Jump to content

User:Kai/talk: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Kai (talk | contribs)
Kai (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{User:MiszaBot/config
|maxarchivesize = 100K
|counter = 1
|algo = old(15d)
|archive = User talk:Kai/Archive %(counter)d
}}

{{archive box|auto=yes}}
{{archive box|auto=yes}}



Revision as of 07:16, 26 July 2007

Your VandalProof Application

Dear Kai,

Thank you for applying for VandalProof! (VP). As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact the just released 1.3 version has even more power. Because of this we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. The reason for this is that at this time you do not meet the minimum requirement of 250 edits to mainspace articles (see under main here). Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again soon. Thank you for your interest in VandalProof.

I mean you no disrespect, but I don't understand your comment. I wouldn't consider myself to be assuming ownership on that article. ––Ksy92003(talk) 07:31, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

I was simply advising you to WP:OWN as you are a solid contributor to that article, just a reminder. I admit, I probably should not of used a notice template. -- Kai talk 09:09, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Your recent report to WP:AIV

Thank you for making a report about Sulake (talk · contribs · block log) at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, administrators generally only block users if they have received a recent final warning (one that mentions that the user may be blocked) and they have recently vandalized after that warning was given. The reported user has not yet been blocked because it appears this has not occurred yet. If this user continues to vandalize after their final warning, please report them to the AIV noticeboard again. In this case the editor had not been given a final warning, nor have they made any contributions since the 4th July. Regards Khukri 15:03, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Why is this a redirect from an "implausible typo"? SalaSkan 13:20, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

I was lazy, using TW, it seemed best fitting for a page that had a soft redirect to a Wiktionary article -- Kai talk 06:16, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to VandalProof!

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Kai! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. 22:31, 24 July 2007 (UTC)