Grid energy storage: Difference between revisions
Skier Dude (talk | contribs) portalizing template using AWB |
|||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
''Main article: [[Pumped-storage hydroelectricity]]'' |
''Main article: [[Pumped-storage hydroelectricity]]'' |
||
In many places, pumped storage hydroelectricity is used to even out the daily generating load, by pumping water to a high storage reservoir during off-peak hours and weekends, using the excess base-load capacity from coal or nuclear sources. During peak hours, this water can be used for [[hydroelectric]] generation, often as a high value rapid-response reserve to cover transient peaks in demand. There is over 90 GW of pumped storage in operation, which is about 3% of global generation capacity. Pumped storage recovers about 75% of the energy consumed, and is currently the most cost effective form of mass power storage. |
In many places, pumped storage hydroelectricity is used to even out the daily generating load, by pumping water to a high storage reservoir during off-peak hours and weekends, using the excess base-load capacity from coal or nuclear sources. During peak hours, this water can be used for [[hydroelectric]] generation, often as a high value rapid-response reserve to cover transient peaks in demand. There is over 90 GW of pumped storage in operation, which is about 3% of short-term global generation capacity. Pumped storage recovers about 75% of the energy consumed, and is currently the most cost effective form of mass power storage. |
||
One of the problems with pumped storage systems is that they usually require two nearby reservoirs at considerably different heights, and this often requires considerable capital expenditure. The system also requires mountainous terrain and many countries have insufficient geographical locations that can house such systems, and those they do have are normally situated in environmentally protected regions. This is why the [[Dinorwig power station|Dinorwig]] pumped storage system in the UK proved so costly to build.<ref>[http://www.doc.ic.ac.uk/~matti/ise2grp/energystorage_report/node6.html]</ref> Traditional hydroelectric dam configurations are far more common than pumped storage; in this configuration, release is delayed until needed. The net effect is the same as pumped storage, but without the round-trip efficiency loss. Additionally a new concept in pumped-storage is utilizing [[wind energy]] to pump water. [[Wind turbine]]s that direct drive water pumps for an 'energy storing wind dam' can make this a more efficient process. |
|||
The primary problem with using pumped storage systems to back up wind power outages, is that they are limited in total capacity. The [[Dinorwig power station|Dinorwig]] pumped storage system in the UK, for instance, is one of the largest installations in the world. However, it can only provide 5% of UK power generation (2.9 gw) for up to 5 hours before it runs out of water (total capacity of the power station is 14.5 [[Watt-hour|gwh]]). However, wind power generation systems can go off-line for days at a time. A large [[anticyclone]] will reduce [[anticyclone|wind]] speeds, and therefore reduce wind power generation to minimum levels across a wide region. For example, meteorological reports for Newport Rhode Island, a typical coastal site favoured for wind generation, show that in the month of September 2006 the wind rarely got above 4 kts (5 mph),<ref>[http://www.newportriweather.com/mwd/stats/sep/sepdtdwind.htm]</ref> whereas a typical wind generator requires at least 15 kts (8m/s or 18 mph) to start generating significant amounts of power.<ref>[http://www.windpower.org/en/tour/wres/pwr.htm]</ref> Thus any proposed energy storage system would have to cope with wind generation systems going off-line for a number of days, or even weeks. A pumped-water power storage system that could cope with that amount of energy storage is inconceivable. If the UK was entirely dependent on wind power, a wind outage lasting just two days would require 140 storage stations with the same generating capacity as Dinorwig to maintain normal power supplies (assuming average UK demand of 1,000 gwh/day).<ref>[http://www.cslforum.org/uk.htm]</ref> |
|||
===Batteries === |
===Batteries === |
Revision as of 10:22, 27 October 2007
Grid energy storage lets electric energy producers send excess electricity over the electricity transmission grid to temporary electricity storage sites that become energy producers when electricity demand is greater, optimizing the production by storing off-peak power for use during peak times. Also, photovoltaic and wind turbine users can avoid the necessity of having battery storage by connecting to the grid, which effectively becomes a giant battery. Photovoltaic operations can store electricity for night time use, and wind power can be stored for calm times.
Grid energy storage is closely related to distributed generation. For distributed generation to function correctly, specialized technical and economic arrangements (such as net metering and vehicle-to-grid power systems) may be needed, and often require regulatory support.
Example
A large expensive nuclear or coal plant can optimally run at full power 24/7, including overnight when businesses and households need about half their daily electricity maximum. The cheap nightly electricity on the grid is used by a pumped-storage hydroelectric power plant to push water hundreds of feet uphill from a lower storage lake to an upper storage lake, effectively storing the electricity as higher elevation water. When electricity demand begins peaking in the afternoon and whenever rapid supply adjustments are needed, the pumped water storage power plant becomes an electricity producer by sending water downhill from the upper to lower lakes through a turbine that generates electricity.
Forms
Pumped water
Main article: Pumped-storage hydroelectricity
In many places, pumped storage hydroelectricity is used to even out the daily generating load, by pumping water to a high storage reservoir during off-peak hours and weekends, using the excess base-load capacity from coal or nuclear sources. During peak hours, this water can be used for hydroelectric generation, often as a high value rapid-response reserve to cover transient peaks in demand. There is over 90 GW of pumped storage in operation, which is about 3% of short-term global generation capacity. Pumped storage recovers about 75% of the energy consumed, and is currently the most cost effective form of mass power storage.
One of the problems with pumped storage systems is that they usually require two nearby reservoirs at considerably different heights, and this often requires considerable capital expenditure. The system also requires mountainous terrain and many countries have insufficient geographical locations that can house such systems, and those they do have are normally situated in environmentally protected regions. This is why the Dinorwig pumped storage system in the UK proved so costly to build.[1] Traditional hydroelectric dam configurations are far more common than pumped storage; in this configuration, release is delayed until needed. The net effect is the same as pumped storage, but without the round-trip efficiency loss. Additionally a new concept in pumped-storage is utilizing wind energy to pump water. Wind turbines that direct drive water pumps for an 'energy storing wind dam' can make this a more efficient process.
The primary problem with using pumped storage systems to back up wind power outages, is that they are limited in total capacity. The Dinorwig pumped storage system in the UK, for instance, is one of the largest installations in the world. However, it can only provide 5% of UK power generation (2.9 gw) for up to 5 hours before it runs out of water (total capacity of the power station is 14.5 gwh). However, wind power generation systems can go off-line for days at a time. A large anticyclone will reduce wind speeds, and therefore reduce wind power generation to minimum levels across a wide region. For example, meteorological reports for Newport Rhode Island, a typical coastal site favoured for wind generation, show that in the month of September 2006 the wind rarely got above 4 kts (5 mph),[2] whereas a typical wind generator requires at least 15 kts (8m/s or 18 mph) to start generating significant amounts of power.[3] Thus any proposed energy storage system would have to cope with wind generation systems going off-line for a number of days, or even weeks. A pumped-water power storage system that could cope with that amount of energy storage is inconceivable. If the UK was entirely dependent on wind power, a wind outage lasting just two days would require 140 storage stations with the same generating capacity as Dinorwig to maintain normal power supplies (assuming average UK demand of 1,000 gwh/day).[4]
Batteries
Battery storage was used in the very early days of electric power networks, but is appearing again. Many "off-the-grid" domestic systems rely on battery storage, as well as most telephone systems, but means of storing large amounts of electricity as such in giant batteries or by other electrical means have not yet been put to general use. Batteries are generally expensive, have maintenance problems, and have limited lifespans. One possible technology for large-scale storage are large-scale flow batteries. Sodium-sulfur batteries could also be inexpensive to implement on a large scale and have been used for grid storage in Japan and in the United States[5]. Vanadium redox batteries and other types of flow batteries are also beginning to be used for energy storage including the averaging of generation from wind turbines. Battery storage has relatively high efficiency, as high as 90% or better.
Now when plug-in hybrid are going to be mass-produced [5] such mobile energy sinks can be utilized for their energy storage capabilities. Vehicle-to-grid technology can be employed, turning each vehicle with its 20 to 50 kWh battery pack into a distributed load-balancing device or emergency power source. This represents 2 to 5 days per vehicle of average household requirements of 10 kWh per day, assuming annual consumption of 3650 kWh. This quantity of energy is equivalent to between 40 and 300 miles of range in such vehicles consuming 0.5 to 0.16 kWh per mile. These figures can be achieved even in home-made electric vehicle conversions. Electric utilities plans to use old plug-in vehicle batteries (sometimes resulting in a giant battery) to store electricity [6] [7]
Compressed air
Main article: Compressed air energy storage
Another grid energy storage method is to use off-peak electricity to compress air, which is usually stored in an old mine or some other kind of geological feature. When electricity demand is high, the compressed air is heated with a small amount of natural gas and then goes through expanders to generate electricity.
Thermal
Main article: Thermal energy storage
Off-peak electricity can be used to make ice from water, and the ice can be stored until the next day, when it is used to cool either the air in a large building, thereby shifting that demand off-peak, or the intake air of a gas turbine generator, thereby increasing the on-peak generation capacity.
Flywheel
Main article: Flywheel energy storage
Mechanical inertia is the basis of this storage method. A heavy rotating disc is accelerated by an electric motor, which acts as a generator on reversal, slowing down the disc and producing electricity. Electricity is stored as the kinetic energy of the disc. Friction must be kept to a minimum to prolong the storage time. This is often achieved by placing the flywheel in a vacuum and using magnetic bearings, tending to make the method expensive. Larger flywheel speeds allow greater storage capacity but require strong materials such as steel or composite materials to resist the centrifugal forces (or rather, to provide centripetal forces). The use of carbon nanotubes as a flywheel material is being researched[citation needed]. The ranges of power and energy storage technically and economically achievable, however, tend to make flywheels unsuitable for general power system application; they are probably best suited to load-leveling applications on railway power systems and for improving power quality in renewable energy systems. One application that currently uses flywheel storage is applications that require very high bursts of power for very short durations such as tokamak and laser experiments where a motor generator is spun up to operating speed and may actually come to a stop in one revolution. Flywheel storage is also currently used to provide Uninterruptible Power Supply systems (such as those in large datacenters) the ride-through power necessary during transfer. (That is, the relatively brief amount of time between a loss of power to the mains and the warm-up of an alternate source, such as a diesel generator.)
Superconducting magnetic energy
Main article: Superconducting magnetic energy storage
Superconducting magnetic energy storage (SMES) systems store energy in the magnetic field created by the flow of direct current in a superconducting coil which has been cryogenically cooled to a temperature below its superconducting critical temperature. A typical SMES system includes three parts: superconducting coil, power conditioning system and cryogenically cooled refrigerator. Once the superconducting coil is charged, the current will not decay and the magnetic energy can be stored indefinitely. The stored energy can be released back to the network by discharging the coil. The power conditioning system uses an inverter/rectifier to transform alternating current (AC) power to direct current or convert DC back to AC power. The inverter/rectifier accounts for about 2-3% energy loss in each direction. SMES loses the least amount of electricity in the energy storage process compared to other methods of storing energy. SMES systems are highly efficient; the round-trip efficiency is greater than 95%. The high cost of superconductors is the primary limitation for commercial use of this energy storage method.
Due to the energy requirements of refrigeration, and the limits in the total energy able to be stored, SMES is currently used for short duration energy storage. Therefore, SMES is most commonly devoted to improving power quality. If SMES were to be used for utilities it would be a diurnal storage device, charged from base load power at night and meeting peak loads during the day.
Hydrogen
Main article: Hydrogen economy
Hydrogen is not a primary energy source, but a portable energy storage method, because it must first be manufactured by other energy sources in order to be used. However, as a storage medium, it may be a significant factor in using renewable energies. See hydrogen storage. [6] Hydrogen may be used in conventional internal combustion engines, or in fuel cells which convert chemical energy directly to electricity without flames, similar to the way the human body burns fuel. Making hydrogen requires either reforming natural gas with steam, or, for a possibly renewable and more ecologic source, the electrolysis of water into hydrogen and oxygen. The former process has carbon dioxide as a by-product. With electrolysis, the greenhouse burden depends on the source of the power.
With intermittent renewables such as solar and wind, the output may be fed directly into an electricity grid. At penetrations below 20% of the grid demand, this does not severely change the economics; but beyond about 20% of the total demand, external storage will become important. If these sources are used for electricity to make hydrogen, then they can be utilized fully whenever they are available, opportunistically. Broadly speaking, it does not matter when they cut in or out, the hydrogen is simply stored and used as required. A community based pilot program using wind turbines and hydrogen generators is being developed undertaken from 2007 for five years in the remote community of Ramea, Newfoundland and Labrador.[8]
Nuclear advocates note that using nuclear power to manufacture hydrogen would help solve plant inefficiencies. Here the plant would be run continuously at full capacity, with perhaps all the output being supplied to the grid in peak periods, and any not needed to meet demand being used to make hydrogen at other times. This would mean far better efficiency for the nuclear power plants. High temperature (950-1,000°C) gas cooled nuclear reactors have the potential to separate hydrogen from water by thermochemical means using nuclear heat (i.e. without using electrolysis).
About 50 kWh (180 MJ) is required to produce a kilogram of hydrogen by electrolysis, so the cost of the electricity clearly is crucial. At $0.03/kWh, common off-peak high-voltage line rate in the U.S., this means hydrogen costs $1.50 a kilogram for the electricity, equivalent to $1.50 a US gallon for gasoline if used in a fuel cell vehicle. Other costs would include the electrolyzer plant, compressors, liquefaction, storage and transportation, which will be significant. The round trip efficiency for hydrogen storage is typically 50 to 60% for generation and 50 to 60% for storage or 25 to 36%, much lower than pumped storage or batteries.
Economics
Generally speaking, energy storage is economical when the marginal cost of electricity varies more than the costs of storing and retrieving the energy plus the price of energy lost in the process. For instance, assume a pumped-storage reservoir can pump to its upper reservoir water equivalent to 1,200 MWh during the night, for $15 per MWh, at a total cost of $18,000. The next day, all of the stored energy can be sold at the peak hours for $40 per MWh, but from the 1,200 MWh pumped 50 were lost due to evaporation and seeping in the reservoir. 1,150 MWh are sold for $46,000, for a final profit of $28,000.
However, the marginal cost of electricity varies because of the varying operational and fuel costs of different classes of generators. At one extreme, base load power plants such as coal-fired power plants and nuclear power plants are low marginal cost generators, as they have high capital and maintenance costs but low fuel costs. At the other extreme, peaking power plants such as gas turbine natural gas plants burn expensive fuel but are cheaper to build, operate and maintain. To minimize the total operational cost of generating power, base load generators are dispatched most of the time, while peak power generators are dispatched only when necessary, generally when energy demand peaks. This is called "economic dispatch".
Demand for electricity from the world's various grids varies over the course of the day and from season to season. For the most part, variation in electric demand is met by varying the amount of electrical energy supplied from primary sources. Increasingly, however, operators are storing lower-cost energy produced at night, then releasing it to the grid during the peak periods of the day when it is more valuable.[9] In areas where hydroelectric dams exist, release can be delayed until demand is greater; this form of storage is common and can make use of existing reservoirs. This is not storing "surplus" energy produced elsewhere, but the net effect is the same - although without the efficiency losses. Renewable supplies with variable production, like wind and solar power, tend to increase the net variation in electric load, increasing the opportunity for grid energy storage.
Load Levelling
The demand for electricity from consumers and industry is constantly changing, broadly within the following categories:
- Seasonal (during dark winters more electric lighting and heating is required, while in other climates hot weather boosts the requirement for air conditioning)
- Weekly (most industry closes at the weekend, lowering demand)
- Daily (such as the peak as everyone arrives home and switches the television on)
- Hourly (one method for estimating television viewing figures in the United Kingdom is to measure the power spike when advertisements are shown and everyone goes to switch the kettle on)
- Transient (fluctuations due to individual's actions, differences in power transmission efficiency and other small factors that need to be accounted for)
There are currently three main methods for dealing with changing demand:
- Electrical devices generally having a working voltage range that they require, commonly 110-120V or 220-240V. Minor variations in load are automatically smoothed by slight variations in the voltage available across the system.
- Power plants can be run below their normal output, with the facility to increase the amount they generate almost instantaneously. This is termed 'Spinning Reserve'.
- Additional power plants can be brought online to provide a larger generating capacity. Typically, these would be combustion gas turbines, which can be started in a matter of minutes.
The problem with relying on these last two methods in particular is that they are expensive, because they leave expensive generating equipment unused much of the time, and because plants running below maximum output usually produce at less than their best efficiency. Grid energy storage is used to shift load from peak to off-peak hours. Power plants are able to run closer to their peak efficiency for much of the year.
Energy demand management
Main article: Energy demand management
The easiest way to deal with varying electrical loads is to decrease the difference between varying generation and demand. This is referred to as demand side management (DSM). For decades, utilities have sold off-peak power to large consumers at lower rates, to encourage these users to shift their loads to off-peak hours, in the same way that telephone companies do with individual customers. Usually, these time-dependent prices are negotiated ahead of time. In an attempt to save more money, some utilities are experimenting with selling electricity at minute-by-minute spot prices, which allow those users with monitoring equipment to detect demand peaks as they happen, and shift demand to save both the user and the utility money. Demand side management can be manual or automatic and is not limited to large industrial customers. In residential and small business applications, for example, appliance control modules can reduce energy usage of water heaters, air conditioning units, and other devices during these periods by turning them off for some portion of the peak demand time or by reducing the power that they draw. Energy demand management includes more than reducing overall energy use or shifting loads to off-peak hours. A particularly effective method of energy demand management is the installation of more energy efficient equipment. For example, many utilities give rebates for the purchase of insulation, weatherstripping, and appliances and light bulbs that are energy efficient. Companies with factories and large buildings can also install such products, but they can also buy energy efficient industrial equipment, like boilers, or use more efficient processes to produce products. Companies may get incentives like rebates or low interest loans from utilities or the government for the installation of energy efficient industrial equipment.
Portability
This is the area of greatest success for current energy storage technologies. Single-use and rechargeable batteries are ubiquitous, and provide power for devices with demands as varied as digital watches and cars. Advances in battery technology have generally been slow, however, with much of the advance in battery life that consumers see being attributable to efficient power management rather than increased storage capacity. This has become an issue as pressure grows for alternatives to the internal combustion engine in cars and other means of transport. These uses require far more energy density (the amount of energy stored in a given volume or weight) than current battery technology can deliver. Liquid hydrocarbon fuel (such as gasoline,ethanol/petrol and diesel) have much higher energy densities.
Reliability
Virtually all devices that operate on electricity are adversely affected by the sudden removal of their power supply. Solutions such as UPS (uninterruptible power supplies) or backup generators are available, but these are expensive. Efficient methods of power storage would allow for devices to have a built-in backup for power cuts, and also reduce the impact of a failure in a generating station. Examples of this are currently available using fuel cells and flywheels.
See also
References
- ^ [1]
- ^ [2]
- ^ [3]
- ^ [4]
- ^ http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn7081 , http://www.toshiba.co.jp/about/press/2005_03/pr2901.htm
- ^ Woody, Todd. "PG&E's Battery Power Plans Could Jump Start Electric Car Market." (Blog). Green Wombat, 2007-06-12. Retrieved on 2007-08-19
- ^ http://www.planetark.com/dailynewsstory.cfm/newsid/44343/story.htm
- ^ Introduction of Hydrogen Technologies to Ramea Island
- ^ Energy Information Administration / Annual Energy Review 2006, Table 8.2a
External links
- Electricity storage technologies
- Graphical comparisons of different energy storage systems: