Witherspoon v. Illinois: Difference between revisions
Better definition |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
|Overruled=''[[Gregg v. Georgia]]'', {{ussc|428|153|[[1976]]}} |
|Overruled=''[[Gregg v. Georgia]]'', {{ussc|428|153|[[1976]]}} |
||
}} |
}} |
||
'''''Witherspoon v. Illinois''''', [[Case citation|391 U.S. 510]] ([[1968]]), was a [[Supreme Court of the United States|U.S. Supreme Court]] case where the court was asked to decide whether a state statute providing the state unlimited challenge for cause of |
'''''Witherspoon v. Illinois''''', [[Case citation|391 U.S. 510]] ([[1968]]), was a [[Supreme Court of the United States|U.S. Supreme Court]] case where the court was asked to decide whether a state [[statute]] providing the state unlimited challenge for cause of [[juror]]s who might have any objection to the [[death penalty]]. The court decided that the statute, in effect, gave too much bias in favor of the prosecution. |
||
The Court said, {{Cquote|Whatever else might be said of capital punishment, it is at least clear that its imposition by a [[hanging]] jury cannot be squared with the Constitution. The State of [[Illinois]] has stacked the deck against the petitioner. To execute this death sentence would deprive him of his life without due process of law.}} |
The Court said, {{Cquote|Whatever else might be said of capital punishment, it is at least clear that its imposition by a [[hanging]] jury cannot be squared with the Constitution. The State of [[Illinois]] has stacked the deck against the petitioner. To execute this death sentence would deprive him of his life without due process of law.}} |
||
Revision as of 23:22, 3 September 2007
| Witherspoon v. Illinois | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Argued April 24, 1968 Decided June 3, 1968 | |
| Full case name | Witherspoon v. Illinois |
| Citations | 391 U.S. 510 (more) |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinion | |
| Per curiam | |
| Laws applied | |
| Ill. Rev. Stat., c. 38 s. 743, U.S. Const. amends. VIII, XIV | |
Overruled by | |
| Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153 (1976) | |
Witherspoon v. Illinois, 391 U.S. 510 (1968), was a U.S. Supreme Court case where the court was asked to decide whether a state statute providing the state unlimited challenge for cause of jurors who might have any objection to the death penalty. The court decided that the statute, in effect, gave too much bias in favor of the prosecution.
The Court said,
Whatever else might be said of capital punishment, it is at least clear that its imposition by a hanging jury cannot be squared with the Constitution. The State of Illinois has stacked the deck against the petitioner. To execute this death sentence would deprive him of his life without due process of law.
The decision in this case would cause the Supreme Court of California to order a retrial on the penalty phase in the 1972 case of California v. Anderson, and when the case was heard for the third time, would find the imposition of the Death Penalty was unconstitutional on the grounds of the penalty being Cruel and Unusual in violation of the State Constitution. The decision would become national in scale when the U.S. Supreme Court also in 1972 ruled in Furman v. Georgia that all death penalty cases were in violation of the 8th Amendment's prohibition on Cruel and Unusual punishment.
External link
 | This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |