Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/300-page iPhone bill: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 01:04, 2 September 2007

article is recency, no nobility. it is just an anti-at&t rant, and even if it wasnt it doesnt deserve to be in an encyclopedia, none-the-less deserve its own article. Its also just a video, theres millions of videos on the internet. LightSpeed3 01:54, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

~~I agree~~ Merge with iPhone article. A viral video from some teenager should not have a dedicated Wikipedia entry. I vote for the article to be modified to remove references to a specific video and just focus on AT&T and their (then) billing procedures. A sentence like "many AT&T customers expressed their dissatisfaction on the Internet" would suffice. — (edited) 01:04, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Delete. Not notable in the grand scheme of things. Taylor 09:55, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into the main iPhone article. Nwwaew (Talk Page) (Contribs) (E-mail me) 22:50, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I too believe that this is not notable. It is also a one-time incident, and shouldn't be looked at as a precedence for how AT&T or Apple does business. People shouldn't be creating articles that is a blip in the world monitor, and that people will forget about it within a week. Groink 00:30, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 article is recency, no nobility. it is just an anti-at&t rant, and even if it wasnt it doesnt deserve to be in an encyclopedia, none-the-less deserve its own article. Its also just a video, theres millions of videos on the internet. [[User:LightSpeed3|LightSpeed3]] 01:54, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
-:I agree. A viral video from some teenager should not have a dedicated Wikipedia entry. I vote for the article to be ''modified'' to remove references to a specific video and just focus on AT&T and their (then) billing procedures. A sentence like "many AT&T customers expressed their dissatisfaction on the Internet" would suffice. — [[User:Mattrobs|mattrobs]] 04:28, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
+:<s>I agree</s> '''Merge''' with iPhone article. A viral video from some teenager should not have a dedicated Wikipedia entry. I vote for the article to be modified to remove references to a specific video and just focus on AT&T and their (then) billing procedures. A sentence like "many AT&T customers expressed their dissatisfaction on the Internet" would suffice. — (edited) 01:04, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
 :'''Delete.''' Not notable in the grand scheme of things.  [[User:Ytgy111|Taylor]] 09:55, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
 :'''Merge''' into the main iPhone article. <font face="Trebuchet MS">[[User:Nwwaew|Nwwaew]]<small> ([[User_Talk:Nwwaew|Talk Page]]) ([[Special:Contributions/Nwwaew|Contribs]]) ([[Special:Emailuser/Nwwaew|E-mail me]])</small></font> 22:50, 1 September 2007 (UTC)