Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/B-Con: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 21:33, 20 June 2005

an obvious vanity page... pmam21^talk_articles 03:18, Jun 20, 2005 (UTC)

Delete vanity. -- Jonel | Speak 03:24, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Delete not notable. Pburka 03:27, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Delete vanity. JamesBurns 07:34, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Delete trolls make bad article subjects. Also, I haven't checked the person in question, but it could be an attack on a forum moderator. - Mgm|^(talk) 08:32, Jun 20, 2005 (UTC)
Delete obvious vanity. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 11:11, Jun 20, 2005 (UTC)
Delete for vanity and the lack of notability. Nestea 14:15, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Don't delete. This page was created for a little fun. Read forums.devshed.com for more information. Not a personal attack.

Fun isn't a good criterion for including something in an encyclopedia. - Mgm|^(talk) 21:33, Jun 20, 2005 (UTC)

Speed Delete - It's not even an article, it makes no real claims besides "B-con is a poo face". MPS 17:10, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Delete vanity, absolutely nothing to warrant inclusion here. --Etacar11 19:58, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 *'''Delete''' for vanity and the lack of notability. [[User:Nestea|Nestea]] 14:15, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 Don't delete. This page was created for a little fun. Read forums.devshed.com for more information. Not a personal attack.
+::*Fun isn't a good criterion for including something in an encyclopedia. - [[User:MacGyverMagic|Mgm]]|[[User talk:MacGyverMagic|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 21:33, Jun 20, 2005 (UTC)
 * '''Speed Delete''' - It's not even an article, it makes no real claims besides "B-con is a poo face". [[User:MPS|MPS]] 17:10, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 *'''Delete''' vanity, absolutely nothing to warrant inclusion here. --[[User:Etacar11|Etacar11]] 19:58, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)