Talk:Dotfuscator: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Not just the reader, but [[WP:NPOV]] and [[WP:ADVERT]] arguably come into play. It needs to be improved. At the very least, the contested claims need to be surrounded by language making it clear that they are the manufacturer's assertions, not objective, universally agree-on facts. And the or else is that the page could be AfD'ed. [[User:66.32.67.203|66.32.67.203]] 17:48, 22 July 2007 (UTC) |
Not just the reader, but [[WP:NPOV]] and [[WP:ADVERT]] arguably come into play. It needs to be improved. At the very least, the contested claims need to be surrounded by language making it clear that they are the manufacturer's assertions, not objective, universally agree-on facts. And the or else is that the page could be AfD'ed. [[User:66.32.67.203|66.32.67.203]] 17:48, 22 July 2007 (UTC) |
||
I updated the page, I believe it's NPOV enough to remove the advert block, more updates to come at a later time. [[User:MLetterle|MLetterle]] 23:53, 22 October 2007 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 23:53, 22 October 2007
Superior protection? That is biased right there. I demand that phrase be replaced and competing products be listed somewhere on this page. 68.236.176.23 17:34, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
The reader demands it! We should probably do it then! OR ELSE! 148.70.194.2 15:54, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
Not just the reader, but WP:NPOV and WP:ADVERT arguably come into play. It needs to be improved. At the very least, the contested claims need to be surrounded by language making it clear that they are the manufacturer's assertions, not objective, universally agree-on facts. And the or else is that the page could be AfD'ed. 66.32.67.203 17:48, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
I updated the page, I believe it's NPOV enough to remove the advert block, more updates to come at a later time. MLetterle 23:53, 22 October 2007 (UTC)