Talk:Cristina Fernández de Kirchner

Failure to adress more controversial issues

Cristina Fernández de Kirchner has been criticized for being a sort of embassador to the country(something the article states), which is seen as not acceptable (due to time constraints) for someone who already holds the office of senator.

She has also been criticized for being superflous and even of neglecting her duties.An example being the time when she was seen(and photographed) in DISNEY WORLD with her daughter and a friend of her daughter during debates in the Senate over the budget) Those particular pictures also gained her a quite unpopular image (albeit only for a few weeks) in the left wing (of which she proclaims herself a militant) because she was in a place normally identified with big corporations and american imperialism

Also, the only polls that show her as a clear favorite for the presidency are goverment founded ones(her husbands pupularity ,however , is undisputed)

In short i belve a sign should be placed stating that the article is generally biased.

Please forgive my poor english,it is not my native tongue — Preceding unsigned comment added by Viridio (talk • contribs)

About her studies

There is a text that says as follows: "Although it is claimed that she is a lawyer, details about whether she graduated or not are unknown and her academic records have not been released by the school". A similar text was placed in the spanish article, and proved as vandalism, or something even worse. For the ones who do not speak spanish, I will explain again the reasons.

The controversial text provides a reference, this site. Providing references is crucial when adding such information. The problem is that the reference is a lie: the article does not say what it is refereced it would say. It does not state about her graduation being unknown or her records not being released. It suggest the idea, employing speculation, circunstancial evidence, faulty logic, conditional syntax; but it carefully keeps from making any clear statement that would send them to justice because of defamation. In fact, it does quite the opposite, and does state a disclaimer about them just speculating and not formally accusing her of not having a degree, wich makes the whole article pointless as a source of information for Wikipedia.

Cristina Fernandez having a degree, on the other hand, can be referenced with her profile at the Senate of Argentina itself.

Besides, this portal is not a reliable source. It must be noted that none of the mainstream media of Argentina, either for, against or neutral towards Kirchner, have given room to any of this speculations. It is entirely an issue raised by a semi-unknown internet site. 190.30.21.5 15:18, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Citing Spanish Wikipedia

Footnote #3 mentions a controversy about her legal credentials which is taking place at the Spanish Wikipedia. Is this appropriate to mention in a footnote? --Gelsomina 14:59, 16 October 2007 (UTC)