Talk:Leading-edge slot: Difference between revisions
→"slats" being considered retractable by definition: new section |
m Signing comment by 134.84.19.219 - "→"slats" being considered retractable by definition: new section" |
||
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
Slat http://www.b737.org.uk/le_slat.jpg |
Slat http://www.b737.org.uk/le_slat.jpg |
||
Slat http://www.stolspeed.com/uploads/images/Slats.jpg |
Slat http://www.stolspeed.com/uploads/images/Slats.jpg |
||
Slot http://www.tetonaviation.com/HU-16A_files/slot.jpg <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/134.84.19.219|134.84.19.219]] ([[User talk:134.84.19.219|talk]]) 18:40, 1 October 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
Slot http://www.tetonaviation.com/HU-16A_files/slot.jpg |
Revision as of 18:42, 1 October 2007
Aviation: Aircraft Start‑class | |||||||||||||||||||
|
VFD Result
The result of the VFD can be found here: Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Slot -- AllyUnion (talk) 00:35, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Looks like a keeper
This is now much more than a simple definition. A bit more than a stub. --Colputt 01:44, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
"slats" being considered retractable by definition
I corrected this earlier, but it seems to have been reverted. A slat is not necessarily retractable, although it often is. The definitive difference between a slot and a slat is that a slot is a notch cut out of an existing airfoil, while a slat is formed by an add-on structure outside the defined airfoil. I need to hunt down some support for this, but I recall this being the definition used in all of my aerospace engineering textbooks.
To be clear:
Slat http://www.zenithair.com/stolch701/pic06/slat.jpg Slat http://www.b737.org.uk/le_slat.jpg Slat http://www.stolspeed.com/uploads/images/Slats.jpg Slot http://www.tetonaviation.com/HU-16A_files/slot.jpg —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.84.19.219 (talk) 18:40, 1 October 2007 (UTC)