User talk:Vampire Warrior

I'm on Wikibreak until further notice.

hey

Yep I agree with you, he shouldn't make us seem like the bad guys. He the idiot that made a big deal out of it —Preceding unsigned comment added by Summerluvin (talk • contribs) 16:09, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

And look at this, I'm blocked for a week. I sent an email to Elkman and Maxim telling them to smarten up and apparently it's a "threat". How gay is this? I'm thinking of quitting Wikipedia now if they're gonna let Bushcarrot run wild. Tyler Warren ^{(talk/contribs)} 00:43, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

False Accusations

I was falsely accused of harassing administrators. That is a lie. I simply stated Bushcarrot should be banned as well for what he did and said, but all he got was a measly 3 hour ban and I got a week.

Trolling is also false. I do believe when I'm EXPLAINING MYSELF, it's not considered "trolling".

Threatening emails - This I had a good laugh at because there was nothing threatening about the emails. All I stated was that the admins need to learn to do their job properly instead of banning whoever disagrees with them.

Arguing with whomever I disagreed with - False. I only argued with Elkman because he would not pull his fingers out of his ears and listen to the truth, even when Summerluvin posted above, I doubt he even noticed. Bushcarrot got away with harassing myself and Summerluvin and that just goes to show how communist this Wikipedia is. Hence why I'm taking a loooonngggg wikibreak until Elkman gets the nice roundhouse kick to the skull he so sorely needs and comes to his senses and apologizes to me, and Maxim needs to apologize for calling me a WP:DICK. That was un-needed and I felt that to be harassing. Tyler Warren ^{(talk/contribs)} 03:22, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

Since you're apparently still looking for an explanation

Since you're still going on about this, let me explain a few things here. Please read Wikipedia:Blocking policy before going on. Basically, most of the cases there say that users may be blocked if their behavior persistently disrupts the project. (And here's the project: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is an encyclopedia.)

Bushcarrot (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) is not "running wild". He improperly flagged Summerluvin (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) as a sockpuppet; see Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/EndoExo for the details. Once the truth of the situation was known, Bushcarrot closed the investigation and apologized to Summerluvin. Later (after some provocation), he made this attack at your user talk page. There was also this angry message. You made this report at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. I did a quick investigation to see if Bushcarrot's activities were disruptive, and seeing that he was making personal attacks and reverted your posts at AIV, I blocked him for three hours. That all happened on October 8, last Monday. That was almost a week ago. I gave Bushcarrot some advice on the 10th (Wednesday). Basically, I told him to stay cool when the situation got hot and that he shouldn't resort to personal attacks and shouldn't revert reports at WP:AIV, which he acknowledged. Since then, he hasn't made any substantial edits, other than a repeated apology to Summerluvin, an apology/attempt to make amends to Polarwolf, and reported a page that was a non-notable biography, which I've since deleted under Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion A7. He also dropped out of The Transhumanist's virtual classroom. Right now, on October 14 (Sunday), he isn't doing anything that I can block him for. He isn't vandalizing, isn't making personal attacks, and isn't disrupting the encyclopedia. Thus, I can't block him, I won't block him, and I don't want to block him.

I'm going to take a break and mention again that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. In other words, this project exists so we can write encyclopedia articles that teach people things. For example, the article History of Minnesota is intended to give people a broad overview of the history of the state, beginning with the Ojibwe and Dakota Indians who lived here, continuing with European territorial acquisition and the foundation of Fort Snelling, the building of sawmills and flour mills at St. Anthony Falls, the emergence of the iron mining industry, and the progression to the modern era of the state being a center of technology and artistic merit. It has been identified as a featured article, and I'm quite happy with it.

As far as your own behavior goes: I don't really want to go back forever and ever into your contributions, but this angry message] to Bmg916 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) on September 28, as well as this message on a user subpage, and this warning earned you your first block. Between your first block and October 8, your only substantial edit to mainspace was this edit to Food Basics (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). On October 8, you warned Bushcarrot about personal attacks, then immediately reported him at WP:AIV. (By the way, AIV says: "The vandal is active now, has been sufficiently warned, and has vandalized after a recent last warning, except in unusual circumstances.") After I blocked Bushcarrot, you did this victory dance midafternoon on October 8, pledged that you wouldn't mediate with Bushcarrot on the morning of October 9, and told Summerluvin that you would refuse mediation later that morning.

I gave you this message encouraging you not to taunt Bushcarrot, and I also mentioned what I saw when I checked over your last 100 edits. You told me here that your last 100 edits were none of my business. (By the way, that's incorrect. Anyone can review an editor's contribution history. Your edits reflect your record and reputation as a Wikipedian.) Not only that, but your message included: Just remember.....there's nowhere to run to when death becomes you. I asked you if that was a death threat, and you said, "Nah homie, it's 50 cent, yo. "When Death Becomes You". Lmmfao. Get with the times homie, and seriously, get off mah back. I'm off to have a smoke and chill now." I had to look up that it was indeed a song by 50 Cent. Regardless, there's no real good reason to use song lyrics about death on an admin's page. You also defended your message when SQL (talk · contribs) asked you about it.

You got blocked again midafternoon on October 9, after I asked other admins for their opinion at WP:AN/I. I didn't even block you. I was considering it, and I wanted to do it, but I felt I was too close to the situation. You got a 72-hour block, which you protested because not everyone knows lyrics by 50 Cent. (I do know that his name rhymes with FDDI, at least.) And you continued to use your talk page to yell at me and insist that Bushcarrot be blocked for a longer time despite the fact that your behavior was clearly being more disruptive than his was. I told you that you weren't going to have any discussion with me and protected your talk page for the duration of your block.

In the meantime, you apparently harassed Maxim (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) via e-mail, and I know you sent me two e-mails as well, which I promptly ignored. That got your block extended to a week with e-mail disabled.

The protection on your talk page expired this morning, at which Summerluvin (talk · contribs) posted, "Yep I agree with you, he shouldn't make us seem like the bad guys. He the idiot that made a big deal out of it" Was she referring to me or Bushcarrot? You replied saying that you were thinking of quitting Wikipedia altogether.

And now you say that I need a nice roundhouse kick to the skull. Are you seriously telling me that that isn't a personal attack? Are you seriously claiming that you're the "good guy" in this case, and that every one of your edits since October 8 has been completely legitimate while Bushcarrot still needs to be blocked, for something he did nearly a week ago?

I would have encouraged you to find some articles to work on after your block expires, in the hopes that maybe you'd become a positive contributor. As far as I can tell, you seem to have an interest in pro wrestling. But when I looked at your contributions to actual Wikipedia articles (not user pages, user talk page, or Wikipedia special pages), I found you have only 31 edits in the mainspace. Frankly, I'm not sure what you would be working on.

If you think I need "a roundhouse kick to the skull", there's no chance that I'm going to apologize to you. This is a matter of your own personal conduct, not anyone else's. Just in case, though, I'm going to ask some other admins if I truly need a roundhouse kick to the skull. --Elkman ^(Elkspeak) 03:43, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

Actually, I'm going to request right now that you retract the "roundhouse to the skull" comment and start contributing positively to Wikipedia. -- Flyguy649 ^talk 03:52, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

-chortle- First off I didn't do a victory dance. Read what I said. I said I would but "I'm not THAT vain.". Also, since when has it become a crime to mainly work on a persons userpage? I've been trying to finish it off before I contribute majorly, thank you very much. As for Bushcarrot, I don't care about him anymore, so long as he doesn't get in my face again like he did above. As for Bmg916, me and him have already worked things out, so drop it. I'm on my Wikibreak. Leave me alone. That's all I have to say, nothing else. Tyler Warren ^{(talk/contribs)} 06:31, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

Edit: Almost forgot, Summerluvin was talking about Bushcarrot, but leave her out of this. This is between myself and you guys. Calling me a WP:DICK; Not needed. Saying I was arguing with everyone I disagreed with; A lie. I only argued with people who got on my nerves and pissed me off (Bush + Elk) Bye. Wikibreak now. Tyler Warren ^{(talk/contribs)} 06:38, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

Edit 2: Oooh no! Don't want to piss off the admins =O. Frig. Well, seeing as you guys apparently think you're better than everyone else because of the ability to click the word "Block" (ooh, how powerful), I might as well painstakingly say this......grr....I....I retract my roundhouse comment.....*leaves to have a smoke*Tyler Warren ^{(talk/contribs)} 06:33, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

Too late. You said it, you must have meant it, and you can't take it back now. --Elkman ^(Elkspeak) 13:49, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

No, too late for you. Flyguy told me to retract it, I did, so too damn bad for you. Tyler Warren ^{(talk/contribs)} 21:34, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

You must have thought I was deserving of a roundhouse kick to the skull or you wouldn't have said that in the first place, right? --Elkman ^(Elkspeak) 22:01, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

←Tyler, thanks for retracting the comment. You should also strike the comment using <s> and </s> tags surrounding the original comment or remove it outright. You can leave a note stating that the comment has been refactored. Regards, -- Flyguy649 ^talk 06:42, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

Hello! The Pro Wrestling Collaboration of the Week for October 14 - October 20 is N/A. Please help to improve it to match the quality of an ideal Wikipedia professional wrestling related article. The next article for collaboration will be chosen on Sunday, October 21. Cast your vote to select the collaboration for next week! | Nominate an article that could be greatly improved! You are receiving this notification because you are listed as a member of the Professional Wrestling WikiProject. If you no longer wish to receive this notice, then please add your name to this list.

Update

I'm still pissed off about what went down, but I'm putting it behind me. I don't want to hear from Elkman or Bushcarrot. That's all I'm asking for. Tyler Warren ^{(talk/contribs)} 23:31, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Creating Stubs

Hello! When creating stubs, please remember to sort them.

eg: Instead of adding {{stub}} add {{wrestler-stub}}.

Keep up the good work! Domthedude001 02:44, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

yo

You might want to, ya know, stop adding comments to me, and get a life. TTYL Tyler! —Preceding unsigned comment added by ThisDude62 (talk • contribs) 05:28, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

???

Calm down Tyler maybe you just need some love brother :-* ThisDude62 05:36, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

Love Part Deuce

well, whatever floats your boat my friend if cyber is what you like but I prefer my girls on the same continent as me.

ThisDude62 05:45, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

Good News

I have good news! The article Talia Madison was unprotected and has been replaced with a redirect page to her article under her real name. Thanks for the concern, Tyler, and if you have any future questions or concerns you can contact me on AIM at ThisDude62. ThisDude62 05:56, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

...

Tyler, I know she's in England, but don't lie about it. She still lives in Newcastle, which is where she has lived for most of her life. Its ok, man, long distance is where its at these days...but still, I prefer all of my girls to live on the same continent as me, hell, at least in the same country, but every girl I've been with is in the same county. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ThisDude62 (talk • contribs) 06:08, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

Dude, she might not be in Newcastle right now, but both you know and I know she has lived there. ThisDude62 06:13, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

I am ThisDude62. hey, you messaged me first, buddy.

My name name is John. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ThisDude62 (talk • contribs) 06:18, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

Here's a big hint...I'm not the guy who is harassing you on your blogs. I didn't know about you until you started referring to me as "smartass" and instructing me to remove something from my user page that, from the looks of it, is remaining. Also, claiming I'm going to be "banned so fast my head spins". You brought me knowing upon yourself, buddy. I'm just an anonymous Wikipedia user. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ThisDude62 (talk • contribs) 06:23, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

OK, Tyler, to make you feel better, I know about her because of the comments on your MySpace site. Someone mentioned "marrying you" (which the whole situation is kinda pathetic) if you ask me, I clicked on her site, and it was her. You can go to sleep at night now, Tyler. I live in Georgia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ThisDude62 (talk • contribs) 06:28, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

Yeah man well good luck with that Tyler but don't be a dick to people on here because there are some people on here who will go all out and will do more than mess with your head. There's a line between doing a job, and being a dick, you have to learn how to turn the other cheek. But for me, girls wise, I'm in a fraternity and we do a lot of stuff with a sorority so...you know what goes on at these parties haha but maybe if I find the right girl, here...I can't have the same feelings if I can't hold them in my arms. But good luck with yours. ThisDude62 06:34, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

Talia

How do you like the picture I have up of Talia man, I contacted her on MySpace and we're in a conversation right now about beer pong haha, but she said she's going to provide factual information for the article, she wants to help out on her article herself, as well as provide some help on the article for her boyfriend, Sugar Shane Helms. ThisDude62 07:06, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

Re: Deletion Of Talia Madison

This was a procedural deletion. If you think there's merit for an article on Madison, please add a discussion to WP:DRV. I don't really care either way. Cheers, ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 10:53, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

No Way Out

I find myself being wary. I am on permanent 1RR, so I can't revert an article more than once per 24 hours unless it is clear vandalism or against consensus. A couple of admins cautioned me to just get someone else to do it if I have any doubts. TJ Spyke 02:02, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

No Way out

I wonder what your problem is ! You know what, may be if you have asked me politely not to write in your article if it's yours, i would have listened to you but with calling me a "vandal" i guess not. I wonder about all this talk of "expressing yourself" and being banned and stuff.You Know something, this article, what the hell, i'll start my article about the whole thing and i dare you delete it. I know about all the keyfabes and crape but some stuff are real and if you wanna write something the write it right. Keep watching my edits hero. I'll show you vandal " whats wrong with wikipedia " you or me. You seem to have psychological problems dealing with others... —Preceding unsigned comment added by TomJBlane (talk • contribs) 02:40, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

No Way Out

Simply, i'll not write the same article with the same name ofcourse. It's gonna be much different with all the references needed. Come on, who you think you are dealing with, a kid ! You are right, i cannot write in someone else's article and NOBODY will "explain himself" in my own. —Preceding unsigned comment added by TomJBlane (talk • contribs) 02:58, 20 October 2007 (UTC) Well, I WILL NOT fill it or any other article with my opinion and i didn't do that before. You don't seem to get it. I'll just tell the story of what happened before, during and after this feud and some others. NO PERSONAL OPINIONS. I'm warning you, don't you dare warn me. Guess what, my article with a totally different name is on wikipedia now, so what about your warnings!?