Tier 1 network: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{tbound heavy bandwidth (which is significantly easier to deliver for the sending network than the receiving network), other members may |
{{tbound heavy bandwidth (which is significantly easier to deliver for the sending network than the receiving network), other members may m1 networks usually havmong people discussing Tier 1 networks is the concept of a "regional Tier 1". A regional Tier 1 network is a network which is not transit free globally, but which maintains many of the classic behaviors and motivations of a Tier 1 network within a specific region. |
||
==Routing issues== |
|||
Because a Tier 1 does not have any alternate transit paths, Internet traffic between any two Tier 1 networks is critically dependent on the peering relationship. If two Tier 1 networks arrive at an impasse and discontinue peering with each other (usually in a unilateral decision by one side), [[multihoming|single-homed]] customers of each network will not be able to reach the customers of the other network. This effectively "partitions" the Internet, so that one portion cannot talk to another portion, which has happened several times during the history of the Internet. Those portions of the Internet typically remain partitioned until one side purchases transit (thus losing its "Tier 1" status), or until the collective pain of the outage and/or threat of litigation motivates the two networks to resume voluntary [[peering]]. |
|||
It is important to remark here that Tier-2 (and lower) ISP and their customers are normally unaffected by these partitions because they can have traffic with more than one tier-1 provider. |
|||
==Marketing issues== |
|||
Because there is no formal definition or authoritative body which determines who is and is not a Tier 1, the term is often misused as a marketing slogan rather than an accurate technical description of a network. Frequent misconceptions of the "tier hierarchy" include: |
|||
* Tier 1 networks are closer to the "center" of the Internet. |
|||
** In reality, Tier 1 networks usually have only a small number of peers (typically only other Tier 1s and very large Tier 2s), while Tier 2 networks are motivated to peer with many other Tier 2 and end-user networks. Thus a Tier 2 network with good peering is frequently much "closer" to most end users or content than a Tier 1. |
|||
* Tier 1 networks by definition offer "better" quality Internet connectivity. |
|||
** By definition, there are networks which Tier 1 networks have only one path to, and if they lose that path, they have no "backup transit" which would preserve their full connectivity. |
|||
** Some Tier 2 networks are significantly larger than some Tier 1 networks, and are often able to provide more or better connectivity. |
|||
* Tier 2 networks are "resellers" of Tier 1 networks. |
|||
** Only Tier 3 networks (who provide Internet access) are true "resellers", while many large Tier 2 networks peer with the majority or even vast majority of the Internet directly except for a small portion of the Internet which is reached via a transit provider. |
|||
Because the "tier" ranking system is used in marketing and sales, a long-held though generally misguided view among customers is that they should "only purchase from a Tier 1". Because of this, many networks claim to be Tier 1 even though they are not, while honest networks may lose business to those who only wish to purchase from a Tier 1. The frequent misuse of the term has led to a corruption of the meaning, whereby almost every network claims to be a Tier 1 even though it is not. The issue is further complicated by the almost universal use of [[non-disclosure agreement]]s among Tier 1 networks, which prevent the disclosure of details regarding their settlement-free interconnections. |
|||
Some of the incorrect measurements which are commonly cited include numbers of [[router]]s, route miles of fiber optic cable, or number of customers using a particular network. These are all valid ways to measure the size, scope, capacity, and importance of a network, but they have no direct relationship to Tier 1 status. |
|||
Another common area of debate is whether it is possible to become a Tier 1 through the purchase of "[[paid peering]]", or [[settlement-based interconnection]]s, whereby a network "buys" the status of Tier 1 rather than achieving it through settlement-free means. While this may simulate the routing behaviors of a Tier 1 network, it does not simulate the financial or political peering motivations, and is thus considered by most Peering Coordinators to not be a true Tier 1 for most discussions. |
|||
==Global issues== |
|||
{{seealso|Internet Exchange Point}} |
|||
A common point of contention among people discussing Tier 1 networks is the concept of a "regional Tier 1". A regional Tier 1 network is a network which is not transit free globally, but which maintains many of the classic behaviors and motivations of a Tier 1 network within a specific region. |
|||
A typical scenario for this behavior involves a network that was the incumbent telecommunications company in a specific country or region, usually tied to some level of government-supported monopoly. Within their specific countries or regions of origin, these networks maintain peering policies which mimic those of Tier 1 networks (such as lack of openness to new peering relationships and having existins do not meet the requirements of a true global Tier 1 because they are not transit free globally. |
A typical scenario for this behavior involves a network that was the incumbent telecommunications company in a specific country or region, usually tied to some level of government-supported monopoly. Within their specific countries or regions of origin, these networks maintain peering policies which mimic those of Tier 1 networks (such as lack of openness to new peering relationships and having existins do not meet the requirements of a true global Tier 1 because they are not transit free globally. |
||
Revision as of 16:08, 2 October 2007
{{tbound heavy bandwidth (which is significantly easier to deliver for the sending network than the receiving network), other members may m1 networks usually havmong people discussing Tier 1 networks is the concept of a "regional Tier 1". A regional Tier 1 network is a network which is not transit free globally, but which maintains many of the classic behaviors and motivations of a Tier 1 network within a specific region.
A typical scenario for this behavior involves a network that was the incumbent telecommunications company in a specific country or region, usually tied to some level of government-supported monopoly. Within their specific countries or regions of origin, these networks maintain peering policies which mimic those of Tier 1 networks (such as lack of openness to new peering relationships and having existins do not meet the requirements of a true global Tier 1 because they are not transit free globally.
History
The original Internet backbone was the ARPANET. It was replaced in 1989 by the NSFNet backbone. This was similar to a Tier 1 |- |[[Nippo
Note that they are all headquartered in the USA except for Global Crossing, which is headquartered in Bermuda. Note that Verio is a US-based wholly-owned subsidiary of NTT, which is headquartered in Tokyo, Japan and is partially owned by the Japanese Government.
Due to the marketing considerations mentioned above, many people mistakenly believe that other networks are Tier 1 when they are not. Because of this, many online resources and forums incorrectly list several non-qualifying networks as Tier 1. Below is a list of some of these Tier 2 networks which are often listed as Tier 1, along with their upstream providers: