User talk:WATP: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 944: | Line 944: | ||
:Believe it or not, the user really does have the right to remove warnings from their talk page. I can't find exactly where it says it, but trust me, it does. They should probably archive it, but what they're doing is perfectly fine, so please stop reverting. Ok? [[User:Gscshoyru|Gscshoyru]] 19:15, 28 August 2007 (UTC) |
:Believe it or not, the user really does have the right to remove warnings from their talk page. I can't find exactly where it says it, but trust me, it does. They should probably archive it, but what they're doing is perfectly fine, so please stop reverting. Ok? [[User:Gscshoyru|Gscshoyru]] 19:15, 28 August 2007 (UTC) |
||
Thank you [[User:Gscshoyru|Gscshoyru]] . Unfortunately, i believe this stalker has added me to a watch list of his so i'll need to abandon my identity to create another. |
|||
Revision as of 19:22, 28 August 2007
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 | ||||||||||||||||
|
| 1 | 2 |
Unsigned abuse, volume 47238
So ban me you boring fucker. Can i help it if i'm bored?
Get a grip. WATP, ffs! Says a lot about you you sad cunt
Besides which, you say vandalize. I say speaking the truth. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.107.241.180 (talk • contribs)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 21:40, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
Rangers.png
Hello, you had asked me why the image removed was deleted when a fair use rationale was provided. The fair use rationale has to be not only provided, but also valid. Here are the factors that determine fair use (from the relevant wiki page:)
1. the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; 2. the nature of the copyrighted work; 3. the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and 4. the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.
Use of the entire logo definitely fails the third prong of the test. Fair use is usually reserved for use of a small portion of a copyrighted work. It evolved in order to allow book reviewers to quote small passages of books. It would almost never be fair use to reproduce, without the copyright holder's consent, the entire copyrighted work. Thanks. Larry Dunn 20:48, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for May 21st, 2007.
 |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 21 | 21 May 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:49, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
Bizarre
You've just been party to the strangest occurrence I've had on Wikipedia. I was doing exactly the same edit to the Rangers F.C. internationalists page (converting the nations into sections).
That aside, I think we should introduce one of these in place of the current table of contents. - Dudesleeper · Talk 18:41, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- Great minds and that. Which one would be most suitable for the article do you think? WATP (talk) • (contribs) 18:50, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- I'm quite partial to the US states one, obviously changing to nations instead. - Dudesleeper · Talk 19:25, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- I agree, looks good. At risk of making a mess of it, I'll leave you to do the honours of inserting it. ;) WATP (talk) • (contribs) 19:29, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- Touché. I'm actually off out, but if you haven't built up the courage upon my return, I'll gladly balls it up instead. - Dudesleeper · Talk 19:31, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- Actually, not going yet, but I can't be arsed doing that yet. A couple of other things on my to-do list need attention first. - Dudesleeper · Talk 19:41, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- Made a start on my sandbox, still needing refined though. WATP (talk) • (contribs) 19:45, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- Done, and added. I have no idea if it should be made into a template or anything, but it's there and it works/seems to work. WATP (talk) • (contribs) 19:52, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- Touché. I'm actually off out, but if you haven't built up the courage upon my return, I'll gladly balls it up instead. - Dudesleeper · Talk 19:31, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- I agree, looks good. At risk of making a mess of it, I'll leave you to do the honours of inserting it. ;) WATP (talk) • (contribs) 19:29, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- I'm quite partial to the US states one, obviously changing to nations instead. - Dudesleeper · Talk 19:25, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for May 28th, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 22 | 28 May 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:01, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
Alternative music WikiProject newsletter
 Issue 2 - May 2007 | |
|
Burnedthru, TommyStardust, Grovermj, KamrynMatika, Merzbow and Cbing01 all joined the alternative music fold during May.
|
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. | |
Delivered by CloudNine 14:46, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
Non-free use disputed for Image:East Timor FA.gif
|
This file may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading Image:East Timor FA.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:47, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for June 4th, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 23 | 4 June 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:17, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Someone To Drive You Home.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Someone To Drive You Home.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:59, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Why did you RMV the protection template
Hi, i would like to know why did you removed the Template in the Dominican Republic of Demi-protection....Please add it again to avoid consistent IP editing!69.120.72.147 17:42, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
User:AlexNewArtBot/ScotlandSearchResult
Thanks for all the updates to the New Articles page you've been doing. I was mid-update myself to the last set of results, when you beat me to updating the page. It was good to see that your prunings matched mine. It's often difficult to prune out the "was born or made in Scotland, or had a dog who lived there" entries from the real ones :-) Anyway, keep up the good work. Cheers. --Cactus.man ✍ 18:55, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
- Yep, it's a problem with the regexp parameters. I'm no expert myself which is why I asked for some regexp gurus in my original postings. There's also
/\[\[\s*Category:[^\]\|]*Scot/ , /Nova\sScotia/ -3 /\WCanad(a|ian)/ -3 /\WUSA\W/ -3 /America/ -3 /Australia/
- You've probably noticed a few Canadian / American / Australian politician and other type entries appearing. This can all be fine tuned, but I'm not the guy to do it. Oh well, heading off to find a copy of Regexp for Dummies for better understanding. -- Cactus.man ✍ 19:17, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
Football club names has been selected as the new collaboration. Please do help in working to improve it.
Signpost updated for June 11th, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 24 | 11 June 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 03:21, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
The Bhoys from Seville - Lisbons Lions
Stop being such a bitter bluenose - there are suchs for it at the end of paragraph.--Vintagekits 16:40, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
- Replied here.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/3RR#User:SqueakBox_reported_by_User:Vintagekits_.28Result:Warned_both.29 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Vintagekits#Wikipedia:Administrators.27_noticeboard.2F3RR
- Gentlemen, you are both above this sort of pettiness. WATP, if you are seriously suggesting Vintagekits is engaging in meatpuppetry or sockpuppetry, you should just say so and/or request a checkuser. Vintagekits, calling someone a "bitter bluenose" isn't really constructive. Everyone has had their say on the AfD, let just wait and see what the closing admin thinks, eh? Rockpocket 17:49, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
- Cool - I am not just going to sit back and let this - slag me off.--Vintagekits 17:51, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
- I'll be doing just as you suggested Rockpocket. Thanks. WATP (talk) • (contribs) 17:53, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
- Look forward to rubbin it yer face.--Vintagekits 18:00, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
- That'll be after yer block, I take it. - Dudesleeper · Talk 19:20, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
- Look forward to rubbin it yer face.--Vintagekits 18:00, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
- I'll be doing just as you suggested Rockpocket. Thanks. WATP (talk) • (contribs) 17:53, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
- Cool - I am not just going to sit back and let this - slag me off.--Vintagekits 17:51, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Bhoys from Seville
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Bhoys from Seville. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. Ryan Postlethwaite 18:25, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
Major Rivalries
Why you dont let me change the information about the biggest rivalry in Portugal? FC Porto x Benfica ISN'T the biggest match, Porto dont have fans to compete with Benfica and Sporting!!!
I am a benfica fan and the biggeste match in Portugal is sure between Benfica and Sporting, the two major clubes in Portugal and ex-colonies. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.138.110.156 (talk • contribs)
FYI: Several suspected meatpuppets of one editor are involved in the deletion debate.216.194.0.36 19:28, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
Hearts
Revert in Hearts? [1] ? What's? It's Vladimir (in Poland and Russia Władimir), not Roman Romanov. 83.242.76.83 10:36, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for June 18th, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 25 | 18 June 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 09:28, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for your contribution on the above AfD. Your time and effort is much appriciated. regards--Vintagekits 01:14, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
I just created the above article and was wondering if Scotland recognise caps received during wartime periods. - Dudesleeper · Talk 16:32, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
Sorry, I thought it was all final. Given you're supposed to Assume good faith, and all that, seems a bit harsh to give a second-level warning, if any warning at all. LiamUK 11:35, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your understanding. LiamUK 11:42, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
FC Bayern Munich Taskforce
Would you like to join a FC Bayern Munich Taskforce at WikiProject Munich? Kingjeff 20:53, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
Image:Leedsunitedofficialbadge.png
I have tagged Image:Leedsunitedofficialbadge.png as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. BigrTex 19:04, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for June 25th, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 26 | 25 June 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:14, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject Alternative music June 2007 Newsletter
|
Issue 3 - June 2007 | |
|
Riana, Kyjb70 and Scarps joined the alternative music fold during June.
|
You are receiving this newsletter because you have signed up for WikiProject Alternative music. If you wish to stop receiving this newsletter, or would like to receive it in a different form, add your name to the appropriate section here. This newsletter was delivered by the automated R Delivery Bot 00:38, 1 July 2007 (UTC) .
Image:1990s-band.jpg
I have tagged Image:1990s-band.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. MER-C 10:31, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
Glasgow attack
I can take a picture of the cover, with my camera, if it helps? Cs-wolves 20:37, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
Any ideas of what I could use put as the fair use rationale? I only checked the newspaper pictures, and found one on The Herald, which I copied and altered. Or should I have it as self-published, due to the fact it was taken by my camera, but have the non-free newspaper thing there as well. Cs-wolves 20:45, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
Cheers man, I'll do it after the football :) Mon the Scotland! Cs-wolves 21:18, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
Rangers Internationalists
Yes, according to Lamming's Who's Who. I didn't realise at the time but I think Davy Allan has got all such info online at the Scotland section of his site, if you want to check. Caledonian Place 01:57, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for July 2nd, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 27 | 2 July 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:24, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
When you get a chance, would you mind checking the above's article against this profile at the Scottish FA? My Blackpool book doesn't mention his being a Scot, but the Spartacus Educational link in his article does (and that he was an international). Thing is, I can't seem to get his Kilmarnock career (of multiple seasons, mentioned in the Scottish FA profile) to jog with his career at other clubs. I shortened his career at New Brighton Tower in order to get at least one season with Kilmarnock in, but now I'm not even sure it's the same player. Happen to have any more material or guidance? - Dudesleeper · Talk 11:04, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for the input. I made two (1, 2) separate articles. Since there's no mention of either Blackpool or Blackburn in the former's SFA profile, we must assume they are different players, both of Scottish birth. My next job is to find out who else George Anderson played for. - Dudesleeper · Talk 14:43, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for July 9th, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 28 | 9 July 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:23, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
Fitba' banner
Not sure if you've seen it before, but the following is on one of my Scottish-phrase coasters. Feel free to add it to your user page or whatever.
fitba' (fit-baw) Dialect, chiefly Scot. -n. (m) the beautiful game. 2. (f) stupid game involving twenty-two grown men (and three officials of dubious parentage and eyesight) kicking a lump of leather around a field, often sparking irrational behaviour, bad language, and blind devotion to a team or player, to the detriment of normal marital relations. (see fitba' widow).
- Dudesleeper · Talk 15:05, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- Nice, I'll find a use for it somewhere. Cheers. WATP (talk) • (contribs) 15:20, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
Image:Maximo_Park_-_Missing_Songs.jpg
I have tagged Image:Maximo_Park_-_Missing_Songs.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. BigrTex 16:09, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
Page Layout
Hi, I noticed that your page layout seems kind of familiar. I changed the border color of the page so it won't match mine. Cheers. Miranda 06:25, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for July 16th, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 29 | 16 July 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 20:26, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for July 23rd, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 30 | 23 July 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:02, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
Smile
Connell66 has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
- Why thankyou. WATP (talk) • (contribs) 00:22, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
Your revert of an edit to Paul Gascoigne
As one experienced Wikipedian to another, I was disappointed to note your use of the pop-ups facility to revert this edit. The pop-up facility is for vandalism. The editor concerned is not a vandal, but a new editor who evidently does not know the rules. Per WP:BITE I suggest a friendly user warning should have been given. Viewfinder 19:31, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for your message. I don't see the problem with my edit. I don't see anything here saying it is only for vandalism, and neither does the automatic edit summary provided by popups mention vandalism (which it would be fair to argue the original edit - "...Gazza is a bastard..." - was). I was using simply as a speedy method of reverting an edit which clearly did not belong on Wikipedia. With regards to the editor not being a vandal - I'd say his edits up to the point of my revert meet my definition of vandalism. WATP (talk) • (contribs) 19:41, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
Agreed that the comment did not belong on Wikipedia. But note carefully the context of "bastard"; it was the editor's summary of how he sees the public's attitude. He was trying to defend Gazza, and if he has posted to a blog I would have found his contribution commendable. I studied that user's edits too and while they are clearly POV pushing, I think this is still a case of WP:AGF. Viewfinder 20:18, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
- I don't particularly think that any part of that edit was encyclopedic to an extent that it should have been included. If you disagree, feel free to revert me. WATP (talk) • (contribs) 20:20, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
Agreed. Viewfinder 23:43, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject Alternative music July 2007 Newsletter
|
Issue 4 - July 2007 | |
|
Killereditors, Xihix, M2Ys4U and Lostvalley joined the alternative music fold during July.
|
You are receiving this newsletter because you have signed up for WikiProject Alternative music. If you wish to stop receiving this newsletter, or would like to receive it in a different form, add your name to the appropriate section here. This newsletter was delivered by the automated R Delivery Bot 21:27, 2 August 2007 (UTC) .
Signpost updated for July 30th, 2007.
Apologies for the late delivery this week; my plans to handle this while on vacation went awry. Ral315
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 31 | 30 July 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 00:44, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
Poll about Category:FA Premier League clubs and similar categories
I've created a poll to decide what to do with Category:FA Premier League clubs and similar categories at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Football#A_few_category_names. Feel free to vote (and voice your opinions) and alert other related Wikipedians. Thanks. Chanheigeorge 18:37, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
Image:1990s_-_You_Made_Me_Like_It.ogg
I have tagged Image:1990s_-_You_Made_Me_Like_It.ogg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk 19:13, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for August 6th, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 32 | 6 August 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 09:42, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
Your advise is needed here
Hello! I hope you are feeling great. I would like you to view my comments here. Your views on this matter would be much appreciated as well! --Siva1979Talk to me 04:01, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
James Milner Career section
Not really asking for full feedback on this article (although I wouldn’t mind it). I’d just like to know what you feel the best way the divide up the Career section is, by Club, by season, not at all or some other way. Please leave your reply under the section in my talk page named “Milner Career section”. Buc 16:34, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for August 13th, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 33 | 13 August 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 21:13, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for August 20th, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 34 | 20 August 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:06, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
Hi
Hello WATP,
Sorry for the intrusion, I just wondered if you regularly contribute to articles beyond Scottish football? You're obviously an advanced editor, but what caught my eye was your cultural stance on Scotland and its relationship within the United Kingdom. No problem if its not your thing, but there is alot of activity and debate at the moment regarding the best approach to a whole multitude of issues surrounding this topic. Let me know how you feel either way when convenient, Jza84 23:40, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for August 27th, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 35 | 27 August 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:08, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
STALKER WARNING
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to my talk page , you will be blocked from editing.
You really should get out more and continuing to fill up my talk page with stuff from months ago will be seen as harrasment.
- Believe it or not, the user really does have the right to remove warnings from their talk page. I can't find exactly where it says it, but trust me, it does. They should probably archive it, but what they're doing is perfectly fine, so please stop reverting. Ok? Gscshoyru 19:15, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
Thank you Gscshoyru . Unfortunately, i believe this stalker has added me to a watch list of his so i'll need to abandon my identity to create another.