Talk:Nuclear envelope: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m Revert to revision 109152320 dated 2007-02-18 21:43:15 by Tameeria using popups |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:I wouldn't redirect nuclear lamina to nuclear envelope, based on the fact that only the animal nuclear envelope has a true nuclear lamina. Also, this article is completely missing information on the plant nuclear envelope, e.g. its role as MTOC in mitosis. - [[User:Tameeria|tameeria]] 01:39, 10 February 2007 (UTC) |
:I wouldn't redirect nuclear lamina to nuclear envelope, based on the fact that only the animal nuclear envelope has a true nuclear lamina. Also, this article is completely missing information on the plant nuclear envelope, e.g. its role as MTOC in mitosis. - [[User:Tameeria|tameeria]] 01:39, 10 February 2007 (UTC) |
||
In my school, the textbook calls it "the nuclear membrane," so I was thinking if we should change it. [[User:yctaabpjic]] 10:40 10 October |
|||
Revision as of 05:39, 11 October 2007
Template:Wikiproject MCB I moved part of the paragraph on the nuclear lamina to the actual nuclear lamina article. There's also the possibility of redirecting the nuclear lamina article to this one...--Kinglz 21:21, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- I wouldn't redirect nuclear lamina to nuclear envelope, based on the fact that only the animal nuclear envelope has a true nuclear lamina. Also, this article is completely missing information on the plant nuclear envelope, e.g. its role as MTOC in mitosis. - tameeria 01:39, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
In my school, the textbook calls it "the nuclear membrane," so I was thinking if we should change it. User:yctaabpjic 10:40 10 October