Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2007 August 5: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Ashadeofgrey (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
|||
| Line 286: | Line 286: | ||
*As the default image in the toolbar has been changed to [[:Example.png]], I see no reason to keep this image. <sub>→[[User:AzaToth|<span style="color:#773">Aza</span>]][[User_talk:AzaToth|<span style="color:#359">Toth</span>]]</sub> 18:37, 5 August 2007 (UTC) |
*As the default image in the toolbar has been changed to [[:Example.png]], I see no reason to keep this image. <sub>→[[User:AzaToth|<span style="color:#773">Aza</span>]][[User_talk:AzaToth|<span style="color:#359">Toth</span>]]</sub> 18:37, 5 August 2007 (UTC) |
||
*Not that it matters, but I'm not the uploader of the current image (much better than the one I had uploaded). I don't see much of a point of deleting the image, it's helpful to have a such sample image. <br> BTW the gallery button still uses "Image:Example.jpg|Caption1" for samples. -- User:Docu |
*Not that it matters, but I'm not the uploader of the current image (much better than the one I had uploaded). I don't see much of a point of deleting the image, it's helpful to have a such sample image. <br> BTW the gallery button still uses "Image:Example.jpg|Caption1" for samples. -- User:Docu |
||
====[[:Image:Encephalon.png]]==== |
|||
:<span class="plainlinksneverexpand lx">[[:Image:{{ucfirst:Encephalon.png}}]] ([{{fullurl:Image:Encephalon.png|action=delete}} delete] | [[Image talk:{{ucfirst:Encephalon.png}}|talk]] | [{{fullurl::Image:{{ucfirst:Encephalon.png}}|action=history}} history] | [{{fullurl:Special:Log|page={{urlencode::Image:{{ucfirst:Encephalon.png}}}}}} logs])</span> - uploaded by [[User talk:Nrets#Image:Encephalon.png listed for deletion|Nrets]] (<span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:User_talk:Nrets|action=edit&preload=Template:idw_preload&editintro=Template:idw_editintro§ion=new&create=Post+a+comment}} notify]</span> | [[Special:Contributions/Nrets|contribs]]). |
|||
*Obsolete [[:Image:EmbryonicBrain.png]] |
|||
![→[[:Image:Example.jpg]]](#Image:Example.jpg){kind=link}
Revision as of 19:21, 5 August 2007
August 5
- Delete per WP:NFCC#8, does not increase readers' understanding in a way words cannot. Videmus Omnia Talk 00:05, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep, as a section of the article of the single is devoted to the style and substance of the video itself. An image of a video enhances the section. Tarc 05:03, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:NFCC#8, does not increase readers' understanding in a way words cannot. Videmus Omnia Talk 00:31, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep, as a section of the article of the single is devoted to the style and substance of the video itself. An image of a video enhances the section. Max24 011:13, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete One sentence is not a section. 17Drew 10:23, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Videmus Omnia Talk 00:47, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
Delete per WP:NFCC#8, decorative image that does not increase readers; understanding in a way words cannot. Videmus Omnia Talk 01:38, 5 August 2007 (UTC)- Keep. Quickly shows the reader the concept of girl on left, boy on right, split screen story telling that is both an unusual device and central to the theme of the video. An excellent illustration of the video. Perhaps only aided by the addition of a second still frame showing the completed heart. --Knulclunk 01:43, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- [edit conflict] How's that? It illustrates the video's use of splitscreen as well and the two characters discussed in the section about the music video. 17Drew 01:44, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- Comment - a non-free image is needed to demonstrate the concept of split screen? Wouldn't words do this just as well? Videmus Omnia Talk 02:06, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- Why should I as a reader, have to look up the film device splitscreen? The effectiveness of the device at displaying both separate and together relationships over time is conveyed much better with an illustration than with words. But, if the splitscreen is not used for the majority of the plot portions of the video, I will concede. --Knulclunk 02:12, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- Splitscreen and parallelism are the two techniques used to show the lives of the two characters. Since illustrating the parallelism would require two different screenshots to be used, using one of the splitscreen requires the least copyrighted material to be used. Plus, the screenshot identifies the two characters being discussed in the section. 17Drew 02:23, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- Ah, now I see. (Plus I downloaded the video and checked it out.) Withdrawing nom, thanks. Videmus Omnia Talk 02:29, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- Splitscreen and parallelism are the two techniques used to show the lives of the two characters. Since illustrating the parallelism would require two different screenshots to be used, using one of the splitscreen requires the least copyrighted material to be used. Plus, the screenshot identifies the two characters being discussed in the section. 17Drew 02:23, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Moochocoogle (notify | contribs).
- Delete per WP:NFCC#8, does not increase readers' understanding in a way words cannot. Videmus Omnia Talk 02:49, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- Unused, unencyclopedic, apparent vanity. The photograph depicts some high school students who won something. — Postdlf 03:39, 5 August 2007 (UTC).
- - uploaded by Lizard King (notify | contribs).
- GFDL presumed, Orphaned MER-C 05:59, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Patrick MMA Bringmans (notify | contribs).
- GFDL presumed, Orphaned MER-C 06:02, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Diegofrieden (notify | contribs).
- GFDL presumed, Orphaned MER-C 06:04, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by MisterHand (notify | contribs).
- Publicity image of living person replaceable with free use image — Ejfetters 06:47, 5 August 2007 (UTC).
- Promotional fair use image for living person replaceable with free use image — Ejfetters 06:52, 5 August 2007 (UTC).
- - uploaded by Pegasus1138 (notify | contribs).
- Promotional fair use image for living person, replaceable with free use image — Ejfetters 06:57, 5 August 2007 (UTC).
- - uploaded by Crypticfirefly (notify | contribs).
- Promotional fair use image for living person, replaceable with free use image — Ejfetters 07:01, 5 August 2007 (UTC).
- Copyright tag says its usable for any purpose, but no proof has been given. Image is a fair use promo photo replaceable with a free use one — Ejfetters 07:07, 5 August 2007 (UTC).
- Did not realize this was already a nom for deletion before, sorry. Ejfetters 07:13, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- This was resolved on Images and media for deletion/2007 July 13. Many thanks. JungleCat Shiny!/Oohhh! 17:12, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- Fair use image of living person, replaceable with a free use one — Ejfetters 07:13, 5 August 2007 (UTC).
- - uploaded by Minesweeper (notify | contribs).
- A vector version of this image is also available OsamaK 08:52, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- A vector version of this image is also available OsamaK 12:27, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Space Cadet (notify | contribs).
- Unencyclopedic, orphaned image unusable in Wiki main space M0RD00R 12:27, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Space Cadet (notify | contribs).
- Unencyclopedic, orphaned, inflammatory image unusable in Wiki main space M0RD00R 12:18, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Space Cadet (notify | contribs).
- Unencyclopedic, orphaned image unusable in Wiki main space M0RD00R 12:13, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Space Cadet (notify | contribs).
- Unencyclopedic, orphaned image unusable in Wiki main spaceM0RD00R 12:10, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Space Cadet (notify | contribs).
- Unencyclopedic, orphaned image unusable in Wiki main space M0RD00R 12:07, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Space cadet (notify | contribs).
- Unencyclopedic, orphaned image unusable in Wiki main spaceM0RD00R 12:03, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Space Cadet (notify | contribs).
- Unencyclopedic orphaned image unusable in Wiki main space M0RD00R 12:01, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by User:Space Cadet (notify | contribs).
- Unencyclopedic, low quality, orphaned image never to be used in Wiki main space M0RD00R 11:57, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by AshumsTheMoose (notify | contribs).
- Claims to fall under fair use but has no fair use rationale, insufficient source information, uploader has been inactive since March 2007. — -- SilentAria talk 12:40, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- Claims to fall under fair use but has no fair use rationale. — -- SilentAria talk 12:40, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- Claims to fall under fair use but has no fair use rationale, insufficient source information. — -- SilentAria talk 12:40, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- Claims to fall under fair use but has no fair use rationale, insufficient source information. — -- SilentAria talk 12:40, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Space Cadet (notify | contribs).
- Unencyclopedic, orphaned image never to be used in Wiki main space M0RD00R 12:50, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- it's like Image:Wappen Buchloe.png and it's jpg OsamaK 14:12, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Ahoerstemeier (notify | contribs).
- A vector version of this image is also available OsamaK 14:16, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by SergeyLitvinov (notify | contribs).
- it's not seem (bit bit) Image:TikhvinGerb.png, but it like it.Image:TikhvinGerb.png is enough, OsamaK 14:20, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Ahoerstemeier (notify | contribs).
- - uploaded by Ahoerstemeier (notify | contribs).
- No source, image:Wappen Landkreis Torgau-Oschatz.png is better OsamaK 14:23, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Ahoerstemeier (notify | contribs).
- No source, Image:Wappen Landkreis Parchim.png like it (from commons) OsamaK 14:25, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Ahoerstemeier (notify | contribs).
- No source and Image:Wappen Landkreis Nordwestmecklenburg.png is better and bigger. OsamaK 14:27, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Ahoerstemeier (notify | contribs).
- No source and Image:Wappen Ohrekreis.png is bigger. OsamaK 14:28, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Ahoerstemeier (notify | contribs).
- No source and Image:Wappen Muldentalkreis.svg is bigger and it's SVG. OsamaK 14:29, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Ahoerstemeier (notify | contribs).
- No source and Image:Wappen Main-Tauber-Kreis.png is bigger. OsamaK 14:31, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Ahoerstemeier (notify | contribs).
- No source and Image:Wappen Landkreis Ludwigslust.png is bigger and better. OsamaK 14:33, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Ahoerstemeier (notify | contribs).
- No source and Image:Kreiswappen des Kreises Lippe.png is bigger and better. OsamaK 14:34, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- No source and Image:Wappen Cölbe.svg is bigger and better. OsamaK 14:36, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Ahoerstemeier (notify | contribs).
- No source and Image:Kreis Borken coa.svg is bigger and better. OsamaK 14:38, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- No source and Image:Wappen Landkreis Aschersleben-Stassfurt.png is bigger and better. OsamaK 14:42, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- No source and Image:Wappen-Mainz.svg is bigger and better. OsamaK 14:46, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Juliya2000 (notify | contribs).
.png){kind=link}
- Image:Aumred.png superseded by SVG version Image:Aum red.svg — DoSiDo 14:49, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep The PNG version is currently placed/linked on over 200 articles, user pages, and user talk pages. What really needs to happen is for someone to replace it on article pages with the SVG version, which I fully support, but can't do. Then what about the user and talk pages that will have a broken image link? Is there a policy on that? Are we now removing all PNG files that have an SVG version? As the uploader/creator of the PNG version, I'm not attached to it staying or being deleted. Someone just needs to make sure that all the pages that currently have the image are taken care of. ॐ Priyanath talk 15:10, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- Impressive, but unnesary non-free image showing three million people protesting in the streets, used to illustrate the information that three million people protested in the streets. It doesn't help on the articles comprehension in a way that words alone can not. Abu badali (talk) 15:14, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Stalmannen (notify | contribs).
- Non-free image showing a dead man used (in 4 artciles) to illustrate information about his assassination and about the concept of assassination. Unnecessary for the article's comprehension (and replaceable in some articles). Abu badali (talk) 15:18, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- Unnecessary non-free image showing a politician taking her oath as President. It doesn't add any noteworthy information that isn't already conveyed with text. Abu badali (talk) 15:20, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- No evidence that this was released as a promotional photo. Delete per WP:NFCC#2 and WP:NFCC#3, replaceable by screenshot for encyclopedic purposes. Videmus Omnia Talk 15:52, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- No evidence that this was released as a promotional photo. Delete per WP:NFCC#2 and WP:NFCC#3, replaceable by screenshot for encyclopedic purposes. Videmus Omnia Talk 16:03, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Willy turner (notify | contribs).
- Delete per WP:NFCC#10a, unknown copyright holder. Videmus Omnia Talk 16:04, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- No evidence that this was released as a promotional photo. Delete per WP:NFCC#2 and WP:NFCC#3, replaceable by screenshot for encyclopedic purposes. Videmus Omnia Talk 16:05, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by SoxrockProjects (notify | contribs).
- CV - Labeled as GFDL but it's an image from the New York Times so that is not possible here. — cholmes75 (chit chat) 16:22, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by ScoobyDoo01 (notify | contribs).
- Delete per WP:NFCC#8, does not increase readers' understanding in a way words cannot. Videmus Omnia Talk 16:44, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- Nonfree image showing a team holding a trophy, I don't see how this significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic. Abu badali (talk) 16:45, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This nomination concerns WP:NFCC#8, so, please let's avoid unrelated keep votes.
- "The image depicts a unrepeatable event"
- Yes, but still we don't need to show an image to discuss this unrepeatable event.
- "The event was very very important for the team in question because [insert your reason here]."
- I'm not saying the event shouldn't be discussed in the article. I'm saying the discussion can be understood without an image.
- "One image is worth a thousand words"
- Per NFCC#8, we prefer a thousand freely licensed words to one non-free image. And, lucky enough, the noteworthy encyclopedic information contained in this image can be conveyed with far less than a thousand words.
- "NFCC#8 is bogus, as any image can be replaced by text."
- No. Some subjects are difficult or impossible to be adequately discussed in a educational context without the help of imagery. The event depicted on this image is not one for those cases.
- "This is copyright paranoia"
- This has nothing to do with either or not this image's use is legal. It's about either this image can be replaced by text that serves a similar function.
- "The nominator has an RFC and Arb case against him, he's a stalker"
- Per WP:NPA, comment on content, not on the contributor.
- "The image depicts a unrepeatable event"
Thanks, --Abu badali (talk) 16:53, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- No source, Image:Wappen Landkreis Augsburg.png is better and bigger OsamaK 17:10, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- superseded by Image:Wappen Breitscheid (Hessen).png better and bigger. OsamaK 17:19, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- As the default image in the toolbar has been changed to Example.png, I see no reason to keep this image. →AzaToth 18:37, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- Not that it matters, but I'm not the uploader of the current image (much better than the one I had uploaded). I don't see much of a point of deleting the image, it's helpful to have a such sample image.
BTW the gallery button still uses "Image:Example.jpg|Caption1" for samples. -- User:Docu
- Obsolete Image:EmbryonicBrain.png
