup for each draft should be used. As for the matches, I think it should be included as it was a determination in which draft pick went where, although I've kind of been on the side of "draft picks ONLY", so I can see it going the otherway. Mshake3 01:01, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
PostPone
the Draft on 6/13 is changed to 6/17 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.167.241.220 (talk • contribs)
- The date is already mentioned in the article. Lrrr IV 21:32, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
Kevin Nash?
--124.179.248.152 08:32, 13 June 2007 (UTC) why is kevin nash included in this list? he still wrestles for TNA. I think somebody needs to correct this
June 2006 (Brand Extension: ECW)
Isn't this wrong? It looks like RVD went to Raw and kurt Amgle went to Smackdown. They should both be under the ECW Table heading 220.244.235.241 10:08, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
- Good point. Change made. Mshake3 16:48, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
Hey, shouldn't The Big Show be on this list, he went to ECW the same time these guys did as well.
- He wasn't drafted, he came over on his own. --PandoraX
Supplementary Draft
Now the 10 picks have offically decided back on 6/11/07.what if RAW superstars/divas going to Smackdown or ECW, Smackdown superstars/divas headed to RAW or ECW & ECW superstars/divas moving to RAW or Smackdown in supplementary draft? i'll have to wait and find out.12.127.178.158 23:07, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
supplementary draft pick
Why did somebody put viscera and val venis for smackdown it doesnt mention it on wwe.com