Talk:Arnica montana: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 16:42, 14 October 2007

Plants Unassessed

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This page says Arnica montana is also known as wolf's bane. The Wolfsbane page redirects to Aconitum and that page makes no reference to Arnica montana.

Suggestions: (1) remove the reference here to wolf's bane, if it isn't really right, or (2) if Aconitum is going to remain the wolfsbane page, add a note to it indicating other plants that are also known as wolfsbane, or (3) create a separate wolfsbane page that lists all the plants that are commonly called wolfsbane.

Well, #1 would not be right. There are numerous references to Arnica Montana as also known as Wolf's bane. #2 doesn't seem right either. Why should one be redirected to a page that says that there are other plants also known as..., #3 is a reasonable idea, but another would be to have a Wolfsbane disambiguation page. Both plants seem to be about equally referenced as also known as..., and this old source from 1911 has the name for both of them http://www.henriettesherbal.com/eclectic/usdisp/index.html--Alfrodull 16:25, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Instead of any of those, I changed the link on this page for wolf's bane from the redirect to Aconitum to the Wolfsbane disambiguation page instead.Alfrodull 23:15, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Arnica?

There's also a WP page for Arnica - perhaps the two should be merged? Daniel Barlow 22:37, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why? --EncycloPetey 16:42, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 23:15, 5 July 2007 edit Alfrodull (talk \| contribs) 204 edits No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 16:42, 14 October 2007 edit undo EncycloPetey (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 32,447 edits →Merge with Arnica? Next edit →
Line 12:		Line 12:

	There's also a WP page for [[Arnica]] - perhaps the two should be merged? [[User:Daniel Barlow\|Daniel Barlow]] 22:37, 22 August 2006 (UTC)		There's also a WP page for [[Arnica]] - perhaps the two should be merged? [[User:Daniel Barlow\|Daniel Barlow]] 22:37, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
			:Why? --[[User:EncycloPetey\|EncycloPetey]] 16:42, 14 October 2007 (UTC)