I'm Not Sorry.net: Difference between revisions
m →Reaction: Copyedit. |
MandalayVA (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
==External links== |
==External links== |
||
*[http://www.imnotsorry.net I'm Not Sorry.net] |
*[http://www.imnotsorry.net I'm Not Sorry.net] |
||
*[ |
*[http://imnotsorrydotnet.blogspot.com/ I'm Not Sorry's blog] |
||
[[Category:Abortion in media]] |
[[Category:Abortion in media]] |
||
Revision as of 10:59, 17 October 2007
An editor has nominated this article for deletion. You are welcome to participate in the deletion discussion, which will decide whether or not to retain it. |
I’m Not Sorry.net is a Web site that collects stories concerning women’s positive abortion experiences. The site went online on January 29, 2003 and as of October 2007 contains over 600 stories.
History
I'm Not Sorry.net was created in January 2003 by Patricia Beninato, a customer service representative from Richmond, Virginia,[1][2][3] who stated that she got the idea while participating in a chat room discussion on the 30th anniversary of Roe v. Wade. The hesitancy to openly talk about abortion in a positive context during the chat session suggested to Beninato that members of the pro-choice movement were tacitly agreeing with pro-lifers that abortion is a damaging experience for all women.[4]
After searching the Internet for post-abortion accounts, and finding only pro-life services which offered regret counselling, Beninato decided to set up a web site on which women who felt satisfied with their abortion decisions could share their stories.[2] On January 29, 2003, a week after the online discussion that served as motivation, I'm Not Sorry.net was launched.[4]
Beninato initially solicited stories on an Internet forum, but, after a few months, began receiving regular submissions as awareness of the site spread via word of mouth.[4] She has gathered and published stories from over 600 women as of October 2007.[5]
Site features
In addition to the personal accounts, I’m Not Sorry features a FAQ section, which seeks to answer a number of questions that have been posed by pro-life visitors.[6] In April 2005, Beninato created a companion blog for the site, in which she addresses various pro-choice issues and sheds light on the workings of the site.[7]
The site’s publicity comes primarily from word-of-mouth, blog mentions and clinic referrals, as Beninato does not accept advertising either on the site or the blog.[8] There are rumors that a collection of stories from the site may be published as a book, as Beninato, who had originally said that she felt the accounts were more powerful online, recently edited the "About INS" page of the I'm Not Sorry web site to state that a book was "an idea that's been broached to me a few times".[8]
Beninato has stated that the story of her own abortion is among those included on I'm Not Sorry.net, but that it is listed under a pseudonym, as she did not wish for people visiting the site to focus exclusively on her own experience.[8]
Reaction
I'm Not Sorry.net has received attention in the media, as Beninato made a television appearance on the CBC newsmagazine The National, and has given interviews to several publications like The Nation.[2][3]
I'm Not Sorry.net has sparked debate and reactions from commentators have ranged from supportive, to opposing, to simply expressing reservations over a particular aspect of the site's purpose or implementation. Laura Barcella, writing for Salon.com in 2004, noted I'm Not Sorry.net as one of several projects which have allowed women to "frankly describe their abortions" and observed that the site "appears to be a reflection of the classic feminist credo 'abortion on demand, without apology'".[9] Lynn Vincent, who interviewed Beninato for World magazine in 2005, questioned whether the site's policy of accepting anonymous submissions contradicted its stated goal of removing the secrecy often associated with abortion.[10] The political writer Judith Warner stated in an editoral published on her New York Times-hosted blog, Domestic Disturbances, in 2006 that she did not think a site like I'm Not Sorry.net was "the best way to cement widespread support for a beleaguered movement", as she was uncertain whether it was reasonable to "[take] a strident, casual, even callous tone on [an] issue" that is often very emotionally-charged.[11] An article printed in a 2004 edition of The Caleb Report, a publication of the pro-life organization Life Decisions International, criticized the "ImNotSorry crowd" as "ignorant of the facts and grossly misguided". [12]
See also
References
- ^ LaFay, Laura. (n.d.). "The Long Fight." Style Weekly. Retrieved October 15, 2007.
- ^ a b c Baumgardner, Jennifer. (February 2, 2004). "We're Not Sorry, Charlie." The Nation. Retrieved October 15, 2006.
- ^ a b Pollitt, Katha. (April 21, 2003). "In The Waiting Room." The Nation. Retrieved October 16, 2007.
- ^ a b c Bader, Eleanor J. (July 21, 2003). "Moving on Just Fine." In These Times. Retrieved October 15, 2007.
- ^ "Our Stories." (n.d.). I'mNotSorry.Net. Retrieved October 16, 2007.
- ^ "INS Answers the 'Pro-Lifers'." (n.d.). I'mNotSorry.net. Retrieved October 16, 2007.
- ^ "I'mNotSorry.net blog." (n.d.). I'mNotSorry.net. Retrieved October 16, 2007.
- ^ a b c "About INS." (n.d.). I'mNotSorry.Net. Retrieved October 16, 2007.
- ^ Barcella, Laura. (September 20, 2004). "The A-word." Salon.com. Retrieved October 17, 2007.
- ^ Vincent, Lynn. (April 09, 2005). "Victims of their own choice." World. Retrieved October 16, 2007.
- ^ Warner, Judith. (November 16, 2006). "Battles of Choice." Domestic Disturbances. Retrieved October 16, 2007.
- ^ Life Decisions International. (2004). “I'm Not Sorry." The Caleb Report, 12 (5), 3-5. Retrieved October 16, 2007.