Jump to content

Talk:Open and closed maps: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
HyDeckar (talk | contribs)
t
HyDeckar (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
Forgive me if I'm mistaken, but in general, preimages of closed sets being closed does not ensure continuity. E.g. for f: [0,1] -> (0,1] where f(x) = x (for x != 0) and f(0) = 1/2, f is not continuous. Perhaps something is assumed that I missed?
Forgive me if I'm mistaken, but in general, preimages of closed sets being closed does not ensure continuity. E.g. for f: [0,1] -> (0,1] where f(x) = x (for x != 0) and f(0) = 1/2, f is not continuous. Perhaps something is assumed that I missed?
[[User:203.150.100.189|203.150.100.189]] 08:38, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
[[User:203.150.100.189|203.150.100.189]] 08:38, 20 March 2007 (UTC)


More to the point, "...a function f : X → Y is continuous if the preimage of every open set of Y is open in X" is candidly false!
consider f:R->R, x|->x^2. then the preimage of (-1,1) (an open set in Y) is [0,1) (not an open set in X).
Will delete this phrase.
[[User:HyDeckar|HyDeckar]] 01:13, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:14, 4 July 2007

Sufficient for continuity?

Regarding "...a function f : X → Y is continuous...if the preimage of every closed set of Y is closed in X." at the end of the second paragraph:

Forgive me if I'm mistaken, but in general, preimages of closed sets being closed does not ensure continuity. E.g. for f: [0,1] -> (0,1] where f(x) = x (for x != 0) and f(0) = 1/2, f is not continuous. Perhaps something is assumed that I missed? 203.150.100.189 08:38, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]