User talk:Typing monkey: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 01:49, 21 July 2007

Welcome

Hello, Typing monkey, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --D -Day ^{What up? Am I cool, or what?} 21:23, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You are indeed cool. Thanks for the welcome! Typing monkey 09:48, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

user_talk:typing.monkey/archive

Careful

[1] This edit was totally unacceptable and I regard it to have been a serious violation of our policies on biographies of living people and rightly reverted. I'm far from convinced that the admission in one interview is enough for inclusion of the material when it has been so categoricially denied elsewhere and certainly does not qualify to be included in the heading. Adding the word "prostitution" to the heading (which then shows up in the contents at the top of the page) consitutes excessive undue weight to that element of the subject's life (which is far from conclusively established). Failure to abide by our policies on biographies of living people will result in your being blocked from editing. The interview may need to be included in the article in some manner, but the form should be agreed on the talkpage before edits are made. WjBscribe 19:11, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Responded in further detail on your talk page. Your threat is out of line and abusive. It is not vandalism to link to a recorded interview that was broadcast nationally, it is a verifiable source, is not libelous and is not in violation of the biography guidelines. Some people are controversial but this does not mean they should be immune from past statements. Wikipedia is not a PR mechanism.Typing monkey 01:19, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Don't be imitidate by WJBscribe. He is using his authority in a totally inappropriate manner. It is shocking to see this happen. Is there a mechanism at Wikipedia to oversee misconduct by administrators? I hope there is, because it should be activated immediately. 24.18.130.89 01:49, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 18: / Line 18: @@
 [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Matt_Sanchez&diff=prev&oldid=145967238] This edit was totally unacceptable and I regard it to have been a serious violation of our policies on [[WP:BLP|biographies of living people]] and rightly reverted. I'm far from convinced that the admission in one interview is enough for inclusion of the material when it has been so categoricially denied elsewhere and certainly does not qualify to be included in the heading. Adding the word "prostitution" to the heading (which then shows up in the contents at the top of the page) consitutes excessive undue weight to that element of the subject's life (which is far from conclusively established). Failure to abide by our policies on biographies of living people will result in your being blocked from editing. The interview may need to be included in the article in some manner, but the form should be agreed on the talkpage before edits are made. <span style="font-family: Verdana">[[User:WJBscribe|'''WjB''']][[User talk:WJBscribe|scribe]]</span> 19:11, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
 :Responded in further detail on your talk page.  Your threat is out of line and abusive.  It is not vandalism to link to a recorded interview that was broadcast nationally, it is a verifiable source, is not libelous and is not in violation of the biography guidelines.  Some people are controversial but this does not mean they should be immune from past statements.  Wikipedia is not a PR mechanism.[[User:Typing monkey|Typing monkey]] 01:19, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
+: Don't be imitidate by WJBscribe. He is using his authority in a totally inappropriate manner. It is shocking to see this happen. Is there a mechanism at Wikipedia to oversee misconduct by administrators? I hope there is, because it should be activated immediately. [[User:24.18.130.89|24.18.130.89]] 01:49, 21 July 2007 (UTC)