Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vincenzo Perrella: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 03:25, 26 September 2007

Vincenzo Perrella

Article is either a vanity piece about a non-notable individual or a hoax (probably the former). I can't uncover anything of significance about the subject and I understand that there's no such thing as a "Governor's prize" in this particular jurisdiction. 4 separate WP:SPA's have updated the article. —Moondyne 01:56, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - nothing in expected info sources (Libraries where copyright/publishing details would identify items that never hit any part of google - there are many local publications that are notable that dont hit google) to verify any of the claimed publications (that is the claimed english or italian publications) - I would be strongly for the pursuit/checkuser of the creator(s) - as the attempt at a hoax like this suggests a possible repeat offender - or an excellent example of a possible setup - the speedier it goes the better Satu Suro 02:09, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. per nomination. Renee 02:34, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Probable hoax. Non-notable, at any rate. Google Book Search for both author and book turn up nothing.--Sethacus 03:03, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I find it difficult to believe that the West Australian would do a book review on their page 2. —Moondyne 03:14, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Reply - they have not done so in the last ten years Satu Suro 03:16, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. ——Moondyne 02:00, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - As HOAX. The picture looks as if it's been edited with an image software anyway... Spawn Man 03:25, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 {{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}}
-*<small>'''Note''':  This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Australia|list of Australia-related deletions]].  </small><small>—&mdash;[[User talk:Moondyne|''Moondyne'']] 02:00, 26 September 2007 (UTC)</small>
 :{{la|Vincenzo Perrella}} – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vincenzo Perrella|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2007 September 26#{{anchorencode:Vincenzo Perrella}}|View log]])</noinclude>
 Article is either a vanity piece about a non-notable individual or a hoax (probably the former).  I can't uncover anything of significance about the subject and I understand that there's no such thing as a "Governor's prize" in this particular jurisdiction.  4 separate [[WP:SPA]]'s have updated the article. &mdash;[[User talk:Moondyne|''Moondyne'']] 01:56, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
@@ Line 9: / Line 8: @@
 *'''Delete''' Probable hoax. Non-notable, at any rate. Google Book Search for both author and book turn up nothing.--[[User:Sethacus|Sethacus]] 03:03, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
 *'''Comment''' - I find it difficult to believe that the ''[[West Australian]]'' would do a book review on their page 2. &mdash;[[User talk:Moondyne|''Moondyne'']] 03:14, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
-*'''Reply''' - they have not done so in the last ten years [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 03:16, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
+**'''Reply''' - they have not done so in the last ten years [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 03:16, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
+*<small>'''Note''':  This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Australia|list of Australia-related deletions]].  </small><small>—&mdash;[[User talk:Moondyne|''Moondyne'']] 02:00, 26 September 2007 (UTC)</small>
+*'''Delete''' - As HOAX. The picture looks as if it's been edited with an image software anyway... [[User:Spawn Man|Spawn Man]] 03:25, 26 September 2007 (UTC)