Talk:Supply chain management: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 16:44, 29 August 2007

Proposed merge from Supply chain event management

Any comments on the proposal? - N (talk) 03:57, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No arguments against, so I am merging. --Ezeu 22:18, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

any suggestion on where to get used book for CPIM certification

Proposed merge with Bullwhip effect

This seems like a particular side effect or subtopic of Supply chain management not critical to the topic itself. It seems like merging it would simply diminish interest in the subtopic. I would be opposed to merging. Avt tor 16:03, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I would oppose merging it too. Besides diluting the topic, I think Bullwhip Effect should be discussed by itself and the importance conveyed. There are other spin-offs of SCM similar to Bullwhip Effect which would then be qualified to enter this article. Nshuks7 08:25, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I also oppose merging the Bullwhip Effect page with the general page for supply chain management. The bullwhip effect is important enough to warrant its own entry in wikipedia, yet it is not so central to the field that it warrants inclusion on the SCM page. Sonicace 03:03, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merge from Supply chain diversification

A merge from Supply chain diversification has been proposed. This proposal comes after the proposal to have the said article merged with the article on Procurement in wich I voted against, but suggested considering the merger with this article instead. The tone of the two articles seem non-cohesive, probably because the point of view is of management v.s. operations. I would like to get some imput on this merger. --Emana 17:37, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nobody has given their opinion on this issue for three weeks. Under normal Wikipedia circumstances, the merge will happen, but in the case of this article, there has been so much more content added to it since the proposal of the merger. The new content added veers away from the tone and issue that prompted this merger. In my opinion the merger is no longer appropriate. Therefore, I will rescind the proposal. Remember, the merger can be proposed again by anyone who wishes to do so. --Emana 17:06, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I do not think that the merge should be done, since SCM is a very particular topic of the operation management.

SCM Solutions comparison

SCM solutions are many. Which one is better and Why? SAP or i2 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 221.128.181.120 (talk) 18:23, 11 February 2007 (UTC). It would not be wise to merge these topics[reply]

Reference spam?

Rolf G. Poluha: Application of the SCOR Model in Supply Chain Management. Youngstown, NY 2007, ISBN-10: 1-93404-323-0, ISBN-13: 978-1-934-04-323-3.

I noticed that this was added to the article before it's publication date, as far as I can tell. It was originally added 15 Sept '06 with a different isbn and a publication year of 2006, but I cannot verify either [1]. I think it should be removed unless someone has another explanation. -- Ronz 00:08, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Logistics/SCM association

What are the names of the leading logistics or SCM federations or representations of interests in this field in the U.S., in Russia, and in the European Union? For Europe this may be http://www.elalog.org/ (European Logistics Association). I'm searching for associations like this one. 130.149.169.40 08:55, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

>> CSCMP (Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals) definitely comes to mind: www.cscmp.org

Thank you, so far. Does anybody of you has additional suggestions? 15:28, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

I think that the a reference to the supply chain council should be included as well (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supply-Chain_Council). This standardisation organisation is developing since the mid 1990ies the Supply Chain Operations Reference-model (see also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SCOR). Note further that respective wikepedia articles need considerable rework. I'm laccking the time for this.

Channel Partner

Can someone please add the definition of a "channel partner" That would be helpful in the explanation of SCM. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ac523 (talk • contribs) 18:54, August 24, 2007 (UTC)

@@ Line 35: / Line 35: @@
 ::Thank you, so far. Does anybody of you has additional suggestions? 15:28, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
+I think that the a reference to the supply chain council should be included as well (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supply-Chain_Council). This standardisation organisation is developing since the mid 1990ies the Supply Chain Operations Reference-model (see also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SCOR). Note further that respective wikepedia articles need considerable rework. I'm laccking the time for this.
 == Channel Partner ==
 Can someone please add the definition of a "channel partner"  That would be helpful in the explanation of SCM.  <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Ac523|Ac523]] ([[User talk:Ac523|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Ac523|contribs]]) 18:54, August 24, 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
-I think that the a reference to the supply chain council should be included as well (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supply-Chain_Council). This standardisation organisation is developing since the mid 1990ies the Supply Chain Operations Reference-model (see also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SCOR). Note further that respective wikepedia articles need considerable rework. I'm laccking the time for this.