Jump to content

Template talk:North London Line: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Pickle UK (talk | contribs)
Line 5: Line 5:


:Addendum. The DLR between Canning Town and Prince Regent is shown as a parallel route, yet when this was done to the [[Northern City Line]] it was removed!! Can we PLEASE, have some consistency in this aspect of the maps. Either we do, or do not, show parallel routes. We must not have ambiguity. [[User:Canterberry|Canterberry]] 21:08, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
:Addendum. The DLR between Canning Town and Prince Regent is shown as a parallel route, yet when this was done to the [[Northern City Line]] it was removed!! Can we PLEASE, have some consistency in this aspect of the maps. Either we do, or do not, show parallel routes. We must not have ambiguity. [[User:Canterberry|Canterberry]] 21:08, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

::I think it should be a route map - for it to be a track map should surely show every line! It also makes it harder to read on the double-track section. [[User:A is to B as B is to C|A is to B as B is to C]] 16:15, 24 September 2007 (UTC)


== Letters ==
== Letters ==

Revision as of 16:15, 24 September 2007

WikiProject iconTrains: in UK Template‑class
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Associated projects or task forces:
Taskforce icon
This template is supported by WikiProject UK Railways.

Map

I think the map is a good "starter for ten" ... but I think we can improve it. There has been a lot of discussion Talk:Thameslink on whether maps should be "route maps" or "track maps". The debate is still open, but I think that the issue of the No.1 and No.2 lines between Camden and Dalston brings this into focus. Do we need to show a split? I only ask the question ... I have my views, but I do not intend to reveal them just yet. Also, should the "core route" be straight?? This issue was examined on the Watford DC Line, but this template "kinks" the main route. Is this right??? Again, I only ask the question. Overall, I give the map 7/10, and I look forward to further improvements. Well done User:DrFrench. Canterberry 21:03, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Addendum. The DLR between Canning Town and Prince Regent is shown as a parallel route, yet when this was done to the Northern City Line it was removed!! Can we PLEASE, have some consistency in this aspect of the maps. Either we do, or do not, show parallel routes. We must not have ambiguity. Canterberry 21:08, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I think it should be a route map - for it to be a track map should surely show every line! It also makes it harder to read on the double-track section. A is to B as B is to C 16:15, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Letters

I feel like i'm being stupid but are most of the letters on there to indicate direction as in North, South, East and West? Simply south 14:30, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I presume as much, i didn't add them but for a horse shoe shapped line like the NLL maybee its vital Pickle 15:00, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]