Talk:Tom Cruise: Unauthorized: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
rm my own bits of misplaced confusion |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
::::Ha, no, not explicitly sarcasm. I meant moreso that I believe the forthcoming legal action, sure to occur, will be interesting and very public, thus making it easily documentable in a fine article. Further, I've noted one of our first issues: When searching Tom Cruise, this does not come up, not even on a disambiguation in a "To see other" link underneath his name on the Tom Cruise page. Just a thought... [[User:Raeft|Raeft]] 20:59, 26 March 2007 (UTC) |
::::Ha, no, not explicitly sarcasm. I meant moreso that I believe the forthcoming legal action, sure to occur, will be interesting and very public, thus making it easily documentable in a fine article. Further, I've noted one of our first issues: When searching Tom Cruise, this does not come up, not even on a disambiguation in a "To see other" link underneath his name on the Tom Cruise page. Just a thought... [[User:Raeft|Raeft]] 20:59, 26 March 2007 (UTC) |
||
dont forget hes crazy |
|||
Revision as of 07:02, 1 July 2007
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Tom Cruise: Unauthorized article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | Books Stub‑class | ||||||
| |||||||
See also
The See also section here is relevant, it references topics that deal with Cruise, and will be expanded upon. Smee 04:38, 26 March 2007 (UTC).
- Hmm, have to agree with you there. It's funny, my potential list of pages to watch is starting to look like I'm stalking certain people, you included Smee. I believe it may be a case of similar interests. Nice page here, and nice work. Now to expand it as things occur in relation. I'm waiting for a lawsuit. Raeft 17:43, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
- I do not understand? Was that last bit sarcasm? Smee 18:02, 26 March 2007 (UTC).
- "Nice page here, and nice work. Now to expand it as things occur in relation." - But thank you very much for those kind words, that means a lot! Smee 18:17, 26 March 2007 (UTC).
- I do not understand? Was that last bit sarcasm? Smee 18:02, 26 March 2007 (UTC).
- Ha, no, not explicitly sarcasm. I meant moreso that I believe the forthcoming legal action, sure to occur, will be interesting and very public, thus making it easily documentable in a fine article. Further, I've noted one of our first issues: When searching Tom Cruise, this does not come up, not even on a disambiguation in a "To see other" link underneath his name on the Tom Cruise page. Just a thought... Raeft 20:59, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
dont forget hes crazy