Talk:Ministry of Jesus: Difference between revisions
scope of article |
ethic of reciprocity and the great commandment |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Is this article "Ministry of Jesus according to the gospels considered at face value"? or "Ministry of the historical Jesus, epsecially as depicted more or less accurately in religious accounts"? [[User:Jonathan Tweet|Jonathan Tweet]] 20:05, 24 February 2007 (UTC) |
Is this article "Ministry of Jesus according to the gospels considered at face value"? or "Ministry of the historical Jesus, epsecially as depicted more or less accurately in religious accounts"? [[User:Jonathan Tweet|Jonathan Tweet]] 20:05, 24 February 2007 (UTC) |
||
==ethic of reciprocity== |
|||
"The second commandment, essentially a formulation of the ethic of reciprocity,..." I think this statement is incorrect. The Golden Rule is fundamentally flawed because it assumes that all humans have the same interests. E.g., a masochist may derive joy from suffering pain, but that does not, according to Matthew 22:39, give her the right to inflict pain on others, although she would be complying with the Golden Rule. --[[User:71.82.97.218|71.82.97.218]] 02:13, 20 June 2007 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 02:13, 20 June 2007
Some Grammatical Stuph
ok..
"Ofcourse it is VERY valid to add that according to the Roman Sence that happened circa the Time when Jesus was born shows no existence of any city within the roman empire called Nazareth. Then why is Jesus Called Jesus of NAzareth? Well, that was born due to a missconceprion of the term Nazerene. Nazerene was a sect within the Jewish people with strong helenistic tendencies. Jesus's Familly was part of this sect and the bible cuotes that Jesus was in fact a Nazerene. So the actual transaction would be Jesus the Nazerene and not Jesus of Nazarteh... Therefore we must think of that considering that Jesus was born in Nazarteh."
This needs to be verified and cleaned up, the english is terrible - no offense to whoever wrote it. --Defiant103 17:15, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
scope of article
Is this article "Ministry of Jesus according to the gospels considered at face value"? or "Ministry of the historical Jesus, epsecially as depicted more or less accurately in religious accounts"? Jonathan Tweet 20:05, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
ethic of reciprocity
"The second commandment, essentially a formulation of the ethic of reciprocity,..." I think this statement is incorrect. The Golden Rule is fundamentally flawed because it assumes that all humans have the same interests. E.g., a masochist may derive joy from suffering pain, but that does not, according to Matthew 22:39, give her the right to inflict pain on others, although she would be complying with the Golden Rule. --71.82.97.218 02:13, 20 June 2007 (UTC)