Jump to content

Talk:Lists of scientists: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Done, the list has been disaggregated to the specific categories
kewl
Line 3: Line 3:
:"Scientists" is way too broad and is therefore useless (lists of physicists, biologists, chemists, etc are fine though). This page is as useful as a [[list of authors]] would be. --[[User:Maveric149|mav]]
:"Scientists" is way too broad and is therefore useless (lists of physicists, biologists, chemists, etc are fine though). This page is as useful as a [[list of authors]] would be. --[[User:Maveric149|mav]]


---
-----
Done, the list has been disaggregated to the specific categories. [[User:DavidLevinson|dml]]
Done, the list has been disaggregated to the specific categories. [[User:DavidLevinson|dml]]

:Coolness - nice work. --[[User:Maveric149|mav]]

Revision as of 20:58, 3 September 2002

Do we need a general "List of scientists" and lists of physicists, biologists, chemists, etc. Can this be disaggregated and deleted ? dml

"Scientists" is way too broad and is therefore useless (lists of physicists, biologists, chemists, etc are fine though). This page is as useful as a list of authors would be. --mav

Done, the list has been disaggregated to the specific categories. dml

Coolness - nice work. --mav