Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emmanuel George Cefai: Difference between revisions
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
3. The series of articles in question is clearly a very important academic contribution made by a Maltese scholar: and it would be unjust and discriminatory to exclude Dr. Cefai when so many other Maltese people are included. |
3. The series of articles in question is clearly a very important academic contribution made by a Maltese scholar: and it would be unjust and discriminatory to exclude Dr. Cefai when so many other Maltese people are included. |
||
More over should it be necessary to edit or change or remove any part or parts of this article this would be done reasonably ( communicating with the undersigned) without removing or deleting the article on Emmanuel George Cefai. |
More over should it be necessary to edit or change or remove any part or parts of this article this would be done reasonably ( communicating with the undersigned) without removing or deleting the article on Emmanuel George Cefai. 16th July 2007 |
||
Revision as of 17:53, 16 July 2007
- Emmanuel George Cefai (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Apparent self-promotion of a person generally unknown. Drieakko 14:47, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
- Please do not delete before considering.
I object to the proposed deletion of the article on Emmanuel george Cefai because
1. all data and contents in it are easily verifiable and exist in public records (in this case mostly the news paper daily news of Malta)
2. Emmanuel george Cefai clearly merits this reference. : to delete this article would be to deprive other wikipedians from knowing fully about this important series of articles published by Dr. Cefai and the resume’ and critique of which forms basically the contents of the article.
3. The series of articles in question is clearly a very important academic contribution made by a Maltese scholar: and it would be unjust and discriminatory to exclude Dr. Cefai when so many other Maltese people are included.
More over should it be necessary to edit or change or remove any part or parts of this article this would be done reasonably ( communicating with the undersigned) without removing or deleting the article on Emmanuel George Cefai. 16th July 2007
- Delete. Cannot find any evidence of publications about this person; it seems all that exists are publications by him. And not enough of those to justify this article, either. May also want to consider the following additional articles:
- all of which relate to work performed by this writer. JulesH 15:07, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete- not notable and has only been the work of 1 author/ IP address WP:CSD#A7 ChrisLamb 15:12, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. I can't find any reliable sources on the man in question. Might be willing to reconsider if someone else were able to do so and thus demonstrate notability. -Hit bull, win steak(Moo!) 15:20, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete all per nom; no apparent references about the guy, just by him. These articles are weird. Propaniac 16:04, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete all for any page that only has Emmanuel George Cefai's information and is not notable on its own. NobutoraTakeda 16:09, 16 July 2007 (UTC)