Template talk:Permission from license selector: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
deleting too early |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
::What do you think about adding, at the bottom, ''Administrators: please, as a courtesy, do not delete this page in the first 15 minutes after its creation, to allow the uploader time to read the tag and attempt to correct the license.'' [[User:Mangojuice|Mango]][[Special:Contributions/Mangojuice|<font color="orange">'''juice'''</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Mangojuice|talk]]</sup> 16:29, 24 July 2006 (UTC) |
::What do you think about adding, at the bottom, ''Administrators: please, as a courtesy, do not delete this page in the first 15 minutes after its creation, to allow the uploader time to read the tag and attempt to correct the license.'' [[User:Mangojuice|Mango]][[Special:Contributions/Mangojuice|<font color="orange">'''juice'''</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Mangojuice|talk]]</sup> 16:29, 24 July 2006 (UTC) |
||
:::I would be very hesitant. If the uploader has the chance to lie about the license, it could easily be abused. On the other hand, posting a message on the subject here and on [[WP:AN]] would not be too bad. [[User:Stifle|Stifle]] ([[User talk:Stifle|talk]]) 21:57, 24 July 2006 (UTC) |
:::I would be very hesitant. If the uploader has the chance to lie about the license, it could easily be abused. On the other hand, posting a message on the subject here and on [[WP:AN]] would not be too bad. [[User:Stifle|Stifle]] ([[User talk:Stifle|talk]]) 21:57, 24 July 2006 (UTC) |
||
::::By offering the option in the first place, people may be misled into thinking that such a license is acceptable. Setting this trap is not nice at all. [[User:AlbertCahalan|AlbertCahalan]] 09:29, 1 September 2007 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 09:29, 1 September 2007
I've revised the template to be shorter and less lectury. The previous version was a bit long-winded about why this is a speedy deletion reason; now, it's hidden behind a link they can look at if they want to, and it's more clear about what to do to fix the problem. Mangojuicetalk 14:43, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
- Good. I re-added the part about not uploading any more images with this tag, and added a CC option. Stifle (talk) 15:32, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
- What do you think about adding, at the bottom, Administrators: please, as a courtesy, do not delete this page in the first 15 minutes after its creation, to allow the uploader time to read the tag and attempt to correct the license. Mangojuicetalk 16:29, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
- I would be very hesitant. If the uploader has the chance to lie about the license, it could easily be abused. On the other hand, posting a message on the subject here and on WP:AN would not be too bad. Stifle (talk) 21:57, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
- By offering the option in the first place, people may be misled into thinking that such a license is acceptable. Setting this trap is not nice at all. AlbertCahalan 09:29, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
- I would be very hesitant. If the uploader has the chance to lie about the license, it could easily be abused. On the other hand, posting a message on the subject here and on WP:AN would not be too bad. Stifle (talk) 21:57, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
- What do you think about adding, at the bottom, Administrators: please, as a courtesy, do not delete this page in the first 15 minutes after its creation, to allow the uploader time to read the tag and attempt to correct the license. Mangojuicetalk 16:29, 24 July 2006 (UTC)