Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Communist terrorism: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Delete "Communist terrorism" |
Nick mallory (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:{{la|Communist terrorism}} – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Communist terrorism|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2007 September 30#{{anchorencode:Communist terrorism}}|View log]])</noinclude> |
:{{la|Communist terrorism}} – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Communist terrorism|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2007 September 30#{{anchorencode:Communist terrorism}}|View log]])</noinclude> |
||
* '''Delete'''. Non-notable [[neologism]]. The phrase "communist terrorism" is occasionally used to refer to many different things, but there is no clear definition of the term and it is never used in counterterrorism scholarship. The page is a barely readable hodge-podge of [[WP:SYN]] violations, bringing a number of organizations together under the umbrella, using [[WP:FRINGE]] theories like Pacepa's ridiculous claim that the KGB created the PLO and making them seem mainstream. It cites people talking about "[[Red terror]]" and combines it with material about theorists like [[Nechaev]] and [[Bakunin]] (more widely understood as anarchists than communists) and other material. Nearly every citation I've looked at on the page is taken out of context to try to make a case for "communist terrorism." [[User:Commodore Sloat|csloat]] 07:35, 30 September 2007 (UTC) |
* '''Delete'''. Non-notable [[neologism]]. The phrase "communist terrorism" is occasionally used to refer to many different things, but there is no clear definition of the term and it is never used in counterterrorism scholarship. The page is a barely readable hodge-podge of [[WP:SYN]] violations, bringing a number of organizations together under the umbrella, using [[WP:FRINGE]] theories like Pacepa's ridiculous claim that the KGB created the PLO and making them seem mainstream. It cites people talking about "[[Red terror]]" and combines it with material about theorists like [[Nechaev]] and [[Bakunin]] (more widely understood as anarchists than communists) and other material. Nearly every citation I've looked at on the page is taken out of context to try to make a case for "communist terrorism." [[User:Commodore Sloat|csloat]] 07:35, 30 September 2007 (UTC) |
||
*''Keep'' So none of the thirty odd sources quoted in the piece matter then? Lt. Gen. [[Ion Mihai Pacepa]], the highest-ranking intelligence official to have defect from the Soviet bloc, would disagree with the assertion that 'communist terrorism' isn't a useful term. This from a piece in the Wall Street Journal site [http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110010438] on August 7, 2007. 'The final goal of our anti-American offensive was to discourage the U.S. from protecting the world against ''' communist terrorism''' and expansion. Sadly, we succeeded. After U.S. forces precipitously pulled out of Vietnam, the victorious communists massacred some two million people in Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia. Another million tried to escape, but many died in the attempt. This tragedy also created a credibility gap between America and the rest of the world, damaged the cohesion of American foreign policy, and poisoned domestic debate in the U.S.' [[User:Nick mallory|Nick mallory]] 09:09, 30 September 2007 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 09:09, 30 September 2007
- Communist terrorism (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- Delete. Non-notable neologism. The phrase "communist terrorism" is occasionally used to refer to many different things, but there is no clear definition of the term and it is never used in counterterrorism scholarship. The page is a barely readable hodge-podge of WP:SYN violations, bringing a number of organizations together under the umbrella, using WP:FRINGE theories like Pacepa's ridiculous claim that the KGB created the PLO and making them seem mainstream. It cites people talking about "Red terror" and combines it with material about theorists like Nechaev and Bakunin (more widely understood as anarchists than communists) and other material. Nearly every citation I've looked at on the page is taken out of context to try to make a case for "communist terrorism." csloat 07:35, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep So none of the thirty odd sources quoted in the piece matter then? Lt. Gen. Ion Mihai Pacepa, the highest-ranking intelligence official to have defect from the Soviet bloc, would disagree with the assertion that 'communist terrorism' isn't a useful term. This from a piece in the Wall Street Journal site [1] on August 7, 2007. 'The final goal of our anti-American offensive was to discourage the U.S. from protecting the world against communist terrorism and expansion. Sadly, we succeeded. After U.S. forces precipitously pulled out of Vietnam, the victorious communists massacred some two million people in Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia. Another million tried to escape, but many died in the attempt. This tragedy also created a credibility gap between America and the rest of the world, damaged the cohesion of American foreign policy, and poisoned domestic debate in the U.S.' Nick mallory 09:09, 30 September 2007 (UTC)