Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vincenzo Perrella: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 15:56, 26 September 2007

Vincenzo Perrella

Article is either a vanity piece about a non-notable individual or a hoax (probably the former). I can't uncover anything of significance about the subject and I understand that there's no such thing as a "Governor's prize" in this particular jurisdiction. 4 separate WP:SPA's have updated the article. —Moondyne 01:56, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - nothing in expected info sources (Libraries where copyright/publishing details would identify items that never hit any part of google - there are many local publications that are notable that dont hit google) to verify any of the claimed publications (that is the claimed english or italian publications) - I would be strongly for the pursuit/checkuser of the creator(s) - as the attempt at a hoax like this suggests a possible repeat offender - or an excellent example of a possible setup - the speedier it goes the better - there is nothing probable or possible about it - it is a hoax - google or no google Satu Suro 02:09, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. per nomination. Renee 02:34, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Probable hoax. Non-notable, at any rate. Google Book Search for both author and book turn up nothing.--Sethacus 03:03, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I find it difficult to believe that the West Australian would do a book review on their page 2. —Moondyne 03:14, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Reply - they have not done so in the last ten years SatuSuro 03:16, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - Comment The Western Australian review supposedly came out almost 13 years ago.--Sethacus 03:27, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. ——Moondyne 02:00, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - As HOAX. The picture looks as if it's been edited with an image software anyway... Spawn Man 03:25, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:V. -- Satori Son 03:29, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for definite lack of notability and possible hoax. Bfigura ^(talk) 03:31, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - As SETUP. I initiated this article as a setup. Mr.Bobby.V 07:05, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, I cant find the book in NLA, Worldcat, or Google. John Vandenberg 11:06, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It's a set up. We are taking the piss. Azucar79 12:28, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment If this is a 'setup', as two above editors have said, shouldn't the author be warned/blocked?--Sethacus 15:56, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 17: / Line 17: @@
 * '''Delete''', I cant find the book in NLA, Worldcat, or [http://www.google.com.au/search?q=%22The+Agonies+of+the+Damned%22+perrella Google]. [[User:Jayvdb|John Vandenberg]] 11:06, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
 * '''Delete''' It's a set up. We are taking the piss. [[User:Azucar79|Azucar79]] 12:28, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
+*'''Comment''' If this is a 'setup', as two above editors have said, shouldn't the author be warned/blocked?--[[User:Sethacus|Sethacus]] 15:56, 26 September 2007 (UTC)