User talk:Green108

Sockpuppetry case

Block Request

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to [[Template:Highssp]] for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page.Template:Do not delete IPSOS (talk) 19:45, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Green108 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I need to respond to an accusation of sockpuppetry, see below . There is no evidence to connect me to any other individual. I would like to see what the previous judgements were made on. I edit mainly on one small area of speciality of which I have personal experience BKWSU and have done considerable research. If you look at my edits, the vast majority over the last year have been firstly supplying academics references and then secondly grunt work cleaning them up into template form.

I am being attacked by two members of the organisation Core Internet PR Team, the leader of which has stated outrightly that he is attempting to have me banned. See, below. Although I do not have the time to identify this right now, I think you will see that they share a pattern of editing, reversion and personal attacks against me and that a disproportionate amount of effort has been putting into gaming the wiki against me.

I feel bad that others editors are being brought into this. It is a narrow subject, views will be polarised and any unofficial editor will face the "official" PR Team. I am slightly disadvantaged as I do not have the time to invest in all the wiki-lawyering and have focused mainly on production and maintenance.

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I need to respond to an accusation of sockpuppetry, see below . There is no evidence to connect me to any other individual. I would like to see what the previous judgements were made on. I edit mainly on one small area of speciality of which I have personal experience [[BKWSU]] and have done considerable research. If you look at my edits, the vast majority over the last year have been firstly supplying academics references and then secondly grunt work cleaning them up into template form. I am being attacked by two members of the organisation Core Internet PR Team, the leader of which has stated outrightly that he is attempting to have me banned. See, below. Although I do not have the time to identify this right now, I think you will see that they share a pattern of editing, reversion and personal attacks against me and that a disproportionate amount of effort has been putting into gaming the wiki against me. I feel bad that others editors are being brought into this. It is a narrow subject, views will be polarised and any unofficial editor will face the "official" PR Team. I am slightly disadvantaged as I do not have the time to invest in all the wiki-lawyering and have focused mainly on production and maintenance. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I need to respond to an accusation of sockpuppetry, see below . There is no evidence to connect me to any other individual. I would like to see what the previous judgements were made on. I edit mainly on one small area of speciality of which I have personal experience [[BKWSU]] and have done considerable research. If you look at my edits, the vast majority over the last year have been firstly supplying academics references and then secondly grunt work cleaning them up into template form. I am being attacked by two members of the organisation Core Internet PR Team, the leader of which has stated outrightly that he is attempting to have me banned. See, below. Although I do not have the time to identify this right now, I think you will see that they share a pattern of editing, reversion and personal attacks against me and that a disproportionate amount of effort has been putting into gaming the wiki against me. I feel bad that others editors are being brought into this. It is a narrow subject, views will be polarised and any unofficial editor will face the "official" PR Team. I am slightly disadvantaged as I do not have the time to invest in all the wiki-lawyering and have focused mainly on production and maintenance. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I need to respond to an accusation of sockpuppetry, see below . There is no evidence to connect me to any other individual. I would like to see what the previous judgements were made on. I edit mainly on one small area of speciality of which I have personal experience [[BKWSU]] and have done considerable research. If you look at my edits, the vast majority over the last year have been firstly supplying academics references and then secondly grunt work cleaning them up into template form. I am being attacked by two members of the organisation Core Internet PR Team, the leader of which has stated outrightly that he is attempting to have me banned. See, below. Although I do not have the time to identify this right now, I think you will see that they share a pattern of editing, reversion and personal attacks against me and that a disproportionate amount of effort has been putting into gaming the wiki against me. I feel bad that others editors are being brought into this. It is a narrow subject, views will be polarised and any unofficial editor will face the "official" PR Team. I am slightly disadvantaged as I do not have the time to invest in all the wiki-lawyering and have focused mainly on production and maintenance. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Sock puppet case; [1]

Deliberate attempt to ban; [2]

The two users are Bksimonb (talk · contribs) and Riveros11 (talk · contribs).