User talk:Ahmedrefat: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 14:37, 9 October 2007

thank you for youe contribution

Meaning of Planet names

I was very happy to find your great lists! Maybe you could help me with some planetary names as my Arabic is too bad. I am working on the planets for Swahili wikipedia. Most planets have Arabic names. I would like to give the meaning of the names but for this both my knowledge and my dictionary is insufficient. Like zuhura obviuosly has to do with "flower, blossoming" but what would be the right expression? I would appreciate very much if you could give an answer here or on my sw:talkpage. --Kipala 08:32, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Zagaziguniversity.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Zagaziguniversity.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:09, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Meaning of Zuhura in Arabic

Thank you very much for your kind message Your article about planets for Swahili wikipedia looks very nice and promosing . We all Wiki hope to see more and more article in Swahili and other non English language…

Regarding your question about the meaning of “ Zuhura”, The Following answer –in my opinion – may help you:

In Arabic language : Zahra (pl Zouhor) refers to flower َزهرة- جمعها: زهور

But our case is: “ Zuh’ra” or “ Az’Zuhrah “ زُهـــره: Refers to

Az’zuhrah ( zuhura) = Early evening and Early morning Star ( Venus )

Az’zuhrah ( zuhura) = Luminous, The Glorious white.

Reference : المنجد في اللغة و الأعلام: الطبعة 33 : دار المشرق لبنان ( 1992 ) ISBN:2-7214-2181-6

نظام شمسي. (2007, أبريل 26). ويكيبيديا, الموسوعة الحرّة. Retrieved 17:28, أبريل 27, 2007 from http://ar.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=%D9%86%D8%B8%D8%A7%D9%85_%D8%B4%D9%85%D8%B3%D9%8A&oldid=697386.

Image tagging for Image:Zaguneng.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Zaguneng.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 20:14, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:ZuMed.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:ZuMed.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:14, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:33zumaher.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:3zumaher.jpg. The copy called Image:3zumaher.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and remember exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 20:02, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Prevalence-incidence bias

Message posted on Thursday, May 24, 2007

Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Prevalence-incidence bias. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites (http://www.dorak.info/epi/bc.html in this case) or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Prevalence-incidence bias with a link to where we can find that note;
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on the article Talk page. Alternatively, you may create a note on your web page releasing the work under the GFDL and then leave a note at Talk:Prevalence-incidence bias with a link to the details.

Otherwise, you are encouraged to rewrite this article in your own words to avoid any copyright infringement. After you do so, you should place a {{hangon}} tag on the article page and leave a note at Talk:Prevalence-incidence bias saying you have done so. An administrator will review the new content before taking action.

It is also important that all Wikipedia articles have an encyclopedic tone and follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

Butseriouslyfolks 02:12, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Family information bias

Message posted on Thursday, May 24, 2007

Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Family information bias. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites (http://www.dorak.info/epi/bc.html in this case) or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Family information bias with a link to where we can find that note;
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on the article Talk page. Alternatively, you may create a note on your web page releasing the work under the GFDL and then leave a note at Talk:Family information bias with a link to the details.

Otherwise, you are encouraged to rewrite this article in your own words to avoid any copyright infringement. After you do so, you should place a {{hangon}} tag on the article page and leave a note at Talk:Family information bias saying you have done so. An administrator will review the new content before taking action.

It is also important that all Wikipedia articles have an encyclopedic tone and follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

Butseriouslyfolks 02:13, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Central Agency for Public Mobilization and Statistics

Message posted on Thursday, May 24, 2007

Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Central Agency for Public Mobilization and Statistics. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites (http://unstats.un.org/unsd/goodprac/bpform.asp?DocId=12&KeyId=24 in this case) or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Central Agency for Public Mobilization and Statistics with a link to where we can find that note;
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on the article Talk page. Alternatively, you may create a note on your web page releasing the work under the GFDL and then leave a note at Talk:Central Agency for Public Mobilization and Statistics with a link to the details.

Otherwise, you are encouraged to rewrite this article in your own words to avoid any copyright infringement. After you do so, you should place a {{hangon}} tag on the article page and leave a note at Talk:Central Agency for Public Mobilization and Statistics saying you have done so. An administrator will review the new content before taking action.

It is also important that all Wikipedia articles have an encyclopedic tone and follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

Butseriouslyfolks 02:28, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation in Bias in medical studies

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Bias in medical studies, by Butseriouslyfolks (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Bias in medical studies is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Bias in medical studies, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 02:48, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation in Berkson bias

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Berkson bias, by Butseriouslyfolks (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Berkson bias is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Berkson bias, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 02:49, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation in Detection bias

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Detection bias, by Butseriouslyfolks (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Detection bias is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Detection bias, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 02:49, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation in End-aversion bias

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on End-aversion bias, by Butseriouslyfolks (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because End-aversion bias is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting End-aversion bias, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 02:49, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation in Overmatching bias

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Overmatching bias, by Butseriouslyfolks (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Overmatching bias is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Overmatching bias, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 02:50, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio of Prevalence-incidence bias

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions to the Prevalence-incidence bias article, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

Feel free to re-submit a new version of the article. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later."

You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here. You can also leave a message on my talk page. AKRadecki 03:23, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do you need some help?

Given the number of warnings about copyright violations that have been posted, and the number of articles that I've had to delete because of it, I thought I'd check in with you and make sure you understand why this is happening. If you have any questions, please drop me a line. AKRadecki 05:25, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of October 6 University

I've nominated October 6 University, an article you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that October 6 University satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion; I have explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/October 6 University and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of October 6 University during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Xiaphias 03:48, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Faculty of Agriculture Zagazig University

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Faculty of Agriculture Zagazig University, by 24.146.29.231 (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Faculty of Agriculture Zagazig University fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

shit article

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Faculty of Agriculture Zagazig University, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it did not nominate Faculty of Agriculture Zagazig University itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 04:41, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of bias in medical literature

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article List of bias in medical literature, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. Thefellswooper 14:37, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 135: / Line 135: @@
 ==[[:Faculty of Agriculture Zagazig University]]==
 [[Image:Information_icon.svg|left]]Hello, this is a message from [[User:Android Mouse Bot 2|an automated bot]]. A tag has been placed on [[:Faculty of Agriculture Zagazig University]], by {{#ifeq:1|1|[[User:24.146.29.231|24.146.29.231]]&nbsp;([[User talk:24.146.29.231|talk]]&nbsp;'''·''' [[Special:Contributions/24.146.29.231|contribs]]),}} another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be [[Wikipedia:Speedy deletions|speedily deleted]] from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because [[:Faculty of Agriculture Zagazig University]] fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason: <br><center>'''shit article'''</center><br>To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting [[:Faculty of Agriculture Zagazig University]], please affix the template <nowiki>{{hangon}}</nowiki> to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at [[WP:WMD]]. '''Please note that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it did not nominate [[:Faculty of Agriculture Zagazig University]] itself.''' Feel free to leave a message on the [[User talk:Android Mouse|bot operator's talk page]] if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --[[User:Android Mouse Bot 2|Android Mouse Bot 2]] 04:41, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
+==List of bias in medical literature==
+[[Image:Circle-style-warning.svg|left|48px|]]
+A {{[[Template:prod|prod]]}} template has been added to the article [[List of bias in medical literature]], suggesting that it be deleted according to the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion]] process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Criteria for inclusion|criteria for inclusion]], and the deletion notice explains why (see also "[[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not|What Wikipedia is not]]" and [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|Wikipedia's deletion policy]]).  You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the <code><nowiki>{{dated prod}}</nowiki></code> notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on [[Talk:List of bias in medical literature|its talk page]]. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the [[WP:PROD|proposed deletion process]], the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion criteria]] or it can be sent to [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|Articles for Deletion]], where it may be deleted if [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{tl|db-author}}. [[User:Thefellswooper|Thefellswooper]] 14:37, 9 October 2007 (UTC)