User talk:Neoballmon II

Hi. Welcome to my talk page. I guess I'll get the ball rolling here.

Hi, I'm Rick, and I'm a grape-a-holic. Any time there's a grape around, I can't leave it there. I have to eat it. I could eat grapes for hours if given the chance.

March 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Some of your recent edits, such as those you made to Wirreanda High School, have been considered unhelpful or unconstructive and have been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Wikipedia is not the place to air your grievances about your school, nor is it the place for Original Research. If the statements you made are true, please try and find a newspaper article which states this and reference it. Chris B 12:27, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Notability of Dara Robinson

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Dara Robinson, by Tony Sidaway (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Dara Robinson seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Dara Robinson, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 16:54, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Ranchester, Wyoming

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Ranchester, Wyoming. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Nyttend 13:26, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been indefinitely blocked, because evidence at Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Neoballmon has shown that this account is a sockpuppet or meatpuppet of User:Neoballmon used to circumvent Wikipedia policies. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Neoballmon II (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I think it's unfair to say that I am guilty of sock-puppetting. I have a genuine phobia of sock puppets, and I wouldn't ever go near them. They're just freaky! Socks should never have mouths. And I don't believe this account is technically a sock puppet? Isn't sock puppetting having 2 active accounts to have arguments with yourself and do things discretely. And if someone wanted to sock-puppet, they most likely wouldn't put their new account as (Old Name) II. This is just a repeat of 2005 when I was accused of hacking into computers, when really, it was using passwords that I found in a publically available list. That's just stupidity on the staff's fault.

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I think it's unfair to say that I am guilty of sock-puppetting. I have a genuine phobia of sock puppets, and I wouldn't ever go near them. They're just freaky! Socks should never have mouths. And I don't believe this account is technically a sock puppet? Isn't sock puppetting having 2 active accounts to have arguments with yourself and do things discretely. And if someone wanted to sock-puppet, they most likely wouldn't put their new account as (Old Name) II. This is just a repeat of 2005 when I was accused of hacking into computers, when really, it was using passwords that I found in a publically available list. That's just stupidity on the staff's fault.  |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I think it's unfair to say that I am guilty of sock-puppetting. I have a genuine phobia of sock puppets, and I wouldn't ever go near them. They're just freaky! Socks should never have mouths. And I don't believe this account is technically a sock puppet? Isn't sock puppetting having 2 active accounts to have arguments with yourself and do things discretely. And if someone wanted to sock-puppet, they most likely wouldn't put their new account as (Old Name) II. This is just a repeat of 2005 when I was accused of hacking into computers, when really, it was using passwords that I found in a publically available list. That's just stupidity on the staff's fault.  |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I think it's unfair to say that I am guilty of sock-puppetting. I have a genuine phobia of sock puppets, and I wouldn't ever go near them. They're just freaky! Socks should never have mouths. And I don't believe this account is technically a sock puppet? Isn't sock puppetting having 2 active accounts to have arguments with yourself and do things discretely. And if someone wanted to sock-puppet, they most likely wouldn't put their new account as (Old Name) II. This is just a repeat of 2005 when I was accused of hacking into computers, when really, it was using passwords that I found in a publically available list. That's just stupidity on the staff's fault.  |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}