Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/KaintheScion et al./Proposed decision: Difference between revisions

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Kelly Martin (talk | contribs)
17,726 edits
m Reverted edits by 24.239.151.125 to last version by Chanting Fox
rv vandalism. RFAr in bad faith is RFAr in bad faith. ArbCom cannot be trusted nor can the admins who illegitimately add users to an RFAr out of spite.
Line 1: Line 1:
This was supposed to be a RFAr against KaintheScion and possible ElKabong as a sockpuppet, not Enviroknot.
''all proposed''


This is just typical ArbCom bullshit and abuse of power.
Arbitrators should vote for or against each point or abstain.
*Only items that receive a majority "support" vote will be passed.
*Items that receive a majority "oppose" vote will be formally rejected.
*Items that do not receive a majority "support" or "oppose" vote will be open to possible amendment by any Arbitrator if he so chooses. After the amendment process is complete, the item will be voted on one last time.

Conditional votes for or against and abstentions should be explained by the Arbitrator before or after his/her time-stamped signature. For example, an Arbitrator can state that she/he would only favor a particular remedy based on whether or not another remedy/remedies were passed.

On this case, 1 Arbitrators is recused and 3 are inactive, so 5 votes are a majority.

;For all items:
Proposed wording to be modified by Arbitrators and then voted on. Non-arbitrators may comment on the talk page.

==Motions and requests by the parties==
Place those on the [[Wikipedia talk:{{PAGENAME}}|discussion page]].

==Proposed temporary injunctions==
''Four net "support" votes needed to pass (each "oppose" vote subtracts a "support")''<br>
<small>24 hours from the first vote is ''normally'' the fastest an injunction will be imposed.</small>

===Template===
1)
<!-- uncomment and un-nowiki when injunction enacted <nowiki>
'''Enacted''' on ~~~~~
</nowiki> -->
{text of proposed orders}

:Support:
:#

:Oppose:
:#

:Abstain:
:#

===Temporary injunction===
1) <!-- uncomment and un-nowiki when injunction enacted <nowiki>
'''Enacted''' on ~~~~~
</nowiki> -->[[User:Enviroknot]] using any account is prohibited from editing any Wikipedia page other then his talk page and the pages of this arbitration until a final decision is made in this case.

:Support:
:# [[User:Fred Bauder|Fred Bauder]] 20:02, Jun 21, 2005 (UTC)
:# [[User:Raul654|&rarr;Raul654]] 06:25, Jun 22, 2005 (UTC)
:# [[User:Ambi|Ambi]] 17:22, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

:Oppose:
:#

:Abstain:
:#

=Proposed final decision=

==Proposed principles==

===Template===
1) {text of proposed principle}

:Support:
:#

:Oppose:
:#

:Abstain:
:#

===Sockpuppets===
1) While is is permissible for a person to have several user accounts on Wikipedia, such accounts may be misused in a variety of ways. When there is uncertainty whether a party is one user with sockpuppets or several users with similar editing habits they may be treated as one user with sockpuppets, see [[Wikipedia:Sock puppet]]

:Support:
:# [[User:Fred Bauder|Fred Bauder]] 19:48, Jun 21, 2005 (UTC)
:# [[User:Ambi|Ambi]] 17:22, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

:Oppose:
:#

:Abstain:
:#

====Template:Sockpuppet====
1.1) While controversial and perhaps exacerbating conflict, it is acceptable to place [[Template:Sockpuppet]] on the user page of a suspected account together with links to supporting evidence, see [[Wikipedia:Sock_puppet#Tagging_identified_sock_puppets]].

:Support:
:# [[User:Fred Bauder|Fred Bauder]] 18:03, Jun 21, 2005 (UTC)
:# [[User:Ambi|Ambi]] 17:22, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

:Oppose:
:#

:Abstain:
:#

===No personal attacks===
2) Personal attacks and disparaging remarks directed at other users are unacceptable, see [[Wikipedia:No personal attacks]]

:Support:
:# [[User:Fred Bauder|Fred Bauder]] 19:47, Jun 21, 2005 (UTC)
:# [[User:Ambi|Ambi]] 17:22, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

:Oppose:
:#

:Abstain:
:#

===Advocacy===
3) Wikipedia is not a platform for advocacy, see [[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not]].

:Support:
:# [[User:Fred Bauder|Fred Bauder]] 19:47, Jun 21, 2005 (UTC)
:# [[User:Ambi|Ambi]] 17:22, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

:Oppose:
:#

:Abstain:
:#

===Editing bans===
4) Wikipedia editors may be banned from articles where their point of view advocacy has proven disruptive.

:Support:
:# [[User:Fred Bauder|Fred Bauder]] 19:47, Jun 21, 2005 (UTC)
:# [[User:Ambi|Ambi]] 17:22, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

:Oppose:
:#

:Abstain:
:#

== Proposed findings of fact ==

===Template===
1) {text of proposed finding of fact}

:Support:
:#

:Oppose:
:#

:Abstain:
:#

===Sockpuppets===
1) {{User|ElKabong}}, {{User|Enviroknot}}, {{User|KaintheScion}}, {{user|66.69.141.11}}, {{user|129.7.35.1}}, {{User:38.112.194.37}}, {{User:136.145.54.123}} and possibly {{User|207.241.238.149}}, and {{User|64.229.186.50}} are controlled by the same person [[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive22#User:KaintheScion_and_User:ElKabong]], [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/KaintheScion_et_al./Evidence#Evidence_of_Sockpuppetry]]

:Support:
:# [[User:Fred Bauder|Fred Bauder]] 15:40, Jun 21, 2005 (UTC)
:# [[User:Ambi|Ambi]] 17:22, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

:Oppose:
:#

:Abstain:
:#

===Template:Sockpuppet===
2) [[Template:Sockpuppet]] has been placed on [[User:ElKabong]], [[User:Enviroknot]] and [[User:KaintheScion]]. Placement of the template has been vigorously contested by Environot, see [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User:Enviroknot&action=history page history], [[Template talk:Sockpuppet]], [[Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion/Log/Not_deleted/April_2005#Template:Sockpuppet]], [[Wikipedia_talk:Administrators%27_noticeboard#Vandalizing_my_user_page]], [[Wikipedia_talk:Administrators%27_noticeboard#My_user_page.2C_once_again_vandalized]] and [[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard#Sockpuppet_template]]

:Support:
:# [[User:Fred Bauder|Fred Bauder]] 17:36, Jun 21, 2005 (UTC)
:# [[User:Ambi|Ambi]] 17:22, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

:Oppose:
:#

:Abstain:
:#

===Islamofascism and Islamic fascism===
3) [[User:Enviroknot]] strongly advocated retention and elaboration of the articles [[Islamofascism]] and [[Islamic fascism]], since redirected to [[Neofascism and religion]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:Islamic_fascism&diff=14331094&oldid=14331068] [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:Islamic_fascism&diff=next&oldid=14331147], see [[Talk:Islamofascism]].

:Support:
:# [[User:Fred Bauder|Fred Bauder]] 19:08, Jun 21, 2005 (UTC)
:# [[User:Ambi|Ambi]] 17:22, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

:Oppose:
:#

:Abstain:
:#

===Attacks on "Islamists"===
3) [[User:Enviroknot]] has made personal attacks on his Wikipedia opponents who he perceives as "Islamist." [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Jizya&diff=15147411&oldid=15147371], [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Islamofascism&diff=15148534&oldid=15148480], [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Islamofascism&diff=15127419&oldid=15127377], [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Zionist_terrorism&diff=15127608&oldid=15127403] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:Islamofascism&diff=prev&oldid=14115142]

:Support:
:# [[User:Fred Bauder|Fred Bauder]] 19:29, Jun 21, 2005 (UTC)
:# [[User:Ambi|Ambi]] 17:22, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

:Oppose:
:#

:Abstain:
:#

==Proposed remedies==
<small>''Note: All remedies that refer to a period of time, for example to a ban of X months or a revert parole of Y months, are to run concurrently unless otherwise stated.''</small>

===Template===
1) {text of proposed remedy}

:Support:
:#

:Oppose:
:#

:Abstain:
:#

===One account===
1) [[User:Enviroknot]] is required use the account Enviroknot and no other.

:Support:
:# [[User:Fred Bauder|Fred Bauder]] 19:56, Jun 21, 2005 (UTC)

:Oppose:
:#

:Abstain:
:#

===Ban on editing===
2) [[User:Enviroknot]] is banned from editing articles or associated talk pages which relate to Islam for one year, this includes posting on the talk pages of other users material which relates to Islam.

:Support:
:# [[User:Fred Bauder|Fred Bauder]] 19:56, Jun 21, 2005 (UTC) (2nd choice)

:Oppose:
:# Too light - I see no reason why this user should edit Wikipedia again. [[User:Ambi|Ambi]] 17:22, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

:Abstain:
:#

===One year ban===
2.1) [[User:Enviroknot]] is banned from editing Wikipedia for one year.

:Support:
:# [[User:Ambi|Ambi]] 17:22, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
:# [[User:Fred Bauder|Fred Bauder]] 18:07, Jun 22, 2005 (UTC)
:#

:Oppose:
:#

:Abstain:
:#

===Personal attack parole===
3) [[User:Enviroknot]] is placed on personal attack parole for one year.
:Support:
:# [[User:Fred Bauder|Fred Bauder]] 19:56, Jun 21, 2005 (UTC) (2nd choice)
:#

:Oppose:
:# Not necessary in the event of a ban. [[User:Ambi|Ambi]] 17:22, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

:Abstain:
:#

==Proposed enforcement==

===Template===
1) {text of proposed enforcement}

:Support:
:#

:Oppose:
:#

:Abstain:
:#

===Short bans===
1) In the event [[User:Enviroknot]] violates the remedies adopted in this matter he may be banned for a short period, up to a week in the case of repeat offenses.

:Support:
:# [[User:Fred Bauder|Fred Bauder]] 20:07, Jun 21, 2005 (UTC)

:Oppose:
:# Not necessarily in light of a full ban. [[User:Ambi|Ambi]] 17:22, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

:Abstain:
:#

===Sock puppets===
2) Verified use of sockpuppet while a temporary block is in place shall result in a ban from editing Wikipedia for one month.

:Support:
:# [[User:Fred Bauder|Fred Bauder]] 20:07, Jun 21, 2005 (UTC) (2nd choice)

:Oppose:
:# Not necessary in light of a full ban. [[User:Ambi|Ambi]] 17:22, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

:Abstain:
:#

2.1) Verified use of sockpuppets while the one year ban is in place shall result in the ban being reset, as per policy.

:Support:
:# [[User:Ambi|Ambi]] 17:22, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
:# [[User:Fred Bauder|Fred Bauder]] 18:08, Jun 22, 2005 (UTC)
:#

:Oppose:
:#

:Abstain:
:#

=Discussion by Arbitrators=
==General==

==Motion to close==
''Four net "support" votes needed to close case (each "oppose" vote subtracts a "support")''<br>
<small>24 hours from the first motion is normally the fastest a case will close. </small>

:#

Revision as of 03:35, 23 June 2005

This was supposed to be a RFAr against KaintheScion and possible ElKabong as a sockpuppet, not Enviroknot.

This is just typical ArbCom bullshit and abuse of power.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/KaintheScion_et_al./Proposed_decision&oldid=15666862"