Jump to content

Talk:Hagakure: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Hidden by the leaves? Shadow of the leaves?: go-go eventuo-inclusionist advice!
m tsuifuku?: possible definition
Line 58: Line 58:


::I've traced the change to this edit- http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Hagakure&diff=next&oldid=116223027, by an anonymous editor. In a "d'oh" moment, I realised I had a bilingual version of Hagakure, with Wilson's translation, to chase this up in. While your excerpt uses "tsuifuku", the same passage in Wilson uses the term "oibara"- onyomi and kunyomi respectively of the kanji 追腹 ("following belly"), and ''oibara'' is the term defined on the [[seppuku]] page. Both usages seem to be popular, so I might add the on'yomi to the seppuku page.--[[User:DrHacky|DrHacky]] 07:04, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
::I've traced the change to this edit- http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Hagakure&diff=next&oldid=116223027, by an anonymous editor. In a "d'oh" moment, I realised I had a bilingual version of Hagakure, with Wilson's translation, to chase this up in. While your excerpt uses "tsuifuku", the same passage in Wilson uses the term "oibara"- onyomi and kunyomi respectively of the kanji 追腹 ("following belly"), and ''oibara'' is the term defined on the [[seppuku]] page. Both usages seem to be popular, so I might add the on'yomi to the seppuku page.--[[User:DrHacky|DrHacky]] 07:04, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

:Kanji: 対幅 and here's a link that describes the word as generally meaning "hanging scrolls" from the Japanese Archetecture and Art Net Users System: </br>http://www.aisf.or.jp/~jaanus/deta/t/tsuifuku.htm -- GeorgeHarnish 5:21 22 August 2007 (UTC)


== Hidden by the leaves? Shadow of the leaves? ==
== Hidden by the leaves? Shadow of the leaves? ==

Revision as of 15:28, 22 August 2007

WikiProject iconJapan Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 22:30, December 29, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Japan to do list:
  • Featured content candidates – 

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

"former samurai"

Former? Samurai was a class, not a position. Even after the death of his lord he was no less samurai than before. --71.139.161.239 02:42, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

He would actually become a ronin. Here is wikipedia's description for Ronin-

A rōnin (浪人, rōnin?) was a masterless samurai during the feudal period (1185–1868) of Japan. A samurai became masterless from the ruin or fall of his master, or after the loss of his master's favor or privilege. Since a rōnin did not serve any lord, he was no longer a samurai, as the noun samurai came from the verb saburau which was the Japanese for "to serve".

He had no master, so he was no longer a samurai. One quick correction, this assumes we are speaking of the Edo period sense of the word Ronin.--

Online version

The only current link doesnt work. Perhaps we could replace it with a link to an online text version of the whole Hagakure.

http://www.bunbun.ne.jp/~sword/Hagakure1.html
This link doesn't work.
I'll second the motion to find a link to an online version of the Hagakure text -- if one exists.
If an online version doesn't exist, perhaps a link to a bookseller that carries this work, such as that Brazilian river/tropical rainforest dot com...?
This page seems to have some of the chapters in some accuracy:

[1]

Pray, who owns the copyright of the Hagakure? Can a book that is more than 100 years old have any valid copyright today? WikiStefan(de)
No, but if the translation is more recent than that, the translation may still be in copyright I'm not sure on the laws regarding the copyright of translations. --Jonathan Drain 15:32, 25 Jan 2005 (UTC)
FYI: A translation is a new work, and is copyrighted accordingly. If the original is still under copyright, the translator would require permission from the copyright holder (referred to as a translation right). If the original is no longer copyrighted, then no permission is required. Either way, the translation is considered a new work and is copyrighted according to the copyright laws at the time the translation is created (unless specifically released into the public domain).
As for providing a link to a bookseller—instead just add the book under references and include the ISBN. For example: ISBN 4-7700-1106-7. A quick look at amazon.com shows there are multiple translations available [2]. --BlankVerse 08:02, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)

New text

"It is unfortunate that this classic of Japanese literature is characterised in the above abstract as having little appeal in post World War II Japan. The book was proscribed by the American Militery Occupation and its publication and distribution was suppressed. Quite different value judgments are expressed and are in print in Japan, published by the Hagakure Society of Saga Han, particularly in the Journals of that Society. Reference should be made to HAGAKURE - SPIRIT OF BUSHIDO, edited by Professor Hideo Koga and Professor Stacey B. Day for the University of Kyushu Press, and published in two volumes in 1993. Volume I is in Japanese. Volume 2 is in English (ISBN -4-87378-359-3-C1012). A further text, published by the University of Kyushu Press in 1994, also offers a different insight into Bushido, the moral code of the Samurai. This book is entitled: THE WISDOM OF HAGAKURE : THE WAY OF THE SAMURAI OF SAGA DOMAIN, by Stacey B. Day and Kiyoshi Inokuchi (ISBN 4-87378-389-5). It cannot be emphasised enough that when one uses a language other than Japanese to convey the ancient Japanese cultural image as written in the original caligraphic texts, great care must be taken not to MISINFORM readers. Professor Day points out, for example, that although the phrase - "THE WAY OF THE SAMURAI IS FOUND IN DEATH" may be best known in the West, a more accurate translation would read "I HAVE FOUND THAT BUSHIDO IS DEATH", words closer to the spiritual and conceptual teaching of the Hagakure."

An anon added this mass of text. It strikes me as a bit POV, but still with some good material. Anyone want to take a shot at merging it in? --Maru (talk) Contribs 23:13, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Symbol on cover of In-Print ed.

I own the current in-print ed. of the latest English translation in America (William Scott Wilson). The book has been a favorite of mine for some time, but the symbol on the front has perplexed me. Take a look at: http://www.amazon.com/Hagakure-Book-Samurai-Yamamoto-Tsunetomo/dp/4770011067/sr=8-1/qid=1162092965/ref=pd_bbs_1/102-6005019-1155344?ie=UTF8&s=books

It appears to be the international biological hazard symbol. This seems like an interesting bit of trivia if anyone knows more. Did the publishers choose this symbol retroactively, or is it a symbol with Japanese significance. Another interesting tidbit would be whether or not the biohazard symbol came from this sign and how. The current WP article] on the biohazard symbol states it was developed by the Dow company, without any inspiration.

Anyone know more and want to help add it to the article? Thelastemperor 03:42, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I realize that this doesn't really help, but I've think I've seen that design before as a Mon (badge). --Gwern (contribs) 05:01, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

tsuifuku?

"Tsunetomo himself was forbidden to perform Tsuifuku, a retainer's ritual suicide..." What is tsuifuku if it's not seppuku? The hyperlink just redirects to the seppuku page, which doesn't explain tsuifuku either. Is this a term used in Hagakure? What is the kanji for it? Is there any reason not to change it to (the better-known) seppuku?--DrHacky 16:53, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

From the Hagakure:
At the time of Lord Nabeshima Naohiro's death, Lord Mitsushige forbade Naohiro 's retainers the practice of tsuifuku. His messenger went to Naohiro's mansion and made the declaration, but those who received this news could in no way agree to it. From their midst Ishimaru Uneme (later called Seizaemon) spoke from the lowest seat, "It is improper for me as a younger person to speak out, but I think that what Lord Katsushige has said is reasonable. As a person who received the master's care when I was young, I had whole- heartedly decided on tsuifuku. But hearing Lord Katsushige's dictum and being convinced of his reasoning, no matter what the others may do, I am giving up the idea of tsuifuku and will serve the master's successor." Hearing this, the others all followed suit.
Your guess is as good as mine. Skomorokh incite 19:13, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I've traced the change to this edit- http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Hagakure&diff=next&oldid=116223027, by an anonymous editor. In a "d'oh" moment, I realised I had a bilingual version of Hagakure, with Wilson's translation, to chase this up in. While your excerpt uses "tsuifuku", the same passage in Wilson uses the term "oibara"- onyomi and kunyomi respectively of the kanji 追腹 ("following belly"), and oibara is the term defined on the seppuku page. Both usages seem to be popular, so I might add the on'yomi to the seppuku page.--DrHacky 07:04, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Kanji: 対幅 and here's a link that describes the word as generally meaning "hanging scrolls" from the Japanese Archetecture and Art Net Users System:
http://www.aisf.or.jp/~jaanus/deta/t/tsuifuku.htm -- GeorgeHarnish 5:21 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Hidden by the leaves? Shadow of the leaves?

Hagakure (Kyūjitai: 葉隱; Shinjitai: 葉隠; meaning In the Shadow of Leaves)

While "In the Shadow of Leaves" is a commonly given translation, it seems more poetic, while the more accurate translation is "Hidden by the leaves" or "Hidden leaves" (as Wilson states in his introduction). Which definition should be preferred for this article?--DrHacky 07:13, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you can source them, stick them all in. Assuming they are all equally well sourced, I would make the most literal one ('Hidden leaves'?) the one given in the nihongo template, and I would stick in the <ref></ref>s the citation for that after perhaps a note giving the other translations. --Gwern (contribs) 01:58 29 July 2007 (GMT)