Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quizzing.co.uk: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 00:44, 24 June 2007

Non-noteable website. Un-sourced also. Is this advertising? Dalejenkins 17:43, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-notable site. Corpx 19:45, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:WEB and WP:N. --Nonstopdrivel 20:47, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments (These are my views) I used to work for the company before being unfairly banned from its events and events run on its behalf. I run a web site they consider to be a rival. The talk page is extensive, and contains information about the origin of the article and how it was hijacked into a non-NPOV advert. It is still disputed, but the approach taken by the company and its supporters equates to them having decided they own the article, and thus censor any criticism (of which there is plenty). Anybody not towing the party line seems to be regarded as a competitor, and unfit to make edits to the article. The Wikipedia 'rule' that you shouldn't edit articles about yourself or your company seems to be ignored. I am sure there will be many Keep opinions in this AfD, as the word will get out about it. Given my position I feel I can only really comment. Jw6aa 00:44, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 *'''Delete''' Non-notable site.  [[User:Corpx|Corpx]] 19:45, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
 *'''Delete''' per [[WP:WEB]] and [[WP:N]]. --[[User:Nonstopdrivel|Nonstopdrivel]] 20:47, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
+*'''Comments''' (These are my views) I used to work for the company before being unfairly banned from its events and events run on its behalf. I run a web site they consider to be a rival. The talk page is extensive, and contains information about the origin of the article and how it was hijacked into a non-NPOV advert. It is still disputed, but the approach taken by the company and its supporters equates to them having decided they own the article, and thus censor any criticism (of which there is plenty). Anybody not towing the party line seems to be regarded as a competitor, and unfit to make edits to the article. The Wikipedia 'rule' that you shouldn't edit articles about yourself or your company seems to be ignored. I am sure there will be many Keep opinions in this AfD, as the word will get out about it. Given my position I feel I can only really comment. [[User:Jw6aa|Jw6aa]] 00:44, 24 June 2007 (UTC)