Jump to content

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:UBeR/interesting edits: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
ps
Line 3: Line 3:
*It's more like a collection of edits made by others. ~ [[User:UBeR|UBeR]]
*It's more like a collection of edits made by others. ~ [[User:UBeR|UBeR]]
:While I still think that UBeR should in good taste blank the page and move on, seeing as it's Raul who's trying to delete it and by extension prolly has a vested interest, I'll abstain from this. <font color="#cc6600">[[User:David Fuchs|David Fuchs]]</font><sup> <nowiki>(</nowiki><small><font color="#993300">[[User talk:David Fuchs|talk]]</font></small><nowiki>)</nowiki></sup> 20:22, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
:While I still think that UBeR should in good taste blank the page and move on, seeing as it's Raul who's trying to delete it and by extension prolly has a vested interest, I'll abstain from this. <font color="#cc6600">[[User:David Fuchs|David Fuchs]]</font><sup> <nowiki>(</nowiki><small><font color="#993300">[[User talk:David Fuchs|talk]]</font></small><nowiki>)</nowiki></sup> 20:22, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
::In addition, UBeR is quite right that it's mostly just a collection of quotes- although to be entirely neutral, he could just remove the link names. <font color="#cc6600">[[User:David Fuchs|David Fuchs]]</font><sup> <nowiki>(</nowiki><small><font color="#993300">[[User talk:David Fuchs|talk]]</font></small><nowiki>)</nowiki></sup> 20:23, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:23, 16 August 2007

Not just an attack page, but a reincarnation of Uber's three previously deleted "hit list" attack pages - User:UBeR/Administrative watchdog, User:UBeR/WMC, User:UBeR/Raul654. Wik was previously banned for doing this. Raul654 18:35, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • It's more like a collection of edits made by others. ~ UBeR
While I still think that UBeR should in good taste blank the page and move on, seeing as it's Raul who's trying to delete it and by extension prolly has a vested interest, I'll abstain from this. David Fuchs (talk) 20:22, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
In addition, UBeR is quite right that it's mostly just a collection of quotes- although to be entirely neutral, he could just remove the link names. David Fuchs (talk) 20:23, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]