Jump to content

Talk:Juan Luis Cipriani Thorne: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Solved that
m moved Talk:Juan Luis Cardinal Cipriani Thorne to Talk:Juan Luis Cipriani Thorne: His name is Juan Luis Cipriani Thorne, "Cardinal" is not part of the name
(No difference)

Revision as of 20:41, 18 July 2007

WikiProject iconBiography Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Statement on human rights

This article has two totally contradictory paragraphs on his famous statement on human rights. The first reads

Cipriani Thorne is infamous in Peru for once saying "Los derechos humanos son una cojudez" ("human rights are bollocks"), by which he meant some secular and, in his view, radical understandings of human rights. Like the broader Catholic Church, Cipriani Thorne is acutely aware of some of the potential or actual incompatibilities between some contemporary understandings of human rights and the Christian worldview.

The second says

Cardinal Cipriani never said "Human Rights are bollocks". What he said was "La Coordinadora De Derechos Humanos es una cojudez", or "Human Rights Coordinator is a bollock". Coordinadora De Derechos Humanos (Human Rights Coordinator) is a NGO which is in fact an organization composed of people with leftist tendencies.

Either he said "los derechos humanos son una cojudez" or he didn't. It can't be both ways. I notice that Mario Vargas Llosa says he did say it in Caretas. Does anyone know if Llosa was correct? --Descendall 18:47, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

While I know this'll seem extremely lame, I've removed all of that since NONE of it was cited. 68.39.174.238 03:28, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]