Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Twitching: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 16:21, 3 October 2007

Twitching

"Twitching" is a verb not a noun, is not a scientific term, and is covered by "fasciculation," "tic," and other articles. Clearly the article is a joke, but even then, "twitching" does not deserve a namespace. Cyborg Ninja 16:10, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Actually it is a noun, but there are other issues. It isn't scientific, and there is an article for twitch as well. - Cyborg Ninja 16:19, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete doesn't deserve an article. ILovePlankton 16:21, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 16:19, 3 October 2007 edit Cyborg Ninja (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 1,193 edits →Twitching ← Previous edit		Revision as of 16:21, 3 October 2007 edit undo ILovePlankton (talk \| contribs) 5,077 edits →Twitching Next edit →
Line 6:		Line 6:

	* '''Comment''' Actually it is a noun, but there are other issues. It isn't scientific, and there is an article for [[twitch]] as well. - [[User:Cyborg Ninja\|Cyborg Ninja]] 16:19, 3 October 2007 (UTC)		* '''Comment''' Actually it is a noun, but there are other issues. It isn't scientific, and there is an article for [[twitch]] as well. - [[User:Cyborg Ninja\|Cyborg Ninja]] 16:19, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
			*'''Delete''' doesn't deserve an article. [[User:ILovePlankton\|ILovePlankton]] 16:21, 3 October 2007 (UTC)