Jump to content

Top quark condensate: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Pertin (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 17: Line 17:
[[William A. Bardeen]], [[Christopher T. Hill]], and [[Manfred Lindner]].
[[William A. Bardeen]], [[Christopher T. Hill]], and [[Manfred Lindner]].
Top quark condensation is
Top quark condensation is
essentialy based upon the "quasi infra-red fixed point" for
essentialy based upon the "quasi-[[infrared fixed point]]" for
the top quark Higgs-Yukawa coupling, proposed in [[1980]] by
the top quark Higgs-Yukawa coupling, proposed in 1981 by
Hill.
[[C. T. Hill]].


In [[1991]], [[Anna Hasenfratz]] and [[Peter Hasenfratz]] ''et al.'' claimed the model is approximately equivalent to a fundamental Higgs scalar field. This equivalence is exact in the limit of the large number of colors. However, even for a finite number of colors, it was claimed that new predictions cannot be derived from a top quark condensate (if the cutoff scale is high). This latter argument, however, presumes extreme notions of physical compositeness, in which a boundstate is essentially decoupled from its constituents near its compositeness scale by superstrong irrelevant operators.
In 1991, [[Anna Hasenfratz]] and [[Peter Hasenfratz]] ''et al.'' claimed the model is approximately equivalent to a fundamental Higgs scalar field. This equivalence is exact in the limit of the large number of colors. However, even for a finite number of colors, it was claimed that new predictions cannot be derived from a top quark condensate (if the cutoff scale is high). This, however, presumes a bizarre notion of physical compositeness, in which a boundstate could be essentially decoupled from its constituents near its compositeness scale by the
effecys superstrong irrelevant operators. Estimates based upon [[Topcolor]], which is a concrete proposal of new dynamics that goes beyond the Standard Model, support the picture of Top Condensation.


Top condensation arises naturally in
Top condensation arises naturally in
[[Topcolor]] models, that are concrete proposals of new gauge extensions of the standard model in analogy to [[Quantum Chromodynamics]].
[[Topcolor]] models, that are extensions of the standard model in analogy to [[Quantum Chromodynamics]].
To be natural, without excessive fine-tuning (i.e. to stabilize the Higgs mass from large [[radiative correction]]s) the theory requires new physics at a relatively low energy scale. Placing new physics at 10 TeV, for instance, the model (incorrectly) predicts that the top quark to be significantly heavier than observed (at about 600 GeV vs. 171 GeV). "[[Top Seesaw]]" models, also based upon [[Topcolor]],
To be natural, without excessive fine-tuning (i.e. to stabilize the Higgs mass from large [[radiative correction]]s), the theory requires new physics at a relatively low energy scale. Placing new physics at 10 TeV, for instance, the model (incorrectly) predicts that the top quark to be significantly heavier than observed (at about 600 GeV vs. 171 GeV). "[[Top Seesaw]]" models, also based upon [[Topcolor]],
circumvent this difficulty. These theories will be tested at the [[LHC]].
circumvent this difficulty. These theories will be tested at the [[LHC]].



Revision as of 05:28, 4 September 2007

The top quark condensate theory is an alternative to the Standard Model in which a fundamental scalar Higgs field is replaced by a composite field composed of the top quark and its antiquark. The top quark is chosen because it is the most massive among all quarks (its mass, currently 171 GeV, is comparable to the electroweak scale).

In group representation theory, a quark is described by a Dirac spinor, which can be thought of as a pair of Weyl spinors describing the left-handed (negative helicity) and the right-handed (positive helicity) quark.

The relevant fields forming the top quark condensate are:

  • The left-handed top quark, belonging to a representation
  • The left-handed antitop antiquark, belonging to representation

In these groups, the left number refers to SU(3) of Quantum chromodynamics, whereas the second denotes the representation under SU(2). The subscript labels the hypercharge.

The top and antitop quark form a bound state described by a composite scalar field, which forms a fermion condensate, which subsequently breaks the electroweak and hypercharge symmetry into electromagnetism.

This model predicts how the electroweak scale may match the top quark mass. The idea was first described by Nambu, and subsequently by Vladimir Miransky, Masaharu Tanabashi, and Koichi Yamawaki. It was developed into a more predictive scheme, based upon the renormalization group, by William A. Bardeen, Christopher T. Hill, and Manfred Lindner. Top quark condensation is essentialy based upon the "quasi-infrared fixed point" for the top quark Higgs-Yukawa coupling, proposed in 1981 by C. T. Hill.

In 1991, Anna Hasenfratz and Peter Hasenfratz et al. claimed the model is approximately equivalent to a fundamental Higgs scalar field. This equivalence is exact in the limit of the large number of colors. However, even for a finite number of colors, it was claimed that new predictions cannot be derived from a top quark condensate (if the cutoff scale is high). This, however, presumes a bizarre notion of physical compositeness, in which a boundstate could be essentially decoupled from its constituents near its compositeness scale by the effecys superstrong irrelevant operators. Estimates based upon Topcolor, which is a concrete proposal of new dynamics that goes beyond the Standard Model, support the picture of Top Condensation.

Top condensation arises naturally in Topcolor models, that are extensions of the standard model in analogy to Quantum Chromodynamics. To be natural, without excessive fine-tuning (i.e. to stabilize the Higgs mass from large radiative corrections), the theory requires new physics at a relatively low energy scale. Placing new physics at 10 TeV, for instance, the model (incorrectly) predicts that the top quark to be significantly heavier than observed (at about 600 GeV vs. 171 GeV). "Top Seesaw" models, also based upon Topcolor, circumvent this difficulty. These theories will be tested at the LHC.


See also

References