User talk:24.18.130.89

This is your only warning. The next time you make a personal attack as you did at Talk:Matt Sanchez, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Krimpet 05:19, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

Blocked for one week for assorted trolling, personal attacks, incivility and other disruption at User talk:Truthjusticeamericanway, after sufficient warning. Your comment "this account was blocked almost immediately after I opened it. I didn't have time to participate in anything else" suggests you are that same user evading a block, which is also prohibited. Comments including "Elonka, a liar who is...", "Hey idiot, this account was blocked almost immediately after I opened it"... and "What a pathetic bunch of losers you, JBBscribe and your friend Matt Sanchez are" don't help, either. Daniel→♦ 08:07, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Talk:Matt Sanchez

This is your last warning.
If you continue to make personal attacks on other people as you did at Talk:Matt Sanchez, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. I have reverted ALL of your edits as a single group, as they all contained personal attacks against Sanchez. I have also mentioned this incident to an uninvolved admin, who can decide if you need to be blocked again. Horologium t-c 12:02, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

You should re-word your warning: "I am from Wikipedia and I will NOT stand for truth in these pages!" —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.18.130.89 (talk) 16:48, August 22, 2007 (UTC)

Blocked for a month for disruption stemming from incivility and personal attacks. In addition to your previous block for similar things, comments like "Sanchez, you are a homosexual, so your input should be rejected too", "It is people like you who have made Wikipedia such a joke", "Wikipedia is hiding details about Sanchez's past. He was a whore throughout the 1990s and throughout this decade, but this website has censored that information", "Don't worry, [name removed], we know that you haven't given analingus to other men on screen since, oh, what was it, 1994?", etc. etc., all in the last day after being told to stop it, are extremely disruptive and do not assist in creating a collaborative encyclopedia. Cut it out, please. Daniel 23:53, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Blocked

As you are again editing from this IP to avoid the block on your account(s), I have blocked this IP from editing Wikipedia for 6 months. WjBscribe 20:24, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Hey WJBscribe, I thought your sham encyclopedia had rules about good faith, etc. All you had to do was read the section right above this one. In fact (remember "facts?") the block had lasted for one month and had expired. There was no "evasion" at all. That's one more of your cheesy little lies. However, telling lies doesn't faze you one little bit, does it? After all, WJBscribe, you are immortalized in The New York Times for saying the following about Ryan Jordan, a senior Wikipedia administrator who was exposed for resume fraud in early 2007:

Just wanted to express my 100 percent support for everything you do around here. I think you were totally entitled to protect your identity. Don't let the fuss get you down!

Birds of a feather, huh WJBscribe? You wouldn't know a fact if it slithered up behind you and bit you on the ass. Love you, love Wikipedia! Is it any wonder that the "user-edited encyclopedia" is now the punch line of jokes all around the world? In any case, a Google search for "Matt Sanchez" yields my site just below Wikipedia's fraudulent article. Make sure to read the section that discusses Wikipedia, and you. Unlike Wikipedia's pack of lies, it tells the truth. How does it feel to know that not only Wikipedia, but you personally, have been exposed for what you are? 24.18.130.89 22:12, 26 September 2007 (UTC)