Talk:The Legendary Pink Dots: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Sure, I will ask my brother to also comment since he was the original bassist :) --[[User:Sjc|Sjc]] 18:07, 18 Mar 2004 (UTC) |
Sure, I will ask my brother to also comment since he was the original bassist :) --[[User:Sjc|Sjc]] 18:07, 18 Mar 2004 (UTC) |
||
---- |
|||
Something might be worth saying about the genre confusion. The comparison to [[Pink Floyd]] is somewhat misleading, but for somewhat hard to define reasons---certainly musically LPD could reasonably be called "psychadelic" at most points in their career, but their general subject matter, circle of acquaintances and collaborators, and fan base, is more in tune with neofolk, industrial, and occasionally goth than with psychadelic music. --[[User:Delirium|Delirium]] 21:25, Jun 13, 2005 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 21:25, 13 June 2005
Probably difficult to merge with the Edward Ka-Spel page since Edward is not only lead singer of the Dots, he is also a fairly well-respected poet in his own right. --Sjc 18:04, 18 Mar 2004 (UTC)
OK - if you know anything about him, can I encourage you to expand his page? Thanks! Mark Richards 18:06, 18 Mar 2004 (UTC)
Sure, I will ask my brother to also comment since he was the original bassist :) --Sjc 18:07, 18 Mar 2004 (UTC)
Something might be worth saying about the genre confusion. The comparison to Pink Floyd is somewhat misleading, but for somewhat hard to define reasons---certainly musically LPD could reasonably be called "psychadelic" at most points in their career, but their general subject matter, circle of acquaintances and collaborators, and fan base, is more in tune with neofolk, industrial, and occasionally goth than with psychadelic music. --Delirium 21:25, Jun 13, 2005 (UTC)