Talk:Interstate 275 (Ohio–Indiana–Kentucky): Difference between revisions
m Signing comment by 65.189.25.132 - "→Actually 2nd largest?: new section" |
m WP:USRD/A tagging update |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{U.S. Interstate Highway WikiProject|class=Stub| |
{{U.S. Interstate Highway WikiProject|class=Stub|needs-map=yes|importance=High}} |
||
{{WikiProject Indiana|class=Stub}} |
{{WikiProject Indiana|class=Stub}} |
||
Revision as of 01:36, 21 October 2007
Template:U.S. Interstate Highway WikiProject
Indiana Stub‑class | |||||||||||||||
|
Time Zone Sentence Incorrect
The introduction to this entry has false information in it. Dearborn County, like four other Indiana counties near Cincinnati have adjusted their clocks like the rest of the Cincinnati Metropolitian Area. As such, you would not be changing you clocks when you entered Dearborn County. The sentence stating that you would need to set your clock twice during the summer is false, and as such I propose that it should be deleted. Previously I tried to delete this sentence, but it since has been changed back. TraderJake 01:41, 28 January 2006 (UTC)TraderJake
- OK, now I'm taking it on faith that you know what you're talking about, and if you had bothered to explain, instead of just deleting it, it would have stayed deleted!!! Wahkeenah 02:05, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
- I apologize, I am new to this, and I should have researched a bit more before changing it. So that you do not have to take my word on faith, here is a link explaining the time zones in Indiana: http://www.mccsc.edu/time.html#WHAT--TraderJake 22:42, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
- 10-Roger. We gone. Bye-bye. :) Wahkeenah 01:18, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
- I apologize, I am new to this, and I should have researched a bit more before changing it. So that you do not have to take my word on faith, here is a link explaining the time zones in Indiana: http://www.mccsc.edu/time.html#WHAT--TraderJake 22:42, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
Actually 2nd largest?
In checking on the M25 loop in London, the wikipedia article [1] says that it is not actually a continuous loop. Wouldn't that make 275 the second longest continuous loop? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.189.25.132 (talk) 19:17, 21 September 2007 (UTC)