Talk:Weezer (Blue Album): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 07:13, 2 September 2007

Alternative music B‑class High‑importance

	Rock music portal This article is part of WikiProject Alternative music, a group of Wikipedians interested in improving the encyclopedic coverage of articles relating to alternative rock. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.Alternative musicWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative musicTemplate:WikiProject Alternative musicAlternative music
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Albums B‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Pedal question

why is the fuzzy bass mentioned if it's not added through a pedal? --liam 02:45, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:BuddyHolly(USA).jpg

Image:BuddyHolly(USA).jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:08, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Siascover.jpg

Image:Siascover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 11:38, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Will you assholes please GET OVER the "Fair use rationale" bullshit. You act like the pictures people post on Wikipedia are stolen drafts of the fucking Mona Lisa. It's JUST Wikipedia... deal with that!--69.136.10.51 11:01, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article Review

I'm having this go through a Good article review User:cowbellcity45

Hi cowbell. I think you were looking for Wikipedia:Good article candidates. At Good Article reviews we re-review old GA and disputed GAs to see if they still fit the criteria. To get an article granted GA status, you should go to the candidates page. I know the name is confusing, we're probably gonna change that soon. So in the meantime I hope you don't mind me taking the Weezer listing off the review page. Good luck though. Drewcifer 05:07, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done. / edg ☺ ★ 06:55, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks dude User: cowbellcity45 Aug 31, 2007 15:02

Singles

I removed it because it is just a copied and pasted from the Weezer article. I also moved the information about My evaline and Mykel and Carli to the discography pages.

Rating

I've assessed the article as B as it contains an impressive array of references. It has a slightly stubby feel in places, and, as someone identified, lacks a reception section. For future reference, GAC is not the place to request a rating: it's the place for good article candidates. One of the easiest ways to request a rating is to blank the rating field in the project templates. Good luck with it. The JPS^{talk to me} 15:14, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 15:14, 1 September 2007 edit The JPS (talk \| contribs) Administrators 44,479 edits rating ← Previous edit		Revision as of 07:13, 2 September 2007 edit undo WesleyDodds (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 55,176 edits Er, not quite Next edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Wikiproject Alternative music\|class=B\|importance=~~top~~}}		{{Wikiproject Alternative music\|class=B\|importance=High}}
	{{Album\|class=B\|importance=top}}		{{Album\|class=B\|importance=top}}