Jump to content

User talk:Mais oui!: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m rv PA
No edit summary
Line 51: Line 51:
==Private Investigations==
==Private Investigations==
Hi - inspired by recent awesome activity (more than 2 active users!) on the Scottish island front, I have taken a brief break from editing to create the draft of a WikiProject to cover this. The number of editors is small, but the scope is large and I think it might be useful to have a bit more focus to help potential new editors get involved. There is a draft of the project page [[User:Ben_MacDui/Sandbox2|here]] and of the navigation template [[User:Ben_MacDui/Sandbox3|at the top of this page]], (both shamelessly plagiarised from the assumed parent Wikiproject). I notice the glad announcement on your User page re WP:SCO that the "consultation period was successful". However I can't see anything in the gudielines that requires this. Nonetheless, I'd like to be polite. Should it be raised at WP:SCO for example, or can it just be announced? It would ideally have a shortcut e.g. WP:ISLE, and I'm assuming that can just be created without further ado too. Any advice gratefully received. [[User:Ben MacDui|Ben MacDui]] <small>[[User talk:Ben MacDui|(Talk)]]</small> 09:02, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
Hi - inspired by recent awesome activity (more than 2 active users!) on the Scottish island front, I have taken a brief break from editing to create the draft of a WikiProject to cover this. The number of editors is small, but the scope is large and I think it might be useful to have a bit more focus to help potential new editors get involved. There is a draft of the project page [[User:Ben_MacDui/Sandbox2|here]] and of the navigation template [[User:Ben_MacDui/Sandbox3|at the top of this page]], (both shamelessly plagiarised from the assumed parent Wikiproject). I notice the glad announcement on your User page re WP:SCO that the "consultation period was successful". However I can't see anything in the gudielines that requires this. Nonetheless, I'd like to be polite. Should it be raised at WP:SCO for example, or can it just be announced? It would ideally have a shortcut e.g. WP:ISLE, and I'm assuming that can just be created without further ado too. Any advice gratefully received. [[User:Ben MacDui|Ben MacDui]] <small>[[User talk:Ben MacDui|(Talk)]]</small> 09:02, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

== Royal Scottish Geographical Society ==
Plse explain why you are reverting my edits to this entry? Plse explain your credibility and expertise in this area? [[User: 83.67.68.118 (Talk) ]]

Revision as of 12:45, 23 July 2007

Archive
Archives



  1. Archive 1
  2. Archive 2
  3. Archive 3
  4. Archive 4
  5. Archive 5
  6. Archive 6
  7. Archive 7
  8. Archive 8
  9. Archive 9
  10. Archive 10
  11. Archive 11
  12. Archive 12
  13. Archive 13
  14. Archive 14
  15. Archive 15
  16. Archive 16


Problems over the image to be used - this seems to be "festering" into an ongoing debate. I think it is quite clear in the WP:FAIRUSE policy that we cannot use the Royal Standard, the Coat of Arms or indeed anything else which specifically is the property of the Crown in a Template - it may be used on the relevant page. Thanks for your support on this one, hopefully it can be resolved to people's satisfaction. Davidkinnen 08:08, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-confessional

A "{{prod}}" template has been added to the article Non-confessional, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Lilac Soul 20:41, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gordon S Brown

Hi,

You have just reverted my Gordon Brown disambiguation entry, before I'd even posted the article about this person! As well as having been on Horsham council for some years, he has published several books on railways and railway preservation and, i believe other subjects besides. What were your grounds for deciding he is a non-notable person? Thank you. regards, Lynbarn 09:34, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Andy Murray

I'm not in an edit war. I moved GB above Scotland twice, which it should be, and other people have removed references etc. You anyway seem to have caused it, I move GB to the top and a perfectly good reason is given on the talk page and you moved it back citing no edit summary as the reason. Common sense should surely be used here, ad your edit was needless. And please don't move Scotland back to the top or it will be you getting edit waring, as this has been discussed on the talk page and as nobody has given me a good reason why GB should be under Scotland. So if you keep moving it back without reason surley it is you who should be warned. JimmyMac82 09:11, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Brian Souter

It's like talking to a spin doctor. I could use some help reasoning, and I may RfC as ludicrous as it seems that I'd need to for such a blatantly POV article. - superβεεcat  17:34, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Private Investigations

Hi - inspired by recent awesome activity (more than 2 active users!) on the Scottish island front, I have taken a brief break from editing to create the draft of a WikiProject to cover this. The number of editors is small, but the scope is large and I think it might be useful to have a bit more focus to help potential new editors get involved. There is a draft of the project page here and of the navigation template at the top of this page, (both shamelessly plagiarised from the assumed parent Wikiproject). I notice the glad announcement on your User page re WP:SCO that the "consultation period was successful". However I can't see anything in the gudielines that requires this. Nonetheless, I'd like to be polite. Should it be raised at WP:SCO for example, or can it just be announced? It would ideally have a shortcut e.g. WP:ISLE, and I'm assuming that can just be created without further ado too. Any advice gratefully received. Ben MacDui (Talk) 09:02, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Royal Scottish Geographical Society

Plse explain why you are reverting my edits to this entry? Plse explain your credibility and expertise in this area? User: 83.67.68.118 (Talk)